So now you once again want me to comment on GW Bush and his military spending? (no matter he is out of office for 5+ years)? Just how many centuries do you nitwits on the left plan to blame Bush and try to take attention off Obama? It won't work here, but since you ask again:I favor reasonable military spending and also think Bush at times did spend too much. Compared to Obama, however, its a drop in the bucket and he is the pres. NOW. You and the rest of kook left really should get professionally checked with your Bush obsession.
comrade: It appears I gave you too much credit as I am not used to dealing with this amount of ignorance and arrogance at the same time. You can say I am wrong until the cows come home and the fact still won'
t change. Remember a pear is still a pear even if you call it an apple.
comrade: Classic case of the pot calling the kettle black. Maybe next time it will only take you 14 times to answer a simple question.
comrade: I don't need any "gotcha questions" Your posts make it so easy its like taking candy from a baby. Or as Rush often puts it that he needs to keep one hand tied behind his back just to make it fair.
I could have sworn you don't know what you are talking about and that is the case. Always great entertainment as I have always said.
comrade: Its called asking a question you would not even attempt to answer until I asked you 15 times . Then you excrete some ;more hot air about NASA and highways which are paid for by the taxpayers and these gov. projects do not last because they can't and they are only funded so far. It is simply recycled money. That is why only the private sector creates real regular jobs and real wealth.
comrade: Its not about NASA, science spending ;or Russia flying our astronauts etc.. Its about REDUCED spending. Dems continue to lie(what a shock) about spending like everything else. Republicans are simply trying to reduce the GROWTH in spending and thus reduce this unsustainable debt Obama has created. Like everything else this has been explained to you before
I am quaking in my boot thinking about NASA. Actually its far more frightening to have citizens this dumbed down, but you are always good entertainment.
If you insist. Here we go again. Lowering taxes for all(like Regan did) puts more $$ in people's pockets and generally makes them feel better and more optimistic. They then spend more, create more jobs and thus the gov. also gets more $$. Its a win win you might say and also an chance to LOWER spending and thus reduce the debt-also good economics and good for future generations. Socialist Obama,Carter and other libs have done just the opposite with opposite results and it works that way every time. In other words, it is false to say Reagan created poverty just as it is false to say Obama created wealth and is responsible for the rising market.
comrade: The question was not whether I oppose construction, it was how many regular jobs does gov. create? . Now that we have that settled, how many problems do libs solve(not going to ask 15-16 times again)? If and when you answer this one I will tell you which ones they CREATE and why.
Almost forgot to mention. It is well known that Obama claims there are 57 states and thinks our military are "corpsemen". You won't hear it reported but he also could not spell the word respect as his teleprompter left out an e. All this from the smartest guy(possible exception of Joe Biden) in the world.
That is the whole point: he is taking our freedom and liberty away as fast as possible and as much as possible. You are likely right that we are stuck with him and its not impossible he will try to change the Constitution that he hates anyway to get a third term and beyond. He has gotten away with so much so far because anytime anyone calls him out, they are branded as a racist and obstructionist by people like you. The rest of what you wrote is just psycho babble.
comrade: No. I prefer a world where we get to keep our freedom and liberty and not be punished by some lying socialist leader for working hard, ,sacrificing and staying determined ;to succeed. I prefer the values and beliefs that made this country so great as to be called a "shining city on a hill". I also prefer to help those who really need it and cut off those who don't. In short, I prefer a world that gets your party out of power and keeps them out for the good of this great nation and for the sake of those who built it and those who maintain it.
comrade: If you really believe this rot gut as you claim,then all it does is show how bad our educational system that is run by your party really is.
Its all gov money . and it all comes from the same source-guess who pays for it? This is why FDR prolonged the depression and is also why Obama's "stimulus" will not and cannot work.