Recent

% | $
Quotes you view appear here for quick access.

Iridium Communications Inc. Message Board

pcstel 513 posts  |  Last Activity: 9 hours ago Member since: Jul 7, 1998
SortNewest  |  Oldest  |  Highest Rated Expand all messages
  • Reply to

    IPTECHPAT says...

    by pcstel 12 hours ago

    This IpTechpat guy thinks I distorted the meaning "end of Q1 2015".

    I think he distorted insinuating he was a lawyer for 3 years!!! lol.

    Really, all the great lawyers sought legal opinions from Yahoo stock message boards! Really they did!

    Now that!!! is HYPOCRISY IN ACTION folks!

  • I"Ve been on a yahoo Gstrf/Gsat message board since 1999. When did YOU show up?

  • "f. I came on the board, for the first time on any type of social media, solely because I thought maybe some regulatory attorney or other professional was on the board and had insights on the FCC rule making process, which I did not. "
    '

    LOL!! What's wrong IPTech.. Cat got your tounge??? Let me guess.. Very busy...Is it Tax Season again?

    PCSTEL

  • " He was predicting 30 cents by now . Its a public message board . "

    You see.. This is what happens when you read Sat-Fi's MYTHOLOGY Threads.. You read his MYTHOLOGY that he posts as FACTS and actually believe they are FACTS!

    PCSTEL

  • iptechpat • Apr 30, 2016 2:15 PM Flag

    Vic, thanks for the support but, really, support from PCS is unnecessary and probably undesirable. He has very good "in the weeds" knowledge of MSS but has also perfected the craft of distortion and displays it here often. I am invested in GSAT at least primarily because of TLPS, not MSS. So, soon after he arrived on the board and I read his postings, I found him primarily irrelevant to my own thesis. Honestly, the Yahoo board is becoming tiresome for me to try to follow, let alone get something useful out of. "I came on the board, for the first time on any type of social media, solely because I thought maybe some regulatory attorney or other professional was on the board and had insights on the FCC rule making process, which I did not. Having found none," I put the time in to find out what I could and pass it along.

    Now, soon, I will delete all my posts on this board and move on. It will be my way of putting this chapter and personal social media experience in the past. I have no desire to be around in 20 years expounding on how much experience I have to all who will listen. I will continue to maintain my investment in GSAT for as long as my own thesis holds up. And, I will continue to post on the FB page which, imo, is a more professional and rational environment of debate on the subject. Good luck to you and to all who have contributed value on this board. It has generally been a very positive and often entertaining experience.
    Iptechpat
    **********
    Really, someone who represents himself as being in the Legal Profession decided to turn to an anonymous Yahoo Stock Message Board in search of a"regulatory attorney" that had insights on the FCC rule making process?

    Is this how legal professionals get their "legal opinions"? From a Yahoo Stock Message Board?? Something doesn't sound right to me.. No lawyer is going to consult an anonymous Yahoo Stock Message Board for a legal opinion..

    And so it goes,
    PCSTEL

  • "There now, that wasn't so hard, was it? Thanks for providing your own examples of distortions, and clearing it up so fast."

    LOL!! You are free to call that a "distortion" if you so chose..

    stating
    Approval by end of Q1 2015
    Approval by end of Q2 2015
    Approval by end of Q3 2015
    Approval by end of Q4 2015

    Clearly indicates that you postulated short term approval predictions throughout 2015, which I haven't seen you deny BTW. . After all "Approval by end of" represents the entire quarter.. Not the last day of the quarter.

    However, in order to abbreviate this thread.. You are free to call "Near term approval in Q1 and throughout 2015" vs. "Approval by the end of Q1" as a "distortion.. LOL!!

    While I would claim that "impersonating a Lawyer" would be a "distortion" LOL!!

    So how is that hunt for Regulatory Lawyers with FCC proceeding experience going for you on this Yahoo thread? Seems it would just be easier to consult your legal network for an opinion.. But, I guess each has their own tactics.... LOL!! Hmmm.. Let's see.. Actual Credentialed Lawyers specializing in Communications Law and FCC regulatory issues, or, some anonymous poster on a Yahoo Stock Message Board who will tell you what you want to hear, that represents themselves as Credentialed Law Professionals. LOL!!

