Not that long ago liars were considered to be the worst kind of personal failure. We make our investment deceisions based on DD, various facts including financial along with what we derive from PR . In the end we balance evrything to decide any action. There are a lot of smart people here(not that I am qualified to judge) who decided to support AMBS as an investment. The world class BOD, the integrity of the WW medical research community, anaecdotes such BD assay results, papers on MANF, patents do not get granted irresponsibily....and anaecdotes... "we will never uplist from weakness". I hope the country gets back to isolateing and scorning liars, we must watch and profile liars, track them like child abusers. The country is full of liars now, some are running the government but most of us keep our lives private and avoid associating with known liars. We need to get back to that, liars hurt everyone, GC needs to be marked.
I do not like doing business with liars. If he has to be a liar to compete then we are all screwed. We buy based on what we are told, DD and research. We own that decision, no problem. Being told lies which directly influence decisions cannot be tolerated. He has miracles to perform and lots of splaining to do, and even then he has lost credibility forever. All the claims about world class BOD(team) BD assays, way back from the start are just BS.
Yes but..."Loyal " to WHAT?. Just what are we supposed to believe? What evidence do we have of any kind of an ongoing concern here? I have spent a lot of money here and time supporting an organization that has done nothing but screw me over the past years. There has to be a suitable clinical term to decribe this kind of behavior, aside from stupid fool. Maybe this is all part of his master plan with WW famous BOD support? Really? Unless he starts now to claim and proves with clinical evidence he has a cure for AD, PD, blindness and PTSD he is dogmeat in my book.
If the upcoming 6 + meeting PR blitz brings some miracle news...then what?
IMO, if that is true(ESS) this info will be hard to keep quiet...very high leverage
"Data has been published in peer-reviewed publications on LymPro with 160 patients, demonstrating 92% co-positivity and 91% co-negativity with an overall 95% accuracy rating for LymPro.
I also think the fact we are forced to use pre scaffold metircs and methods ot describe breakthrough medicine. Judging the success or not by using these PR methods will be tough. Low information flow (IMO) is attributed to our inability to connect the clinical dots except by speculation, which Perrin will not do. I do not blame him. It's a slippery slope but, there it is.
OR, they have something to say ....if I were you I would bet everything you can get your hands on against the house...bye, bye. axxholes
Seems the breakthrough technology has pushed the ongoing value of the existing systems. SCI, although understood, lacks sufficient detail going forward.
Wondered as well on this point. Now I think it becomes obvious that the focus has been on getting patents and MFG license agreements lined up. NOW, we have real items, products, services to sell...not just vapor. Totally different ballgame. We should see different kind of interest going forward...out of concept phase into demonstration...now issues will be on cash and deliverables to program milestones. This is the true GROWTH phase, IMO.