Fri, Aug 1, 2014, 9:36 PM EDT - U.S. Markets closed


% | $
Click the to save as a favorite.

Linn Energy, LLC (LINE) Message Board

paths_ca 3 posts  |  Last Activity: Jul 30, 2014 9:31 PM Member since: Nov 18, 2000
SortNewest  |  Oldest  |  Highest Rated Expand all messages
  • There is some disconnect between the articles and the reality. I went to the local Whole Foods yesterday (Vancouver). Lots of people, on a weekday afternoon, I would even say it was crowded. The customers looked like healthy, reasonably happy people, I did not see a single person that was noticeably overweight. A staff from the store asked to help me, and instead of just showing me where the frozen lasagna was, he explained the various varieties to me, and asked if I had any more questions, exceptional assistance.

    Even though I have owned shares, I had never went shopping there before, because people on this board were so critical. I thought I just needed to look at the chart, duh, that was wrong. I found the prices are not bad, especially if you have a plan to buy certain items, then you can buy a lot for $100, and when you see some other interesting items that even the kids will like, then the cost is a lower level of concern. Many really nice items that you cannot find elsewhere like soya ice cream, 5% fat instead of the regular 22%. Once products are that much healthier, I know I will be far less price sensitive.

    It's a great place if you want to control your salt intake. Processed food sells for say $4 per pound and salt can be bought for about 10 cents a pound, so no wonder most food producers load up on the salt. So at Costco, my view is that about a quarter of their products are unfit for human consumption, based on salt content alone. Here the overall shopping experience was really good. Other places can compete by introducing an organic section, but it's not the same, there is so much else missing with that approach, when an alternative like this is available. My thought is that they should just open more stores, and forget about buying back shares? Anyways, that's my "boots on the ground report"...

  • paths_ca paths_ca Jul 27, 2014 1:42 AM Flag

    Since nothing has been said about it being withdrawn, I suppose it still is in the system, but going nowhere, and eventually could be dismissed if the claimant does not do the work and effort to be more serious. There is good information now to defend against the lawsuit, so it should be a lame duck lawsuit now. They are good and exceptionally reasonable. The lawsuit and the whole sampling issue seems to have been a misguided mistake that should have never happened.

  • Reply to


    by dpreim May 21, 2014 12:09 PM
    paths_ca paths_ca May 22, 2014 10:39 AM Flag

    I am not sure, the introduction of products by HLF was well known and had been announced before more than once. Anyone who knew the basics of this company had to know about that, so there is no way that should have been a surprise to anybody. I think it is just institutional selling which hopefully should be finishing soon.

    The problems in China were more a matter of perception than reality, and now the company needs to manage perceptions better, and be seen as a more conservative company. Perhaps being perceived as profit oriented and maybe too aggressive attracted problems in China, so now there is a need for quieter guidance and uniform perceptions, etc. If some institution cannot accept that, then they have to sell and go somewhere else I suppose. Hopefully others realize the company has not changed, just the nature of the character, image, and preferred perceptions.

30.14+0.03(+0.10%)Aug 1 4:00 PMEDT

Trending Tickers

Trending Tickers features significant U.S. stocks showing the most dramatic increase in user interest in Yahoo Finance in the previous hour over historic norms. The list is limited to those equities which trade at least 100,000 shares on an average day and have a market cap of more than $300 million.