won't come to anything more than continued political grandstanding at congressional meetings and hearings.
Hillary has been selected as the first woman president by a very large constituency that has momentum in many demographic and social categories. it is almost to the point that the only politically correct decision is to make her the president if we are to be socially progressive as a country. the national media will support her in this endeavor.
I can't believe how she can be considered the best candidate in her party and certainly not when you add the opposition to the list. she is just a tired old professional politician to me, looking to cash in on her fame and celebrity status. she has had some good ideas (if you are a liberal progressive), but has accomplished little if nothing on her own. she has no leadership presence and no standout character. she is overly sensitive to comments she perceives as making her marginal or deferential to Bill. that type of behavior may appeal to women but is not presidential .
A long time ago I owned stock in a Texas bank when banks were having problems and the investor relations people were adamant that the bank was never in danger of going out of business/having to file bankruptcy.
When the news came out that it could no longer operate the investor relations guy just whined about nobody willing to offer funding to keep them in business. When the sub-prime loan houses were dropping like flies in 2007-08 you would see dividend announcements and positive ceo comments one day and going out of business announcements the next day.
"""""" . As blonde points out, we have all the empirical evidence we need to conclude the programs he mentioned as well as many more that are supported by Dems work well for the individuals they help and for the country by extension """""""
please elaborate. please cite your sources. please prove your point with objective numbers and facts. you have it, let's see it.
I wonder if they offer classes in Ebonics at these universities. Just what we need to bring us all together. Oakland, CA school districts tried to get Fed funds to teach Ebonics to its (black) school children. Real smart.
Then they complain about whitey.
""" Yet as Americans we simply cannot toss aside the cherished military ethos of leaving no one behind.""" -----"" fail to understand the code of military justice and its operation""""
Ethos and code notwithstanding, there is an obvious degree of cognitive dissonance on the part of the soldiers involved in this episode. Apparently desertion is not considered that important of a crime, at least not when a soldier simply walks away from a base to get away from the military. Dishonorable discharge or similar proceedings are among the penalties for that behavior. The military does not go on a manhunt for you.
An NBC article stated that the army knew where Berg was and how he was being held but took no action to retrieve him as they weighed the costs and lives to accomplish a mission to fetch a known (by his peers and superiors) deserter who sought out the enemy for assistance. The question becomes did the army leave Berg behind or did Berg leave the army behind. It appears that the fact that Berg was in enemy hands is what activates the ethos of no one left behind and it is up to the military justice system to adjudicate the issue of behavior.
the price was more than 5 when the split took place, that is 10+ after the split. it is now 9.78
explain how a lousy .07 distribution makes that loss of capital (stock price) acceptable.
although you signed on to the yahoo board march 2, 2015 you seem to have a genuine interest in pharma stocks. so go ahead and put me on ignore and have a nice day. that's the best way for newcomers to get what they want.
and you do. I know what I see and hear, and I saw and heard Obama tell us that it is military tradition, modus operandi not to leave anyone behind, thus his decision to negotiate the return of Berg'l.
now, since you are the implied knowledgeable source here, can you explain, including the relevant codes, that would require Susan Rice to declare B'l serving with honor and distinction along with Obama having his parents attend a publicity event to announce his release?
and who is responsible for this other than our own government, dem and rep, over all these decades of supporting single mothers ad infinite while they keep the stud in the closet.
they know that sooner or later the income producers, middle class and wealthy, will have to fork over more and more to keep it fair.
so he can take more and more afrezza but cannot take more and more shots to do virtually the same thing (over eat ) ?? so he controls his eating because he does not like to take more shots.? what about one BIG shot (between the eyes).
the reverse split was to give it room to go down and stay above $5 share. watch your money fly away with gabelli gabux.
nobody wants to use afrezza, nobody wants to insure it tier one, analysts downgrade it, Cramer says the breathalyzer does not work. just wait about 10 years?????