    Take you pick..

    And so it goes,
    PCSTEL

  • Stay focused here iptech

    We have two different threads going on here..

    One about "your predictions" and this one about this curious idea you had of the concept that you would use an anonymous Yahoo Stock Message Board seeking a Legal Professional with FCC Regulatory approval..

    "f. I came on the board, for the first time on any type of social media, solely because I thought maybe some regulatory attorney or other professional was on the board and had insights on the FCC rule making process, which I did not. "

    Why would anyone, let alone someone that represents themselves as a member of the Legal Profession, ever in their wildest dreams consider looking for legal opinions on an anonymous Yahoo Stock Message Board. LOL!! Did you get your law degree from Jerk'em, Jack'em and Jick'em Law School?

    Please attempt to keep the two threads on topic here.

    And so it goes,
    PCSTEL

  • " But, you raised an issue and stated, as facts, that I made "approval predictions" for the end of each quarter of 2015. I simply said I did not recall that."

    You continually made "near term approval predictions" throughout 2015.

    Do you now suddenly not recall that either?

    Your "timing predictions were wrong".. Then you said you are going to delete all of your posts on this thread and leave this message board. Why do you want to delete all of your posts? Not too proud of what you wrote and predicted.

  • " But, this post of mine was not a "prediction of approval by end of Q1" so keep trying pcs. That nice neat post of yours that I predicted approval by the end of each quarter in 2015 seems to be breaking down."

    LOL!!

    Hey, you said you were out of the "prediction business" in 2014.. Yet, the post in Q1 2015 clearly shows you making a prediction of the "end of the proceeding is near", and you continued to do so throughout 2015 and into 2016. You insinuated that you had some form of "legal experience" with proceedings like these. So far.. You are batting a big fat ZERO.. While I have always maintained that you won't see any progress until there is a regime change. While you may not have provided a prediction by the end of each quarter stated exactly as that.. The inference is correct, as you continually made prediction after prediction even after you claimed you were out of the "prediction business" in 2014..

    Did you, or did you not continue to make or insinuate "near term approval" predictions throughout 2015, and now into 2016? Were ALL OF YOUR PREDICTIONS OF NEAR TERM APPROVAL WRONG?

    So you have attempted to evade that seeking Regulatory Legal opinions on an Anonymous Yahoo Stock Message Board?? Why would someone that was involved in the Legal Industry ever in their wildest dreams seek alternative Legal Opinions on a Yahoo Stock Message Board. LOL!!

    Doesn't seem you have an answer for this?
    PCSTEL

  • "Stay focused pcs. I asked if you if you could show me my posts in which I made "approval predictions" for each of the four quarters in 2015."

    OK.. Here is Q1 2015

    "iptechpat • Feb 14, 2015 12:13 PM Flag

    Thanks for the nice recap. I'll just mention one of the most important moments from my perspective. I think I've mentioned in the past that if the facts are not on your side, it's probably not in your best interest to meet with very intelligent decision-makers. That is why we see Iridium finally. .. . . .. . . . . . . in this most recent joint meeting, the question was basically, do you want and does the country need, Channel 14 to be better utilized irrespective of Globalstar being in the space? The answer was, of course, yes. THE REASON THIS MEETING WAS SO DELAYED IS BECAUSE THE COMMISSION WANTED TO WAIT UNTIL NEAR THE END OF THE PROCEEDING to get this admission."

    Did you get that legal opinion about the FCC process from your Yahoo Stock Message Board FCC Regulatory Lawyer? So according to the "self-proclaimed" legal experts" here... the FCC delayed the meeting until near the end of the proceeding??? LOL!!

    That was more than 400 days ago..

    Good Lord, our founding fathers could have written 4 Constitutions of the United States of America in that timeframe.

  • "ee, all due respect, this is about the credibility of pcs more so than me."

    ROTFLMAO!! Hey, I'm not the one that represents themselves as having some direct/personal affiliation with professional law. But, then states he came to the Yahoo Stock Message Boards to see if he could find a "regulatory attorney with experience with FCC regulatory actions" LOL!!

