What you don't understand is the kids nd parents say it works. That is all you need to know
BY THE PEOPLE FOR THE PEOPLE Hear that anywhere before?
You noticed I said a Doctor decides. There were at least 36 who were in favor. There is no connection in any way between this drug and thalidomide
You should be in the bathroom with your customary magazine
Based on all the testimony the decision to use Sarepta should be a patient /doctor one. Denying access to this drug is a violation of human rights The FDA should be giving Sarepta credit for pioneering this drug not penalizing them. What gods reside at the FDA that can tell a mother what she can or can not do for her dying son, especially when some many experts in the field say the drug works. Time for congress to clean house at the FDA .....These peoples egos are obstructing justice.
I know they shouldn't be swayed by the public, but every kid taking that drug and their parents all said the same thing about its effectiveness.
I agree with you. One panel member had no doubt that the drug works despite a negative vote. This was a meeting on protocol The humanitarian side will surface and prevail
The wording of that last question made if very difficult for the panel to say yes. If the question asked do you think eteplirsen should be approved based on all that was heard, the majority would have said yes And it's not over yet
There is no way the drug doesn't get approval . Too many testimonials. You lost Cheddarburger
God bless me for not being one of your patients I would rather go to Doctor Donald Duck
Do you want to be my chauffeur? Can you clean toilets? I will give you a job all is not lost .