lil comrade: Just for fun I followed your "advice" about the "punch out hole" (which I think is literally in your head), This is one person's THEORY about the type of plane that crashed into the Pentagon. Even if its not the accepted version, nothing is changed. How come I am supposed to be awed by these unsupported left wing kook pieces and when I present you with credible and decades old research that has been around since WW2 in some cases you go ape and into denial? On the other hand, you are a liberal so what else should I expect? Remember: you can't let facts get in the way when your mind is already made up
lil comrade old pal: There are many things you don't find and don't see. Obama was interviewed on Fox(that's right the network you hate he agreed to be on) with Bill O'Reilly. O'Reilly asked him that very question about corruption and Obama said there was none at all.. the lying king has struck again.
lil comrade: It appears you have stepped in it again.............(pardon the dots as I just got over a laughing fit) Anyway, ,Do you know who he is?
Maybe it never occurred to you, and no doubt it hasn't, that if CA workers were not under liberal rule they would be paying a lot less in taxes and the state would not be close to belly up with all kinds of costly and goofy gov. regulations on top of it. You should really study the incredible turn around that courageous conservative Gov. Scott Walker has utilized in his state of WS(actually everyone should know this but of course the media won't dare report it) With tax cuts the citizens have more $,,gov,. gets more $ and real jobs get created and this forced gov. sick leave would likely not even be an issue . You say its so great because two states have it? That means 48 states don't and you can be sure WS will remain one of them as long as they have Gov. Walker(by the way the state had such a large surplus the Gov,. pledged rebates). ps Its no wonder CA is in the shape they are in with a liberal fossil like Jerry Brown. Happens everytime liberals get in power.
CA voters can be free . All they need do is vote out all of those (liberals) who have taken it from them and keep them out.
Now you want to quote still another liberal talking piece as if it was fact? Sounds like the last gasp of desperation..
I finally have stopped laughing when I read this one. Now you want to go back to Reagan again because your theory on GW Bush has been ripped to shreds? You really should keep going as I told you before, all the way back to Lincoln(republican) who suspended habeas corpus (don't ask me to "paste" it and you can look up what it means. I'll wait and in the meantime I gotta tell you that you are one strange but really funny duck)
Nope- you lose again alien again. The other problem is having a political difference and going outside the Constitution are two different things. One is acceptable and the other is not. Do you know which is which?
Nope its just blather as usual. No president or branch of our government is totally immune from outside scrutiny EVER. This is called the system of checks and balances which you should have learned in school-like so much else. The founders in their wisdom also recognized and feared any one of the 3 main branches of gov. getting too much power-esp. one person such as the president or other high ranking official. The number of "executive orders" is not nearly as significant as the nature of the orders. In other words, are they Constitutional? There is widespread belief among historians, scholars and others who are far more knowledgable than you, that Obama's are unconstitutional and that is why he is under the scrutiny that he is . It is only because of who Obama is and how he has been able to skillfully create the mirage all these things are happening without his knowledge is how he has got away with it up to this point. However, the game is not over yet.
ok mr smart guy: I will ask you the question for about the umpteenth time: How did Obama specifically make the market rise?
rdietsche14: This is one of the problems with him and libs in general. They are used to dictating terms and think because they say something it is true and everyone agrees with them. The other part is his entire premise is flawed and if you go back and look at some of his other rambling goofy posts you will also find he jumps from one point to the next and brings in a great deal of just plain stupid things That said, I have already acknowledged the situation is not a positive one, but this idiot thinks its ok for him and other libs to mock selected Christians (read his post again as it is all there) .Hope this helps
No. If he was not restrained by our founding documents he would be a dictator in same league as the worst of them. As it is, he has gone so far over the line and that is why there is investigation after investigation,talk of lawsuits and more. No contradiction at all. He is both
No stupid I am not betting against the country as I understand what is holding the markets up. As for the rest, it was in Obama's campaign and he said it that this would be a time that would be remembered as peaceful and he openly bad mouthed GW Bush for years for doing the same thing he did as pres. The lying king also said his adm would be the most transparent in history. How is that working out?
Right . There was nothing "illegal or compromising". In case you don't know, and you probably don't, it is common practice for company officers and others to hold large sums of stock and compensation in their companies If Cheney made money so what? If they got contracting so what-its common and legal As for off shore you have no idea what you are talking about-but that is nothing new either. To sum it up" nothing illegal or immoral was found and case is again dismissed due to lack of evidence. On the other hand there was evidence against impeached and disgraced Pres. Bill Clinton who will be forever remembered in history for his sex scandals and much more and Obama has a real good chance as being rated the worst pres. we have ever had.(good for Carter however)
Here is one more for you timely: Go back and slowly read the sentence you posted"Obama ordered airstrikes and is waiting for congress' approval."...... Now substitute just one one word: take out the word Obama and put in the word Bush and everything changes. Obama is the same president who PROMISED all of this was going to end and it is getting worse. ps Don't worry too much about getting into another recession because the dirty little secret is there are many, including myself, who believe we are still in one.
So you want a retrial? ok Iraq was not wrongdoing as it was preemptive based on the same intel GW Bush AND dems had at the time. GW Bush did exactly what his oath of office says he should do "preserve, protect and defend " this country. His actions were also backed at the time and that only changed when dems saw (as they always do) political opportunity and of course the lap dog media jumped all over it. The "transfer of wealth to Haliburton" is too stupid to even rebuke. As for the gay kid, I said likely few if any will defend and even if there are some that do, they are entitled to their opinion just like you and the other liberal nuts are, No one knew where or when the terrorists would strike-just like Pearl Harbor at the time and I have credited FDR for good wartime leadership-his other failings aside. as I have GW Bush. Case dismissed again. Your only other other option is to appeal to the Supreme Court of write a letter to Dear Abbey or pound some sand.