Anyone with plain language reading skills can decipher that the size and scope of the Huawei infringement is a zillion times greater than the ATT case.
- The scope of the infringent is IMMENSE.
- The patents relate to the MAJORITY OF HUAWEI REVENUE.
Huawei has $45 BILLION annual sales.
Huawei will NOT be another nominal settlement like ATT.
The ATT infringement was VERY NARROW IN SCOPE.
That goes without saying, the issue is how positive?
5 million? 10 million? 20 million?
Bashers you are all correct NLST is a POS.
But when the Judge rules for a new trial this will go back to $1.
Have a great night!
To not order one would be a miscarriage of justice and would bring the legal process into disrepute.
LPTH way better than FORD.
I had VLTC and sold way too early.
For toxic financing scam?