"stock shows the lack of participation by institutions". Hey Opal...I'm an institution:). Have a great weekend and thanks for the positive thoughts, NOT!
No...you get there by taking risk and he has the where with all to do just that!. Nuance may or may not pan out for him. If not, he moves on...we don't!
OMG High Risk... 3.5% doesn't even take CI out of REM sleep. He's in a different game than us...you have to admit it, unfortunately. I didn't get in this game to lay up!
Clearly he would give a damn but it certainly wouldn't be the end of the world to him. Not all of his stocks are successes. We just happen to own one that he (or Brett) miscalculated on. Case in point...VLTC
He's an "activist" when he has to be. Clearly, he must be satisfied with NUANCE'S direction or he would not have stood for extending the PP another year. The resignation of Patrick Hackett may signal activity brewing.
But what the heck do I know? Obviously nothing
losing 3 billion$ in market cap! Wonderful job RR
Wished we knew but initially this won't be perceived as good IMO. Imagine being just a Director and own over 400,000 shares. I hope you are right in thinking CI may have a hand in this.
Is one of the largest shareholders of all the directors to the tune of over 400,000 shares. Hard to imagine anything good about this resignation. Directors get free stock. What's not to like about the seat?
If I'm not mistaken, this is Brett's baby and Carl is along for the ride? Maybe that's why he never discusses it. Let's just hope Brett has the same touch as his father...or not!