% | $
Quotes you view appear here for quick access.

Hewlett-Packard Company Message Board

page.roler 409 posts  |  Last Activity: 8 hours ago Member since: Aug 13, 2012
  • page.roler page.roler Apr 30, 2015 5:09 PM Flag

    Yea, you're definitely insane, Lies. Or a useful idiot. Or likely both.

    No sane person would believe that Bill Clinton accepting $millions in speaking fees from foreign guvt's, while Hillary was secretary of state - and approving their deals - was not a quid pro quo.

    The good news is that the vast majority of the American public are not insane or guv't useful idiots, and they will destroy Hillary and further destroy the Dem party.

    Keep running with her! We want to see max damage.

  • From the New York Times: Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation as Russians Pressed for Control of Uranium Company

    From Reuters: Exclusive: Clinton charities will refile tax returns, audit for other errors

    From the Washington Post: For Clintons, speech income shows how their wealth is intertwined with charity

    From ABC News: Bill Clinton Cashed In When Hillary Became Secretary of State

  • Former Sen. Lincoln Chafee said he is not convinced Hillary Clinton will be the presidential nominee for the Democratic Party.

    When asked about Clinton being pushed further to the left, Chafee brought up the scandals surrounding the Clinton Foundation and lack of accomplishments.

    “I would argue that between what’s happening internationally in her tenure as Secretary of State, no real accomplishments, and now these new scandal allegations coming out about the Clinton foundation and the book coming out next week.

    These are real,” Chafee said.

    OH MY!

  • And God will continue to punish them until they change their godless, vile ways.

    The Democrat party have become the party of DEATH, DEPENDENCE, and PERVERSION.

    1. Democrats worship abortion MURDER on demand, anytime. They are more than willing to murder INNOCENT 6, 7, 8 pound human baby boys and girls. REAL science and technology have proven them to support murder in the womb, yet the Democrat party denies REAL science and technology, to soothe their consciences.

    2. Democrats worship the FALSE GODS of nature and planet earth. And they use pseudo-science to push the false theory of human-caused global cooling and global warming for the past 50 years. Their policy of defining Carbon Dioxide (CO2) as a pollutant is laughable, and has killed untold millions of POOR people around the globe. And they cause pain and suffering of POOR people, who have to endure fast rising energy prices based on a HOAX.

    3. Democrats are more than willing to EUTHANIZE (MURDER) INNOCENT older human beings - when THEY define when that human being has exhausted their "utility to their false god of the State"

    4. Democrats are the RACIST party. They see everything through the prism of color, which is twisted. Martin Luther King would be so ashamed of the Democrats. They stoke racial divisions,

    5. Democrat Party loves to get people hooked and dependent on Daddy Government. It increases their power and influence. They are more than willing to flood the US with low intelligence, poor, 3rd world ILLEGAL that they can exploit them in their businesses and for their vote slavery.

    6. Democrats support the PERVERTED lifestyle choice of homosexuality. And they want to re-define traditional marriage that has been the bedrock foundation of a civilized society for millennial with the perversion of 'mo "marriage".

    This is not a complete list, but that will do for now. Change your destructive ways, Democrats, or God will continue to punish you.


  • page.roler page.roler Apr 30, 2015 1:12 PM Flag


    OH MY!

  • During the argument, some of Kennedy’s remarks indicated a reluctance to find such a right of 'mo marriage.

    Why, he asked, "should nine unelected justices change the definition of marriage as only between a man and a woman when that concept has existed for millennia?”

    Why, indeed.

  • page.roler page.roler Apr 28, 2015 3:54 PM Flag

    The Clintons did not respond to IBTimes’ questions about the propriety of the speaking arrangements. A spokesperson for the White House referred questions to the State Department and the Clinton Foundation, neither of which responded.

    When she became secretary of state in 2009, Hillary Clinton agreed to subject Bill Clinton’s speaking engagements to a conflict-of-interest review by an ethics counsel in Clinton’s State Department. Documents from Judicial Watch show the counsel’s office approving the bulk of the speaking engagements -- even those that came during or after periods when the firms paying Bill Clinton were filing disclosure forms notifying government regulators that they were lobbying the State Department.

    The revelation that the Clinton family accepted money from 13 firms actively working to influence the Clinton-run State Department follows IBTimes’ report on Monday showing that Goldman Sachs paid Bill Clinton $200,000 just before the banking giant began lobbying the State Department. It also follows earlier IBTimes reports on money flowing into the Clinton Foundation from Pacific Rubiales and Cisco Systems just before Clinton took actions at the State Department that benefited those companies.

  • An investigation conducted by reporters with The International Business Times has revealed that Bill Clinton personally profited from speeches sponsored by 13 corporations or trade associations that were also lobbying Hillary Clinton’s State Department.

    “Many of the companies that paid Bill Clinton for these speeches — a roster of global giants that includes Microsoft, Oracle and Dell — engaged him within the same three-month period in which they were also lobbying the State Department in pursuit of their policy aims, federal disclosure documents show,” the IBT report read. “Several companies received millions of dollars in State Department contracts while Hillary Clinton led the institution.”

