Thu, Aug 21, 2014, 1:19 PM EDT - U.S. Markets close in 2 hrs 41 mins


% | $
Quotes you view appear here for quick access.

Lions Gate Entertainment Corp. Message Board

nicholsoncdn 7 posts  |  Last Activity: Jun 13, 2014 12:24 PM Member since: Jul 5, 2013
SortNewest  |  Oldest  |  Highest Rated Expand all messages
  • Reply to

    Disruptive technology - That's INO

    by nicholsoncdn Jun 13, 2014 11:02 AM nicholsoncdn Jun 13, 2014 12:24 PM Flag

    When the positive cult following really hits this stock, it will run like Telsa, Netflix, Priceline, Apple, and etc. The cost for a ticket only goes up from here.

  • Reply to

    Disruptive technology - That's INO

    by nicholsoncdn Jun 13, 2014 11:02 AM nicholsoncdn Jun 13, 2014 11:23 AM Flag

    Companies like this (INO) will be fought by just about everyone because their is so much to lose here (Money). It would be like telling big oil that solar is going to replace it. This would create some instability in Big Pharma. Health care would change as we know it!

  • by nicholsoncdn Jun 13, 2014 11:02 AM Flag

    Disruptive technology is a term coined by Harvard Business School professor Clayton M. Christensen to describe a new technology that unexpectedly displaces an established technology.

    In his 1997 best-selling book, "The Innovator's Dilemma," Christensen separates new technology into two categories: sustaining and disruptive. Sustaining technology relies on incremental improvements to an already established technology. Disruptive technology lacks refinement, often has performance problems because it is new, appeals to a limited audience, and may not yet have a proven practical application. (Such was the case with Alexander Graham Bell's "electrical speech machine," which we now call the telephone.)

    In his book, Christensen points out that large corporations are designed to work with sustaining technologies. They excel at knowing their market, staying close to their customers, and having a mechanism in place to develop existing technology. Conversely, they have trouble capitalizing on the potential efficiencies, cost-savings, or new marketing opportunities created by low-margin disruptive technologies. Using real-world examples to illustrate his point, Christensen demonstrates how it is not unusual for a big corporation to dismiss the value of a disruptive technology because it does not reinforce current company goals, only to be blindsided as the technology matures, gains a larger audience and marketshare and threatens the status quo.

    Sentiment: Strong Buy

  • Reply to

    What is AF implying?

    by nicholsoncdn Jun 10, 2014 5:22 PM nicholsoncdn Jun 10, 2014 5:49 PM Flag

    Agreed! AF is clearly stating INO's management is misleading shareholders. This is why some weak hands sold today. 3 wasted trading days... Long and holding on -

    Sentiment: Strong Buy

  • by nicholsoncdn Jun 10, 2014 5:22 PM Flag

    If a reverse split was done because they knew of bad data from a double blinded study. Could this or would this be illegal? I would think the FDA and SEC would have a problem with this.
    This smells like a law suit to me. If I was INO, I would sue!

    Sentiment: Strong Buy

  • This will be unexpected revenue that not no one is talking about.

    Sentiment: Strong Buy

  • Reply to

    How can anyone trust Obamacare?

    by foxnewsbschecker3 May 21, 2014 5:01 PM nicholsoncdn May 22, 2014 10:39 AM Flag

    We as taxpayers will pay for it this way or through rising cost of these people not being covered going in and out of emergency rooms. Preventive Care lowers cost if done correctly. Is it lazy people we worry about, minorities, folks with pre-existing conditions, senior citizens, or someone getting something you want. Do we get this mad when big companies or well off people get tax breaks or use their lawyers to navigate tax laws to find loopholes. What are we really mad at? When people complain, or find things to complain about, and allow it to consume them, then their is a larger problem that needs to be addressed. America must change the way we view things. It's us and not them. Integrate or Integration is a good word for Obamacare (1950-1960 all over again). United we stand or divided we fall.
    Any way, we control the cost of health care cost now to insure our kids, and our country can compete and have jobs for a strong economy in the future. If Obamacare is broken, fix the part that needs to be fixed and move on. However, all you hear from politicians is complaining. Our economy is how we will stay strong as a nation, have you heard what's going on in China and Russia. These countries know that beating us is finding our weaknesses and using it against us. We are divided in our own country and then we fuel our enemies by our ability not to control our cost and consumption. We all waste, then complain, we are all fueled by greed that leads to hate, obesity, bad habits and other things, but we want more. This is a path to destruction. We talk about America the great, but we are divided. Any American that has sense, know the Healthcare law was voted through the House and the Senate. This law was also written by them as well. It takes 3 branches of Government to enact a law. Politics can turn a rich man into a poor man and a poor man into a rich man. I did not vote for Obama either.... Just a concerned American

32.67+0.04(+0.12%)1:16 PMEDT

Trending Tickers

Trending Tickers features significant U.S. stocks showing the most dramatic increase in user interest in Yahoo Finance in the previous hour over historic norms. The list is limited to those equities which trade at least 100,000 shares on an average day and have a market cap of more than $300 million.