So the 97% of scientists who do support it are not competent to form an opinion?
The underlining science is CO2 is a green house, there is more CO2 today than 150 years ago and that increase is due to man's activities. All you need to do is come up with one just one report that disproves any of the three claims and you will disprove Man Made Global Warming.
The theory of MMGW does not date back to 2006 with Al Gores's ”Inconvenient Truth” but back to 1896 and none of your competent Scientists have yet to disprove it.
There is an overlap with agenda and the truth, when a ship is sinking the agenda is to get everybody off the ship. The Truth is Man Made Global Warming is real, the agenda is to fix it.
What part don't you think is real? CO2 is a Green house gas? There is more CO2 today than 150 years ago? The Extra CO2 is man made?
According to the NRA YES. It would fall under the Second, Forth, Fifth,Sixth, and Eighth Amendment.
He is implying that you don't accept the word of 97% of the worlds scientists only because of your disdain of Al Gore.
Just about anybody working for the Koch Brothers. Not that they would be influenced by who is paying them that would be wrong.
So Shias are going to sell a nuke to Sunnis? That just does not sound right. Now if you said North Korea it would be more believable.
Slow down, gather your thoughts, and next time try typing in English?
It was their money before we took, it has been their money as we held it, and it will be their money when we give it back. How would feel if the Fed took you aluminum foil hat collection?
At one time the Washington Post was a liberal paper. Today it is the almost the publishing arm of the GOP.
We are not giving them a dime it is their money, how ignorant do you have to be not to know that?
How were they illegally deleted? It was up to Clinton on what e-mails were private and what was worked related and to delete the private e-mails. She followed the law.
If Snowden passed on any of Clinton's e-mail he did not get them from Her server so how would it be Her fault.
The cut backs that were part of the Sequester deal that passed the House with a majority of Republican votes and passed unanimous in the Senate? Those cut backs.
You just have a very misleading headline. So along with the CIA telling her that it was not a planned attack questionable sources were saying it was a planned attack using an unplanned protest. So in other words the terrorists in question are clairvoyant.
A large number of ranchers and farmers did not want to give up just a small piece of land for the XL pipe line you think they will give up the land to build a new Edwards let alone a new Nellis Complex. And if they do how much will it cost? The only one left is Alaska and the environmentalist will come out enforce only to be joined by Big Oil who would lose use of a large swath of public land.
Bottom line Nellis AFB complex is big and has 5,000 sq mi of restricted airspace, the question to you is where to put it and how much will it cost seeing how Nevada along with California is out of water.
Where can the Air Force develop and test the next generation of aircraft out of the eyes of the public as they can at Groom Lake or Area 51 for you conspiracy theorist.
So you are saying the Benghazi terrorists e-mailed the State Department before the attack?
The US would have to relocate 11 air craft battle groups, Russia and China one each. So not everybody is in the same boat so to speak
When one repeats a lie often enough people will tend to believe it. Such as Pres Obama is not a natural born American while maintaining that Rafael Cruz is.
Try to name a Republican who called for the removal of Norman McAllister or David Vitter?