    Ten of the 13 firms that both lobbied the State Department and paid Bill Clinton speaking fees did so within the very same three-month reporting period. This group includes five technology firms — Oracle, Dell, Microsoft, SalesForce and VeriSign — that collectively paid Bill Clinton a total of $1.05 million.

    Federal records show that Microsoft and Oracle were lobbying Clinton’s State Department on, among other issues, immigrant work visas. Oracle was also lobbying in pursuit of legislation dealing with penalties for aiding espionage.

    Three of the technology firms that paid Bill Clinton while lobbying Hillary Clinton’s agency also received lucrative State Department contracts. Microsoft received almost $4 million in such contracts after receiving none the year before Clinton joined President Barack Obama’s Cabinet. Oracle received $6.5 million in State Department contracts, a large increase from prior years. Dell secured contracts worth more than $28 million, up from just $2.5 million in the year before Clinton became secretary of state.

    In order to accept the notion that Bill Clinton was unknowingly cashing seven-figure checks from the same firms that were asking his wife for favors, one has to suspend disbelief and abandon common sense to an absurd degree.

  • page.roler page.roler Apr 28, 2015 3:09 PM Flag

    Bad try, no cigar, LiesAllDay. They used their Foundation as a slush fund, giving only 6% to aid. This after the Clintons claimed that 88% went directly to aid - a provable LIE.

    They flew corporate jets, stayed at the finest hotels, and we don't know what they purchased with the millions because 34% of the $$$Millions are in the mysterious "other" category. And they are re-filing 5 years of returns.

    If this were an evil private sector corporation, the top directors/execs would be perp-walked.

  • page.roler page.roler Apr 28, 2015 1:13 PM Flag

    There really are two separate issues here. First, the ridiculously low amount of 6% of the Clinton Foundation booty...oooops, unfortunate choice of words when discussing Bubba & Hilly Clinton....that actually went to direct aid. That is twisted, and no one in their right mind would give to a charity with that percentage.

    The second issue is how they obtained those contributions, who were the donors, and want did they want & receive for their $Millions?

    But according to (most) mindless liberals, everything is just okey-dokie with the Clinton Slush Foundation.

  • Charity Navigator functions as a guide to the reliability of nonprofit organizations, to inform donors. Isabel Vincent of the New York Post reports on the questions being raised by it over the Clinton Foundation.

    Charity Navigator put the foundation on its “watch list,” which warns potential donors about investing in problematic charities.

    The 23 charities on the list include the Rev. Al Sharpton’s troubled National Action Network, which is cited for failing to pay payroll taxes for several years.

    It is not the only watchdog alarmed at the Foundation’s practices:

    “It seems like the Clinton Foundation operates as a slush fund for the Clintons,” said Bill Allison, a senior fellow at the Sunlight Foundation, a government watchdog group run by leading progressive Democrat and Fordham Law professor Zephyr Teachout.

    Another danger sign:

    In July 2013, Eric Braverman, a friend of Chelsea Clinton from when they both worked at McKinsey & Co., took over as CEO of the Clinton Foundation. He took home nearly $275,000 in salary, benefits and a housing allowance from the nonprofit for just five months’ work in 2013, tax filings show. Less than a year later, his salary increased to $395,000, according to a report in Politico.

    Braverman abruptly left the foundation earlier this year, after a falling-out with the old Clinton guard over reforms he wanted to impose at the charity, Politico reported. Last month, Donna Shalala, a former secretary of health and human services under President Clinton, was hired to replace Braverman.

    Mr. Braverman ought to prepare himself for subpoenas.

    OH MY!.......The Clintons are being tried in the Court of Public Opinion....and are being found GUILTY!

  • Reply to

    A very, VERY bad sign for the Clintons

    by page.roler Apr 27, 2015 3:09 PM
    page.roler page.roler Apr 27, 2015 8:27 PM Flag

    How do you know that a Democrat has found him or herself embroiled in a particularly devastating scandal? When the press begins to ask when the Republicans will begin “overplaying” their hands.

    This weekend, you could feel the ground beginning to fall out from beneath Hillary Clinton’s supporters as members of the reporting and commentary classes began to express their doubts about the former secretary of state’s ethics.

  • Reply to

    National Guard activated in Maryland

    by sick_of_blax Apr 27, 2015 8:06 PM
    page.roler page.roler Apr 27, 2015 8:15 PM Flag

    It takes a GOP Governor to clean up liberal mayors messes. Time to put these leftist anarchists down.

  • Reply to

    A very, VERY bad sign for the Clintons

    by page.roler Apr 27, 2015 3:09 PM
    page.roler page.roler Apr 27, 2015 4:43 PM Flag

    Keep whistling past the Hillary graveyard, Lies. We want her twisting in the wind as long as possible. Even major donors are bailing.


  • An insider with connections says that the Clintons’ Russian uranium deal was definitely hinky.

    Michael R. Caputo, writing in the PoliticsNY blog, says that he has in the past run public relations for Renaissance Capital, the Russian investment bank that paid Bill Clinton $500,000 for a speech at the same time the Hillary Clinton State Department was tasked with approving or denying the acquisition of a substantial share of US uranium production.

    Bill Clinton took that half million dollar payment as his wife, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, served as a key member of the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS). This inter-agency panel must approve foreign purchase of private American companies the government deems vital to our national interest.

    Shortly after Bill Clinton delivered the highest paid speech of his life, CFIUS was to consider and approve the key Russian purchase.

    Any insider will tell you that, considering the vital nature of the CFIUS-UraniumOne proceedings, it is nearly 100% certain that Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was directly involved. And Bill took $500,000 indirectly from the Kremlin at the same time.

    Subpoena time is coming for a whole host of people at the State Department.

    OH MY!

  • The most serious threat yet to Hillary Clinton’s planned cakewalk to the presidency is finally being spoken about in public. Donors, observing that donations to Team Clinton are now under scrutiny as possible bribes, are thinking twice about investing in a candidacy that used to be seen as inevitable.

    Usually, such doubts are left unspoken in public. But now, a top fundraiser is obliquely expressing his fears and his plans to suspend fundraising.

    A top Democratic moneyman recruited by Hillary Rodham Clinton’s presidential campaign has put fundraising activities on hold, saying he can’t do it with a clear conscience because the former secretary of state has too many unanswered questions swirling around her.

    New York businessman Jon Cooper, who Team Clinton enlisted for its elite corps of early fundraisers known as “HillStarters,” said that he decided not to tap his donor network for Mrs. Clinton because she hasn’t provided enough answers about foreign donations to the Clinton Foundation while she ran the State Department, her exclusive use of private email for official business as America’s top diplomat and her commitment to liberal priorities.


    But hey, on the plus side, Liesallday is still licking Hillary's bootedKankkkelz.... LOL!

  • The Arkansas Attorney General has the authority to look into any wrongdoing since the foundation is incorporated in the state of Arkansas.

    Arkansas law requires that charities register with the state and also disclose their financial data, principally by attaching the IRS tax form 990. In addition, charities must comply with Arkansas law.

    The Clinton noose tightens.......

  • page.roler by page.roler Apr 27, 2015 2:35 PM Flag

    Democrats carefully preserve political myths. This is how they raise up to greatness awful presidents like Woodrow Wilson, FDR, Truman, JFK, and Clinton. (Even Democrats do not try to pretend that LBJ and Carter were anything but wretched presidents.) These five Democrat presidents, however, were anything but great.

    FDR, we are told, saved America from the Depression and won the Second World War, but FDR made the Depression much worse while debilitated federalism. He too attacked civil liberty. He waged war incompetently and negotiated a “peace” that left Hitler’s erstwhile ally, Stalin, in control of much of Europe.

    Truman’s indecisiveness led to the Korean War, which he then failed to win.

    JFK, the handsome young king of Camelot, failed at every presidential endeavor he attempted, leaving Castro in power, sending military advisors on a no-win mission in Vietnam, and almost causing a nuclear catastrophe in the Cuban Missile Crisis.

    Bill Clinton presided over a failed presidency. Despite the luxury of the Reagan “Peace Dividend” and overwhelming strength in Congress after the 1992 election, Clinton did, really, nothing on his own. NAFTA was negotiated by two Republican presidents, not by Clinton. Welfare reform was forced on Clinton by a Republican Congress. The single domestic policy goal that Bill and Hillary sought, health care reform, failed.

    Every foreign policy and national security problem under Clinton got worse. The newly freed Russia began as our friend and ended as our enemy. Clinton ignored the threat of radical Islam. He let North Korea make major strides toward becoming a nuclear power. He ignored genocide in the southern half of Sudan.

    As Hillary tries to capitalize on the Clinton Myth, America ought to wonder what the heck she is thinking. Bill Clinton was a failure as president, just as Hillary Clinton was a failure as secretary of state.

  • WASHINGTON, April 27 (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday revived religious objections by Catholic groups in Michigan and Tennessee to the Obamacare requirement for contraception coverage, throwing out a lower court decision favoring President Barack Obama's administration.

    You lose

  • You can add California to the list of states that set up Obamacare exchanges and now are having huge problems with them (alongside places like Oregon, Maryland & Vermont).

    Covered California, the Golden State’s exchange was in theory supposed to become self-sustaining this year, but as anyone who has followed the Obamacare rollout knows, it’s not even close to meeting this goal. Things could get really messy after open enrollment ends on April 30th.

    There’s no more money coming from Washington after the state exhausts the $1.1 billion it received from the federal government to get the Obamacare exchange up and running. And state law prohibits Sacramento from spending any money to keep the exchange afloat.

    That presents an existential crisis for Covered California, which is facing a nearly $80 million budget deficit for its 2015-16 fiscal year.

    Covered California Executive Director Peter Lee acknowledged that there are questions about the “long-term sustainability of the organization.”

    The Obama"care" ponzi scheme is imploding.......

33.80+0.83(+2.52%)May 1 4:01 PMEDT