    Heck, I am not a "lawyer".. (Blacksheep of the family actually) but, even I would not even consider consulting an anonymous Yahoo Stock Message Board looking for legal opinions.

    "and his ego on that front is pumped up so much so that he decided it was a good idea to come after me too."

    LOL!! Oh! No! Here comes "The Victim" speech.. LOL!! Who is coming after you? Do you consider someone questioning you about a statement that you freely made that does not make any common sense? I mean, not even 99% of lay persons would consider this concept of consulting legal advice on a anonymous Yahoo Stock Message Board. You posted a statement, and given your insinuations about your experience in legal forums, makes absolutely no sense whatsoever.

    I mean a lawyer claiming they decided to look for another "legal opinion" from a "regulatory attorney" with FCC experience on a anonymous Yahoo Stock Message Board?????

    Can you explain this? This is not about MY Credibility.. This is about YOURS!

    Now watch IPTECH squirm and turn attempting to change the subject. When you ask them common sense questions like this, they claim they are being "attacked" and play the "The Victim", just like Sat Fi.. He won't answer the actual question, but you can be sure some "character attacks" won't be far behind.

    PCSTEL

  • "Stay focused pcs. I asked if you"

    LOL!! So avoiding the question as to WHY a self- insinuated legal professional would state they came to the Yahoo Message Boards seeing if they could find a "Regulatory Attorney" with experience with the FCC on this message board?? Is that common practice among legal professionals to consult Yahoo Message Boards for external legal advise.. Please explain.. Why would a licensed law professional do this? Is that what you would recommend to a client?? Really.. Ah! Just go home and look for some legal advise from anonymous posters on Yahoo Stock Message Boards??

    I think you have some "splan'in" to do.

  • I'll keep looking in 2015 for any "approval timing predictions" that I made.

    "Reply to New GSAT Exparte by sat_fi_is_it •Feb 22, 2016 6:54 PM
    iptechpat • Feb 22, 2016 10:50 PM Flag

    Imo, these are details discussed when the end of the proceeding is in sight and the FCC staff is finalizing a draft R&O for consideration by the Commissioners."

    "How can you make that determination? You admit that you have no long term history of the FCC regulatory process, and you came on the Yahoo message board looking for a "regulatory law professional"

    PCSTEL

  • "Sat... Just admit you were wrong, apologize, and move on. But as expected, after being shown to be completely wrong on EVERY single point you turn the post into in ill mannered personal attack. "

    Sat Fi attempts to "demonize" those who call him out for the farce he actually is..

    Heck, the other day after pointing out the constellation issues and the issues with TESAM Argentina..

    He then told those reading this message board, that "I probably spend my days taking to the IGO urging them to turn off their gateways" LOL!

    What's amazing here is that everyone claiming to be doing all of this DD, but no one even calls an IGO, or sends them an email to get a idea of what their plans are. Gateway status. Coverage issues..

    They prefer to live in the "don't ask" "don't tell" stage of investing.

    PCSTEL

  • IPTECHPAT???? Say What???

    " I came on the board, for the first time on any type of social media, solely because I thought maybe some regulatory attorney or other professional was on the board and had insights on the FCC rule making process, which I did not. "

    Wait a second.. You can't be serious here.. You have made nefarious representations or alluded to via representations that you have some history practicing Law in one aspect of another.. Then you turn around and attempt to sell us the story that you originally came on a Yahoo Message Board in hopes of finding a "Regulatory Attorney" that had insights into the FCC rule making process??? YOU GOTTA BE KIDDING ME!!!

    Why would you do this if you are engaged in the legal profession?? Why wouldn't you simply use your legal network to find a qualified / pedigreed legal adviser that could provide you with a qualified opinion??

    You are really trying to sell us on the concept that you showed up on a anonymous message board looking for a "regulatory attorney" that would have no validity to verify his credentials, instead of just using your "insinuated legal network"?

    I don't know about anyone else.. But, I am call BS on all of this whole thing.. No Lawyer would consult a Yahoo Message Board for a legal opinion from some anonymous poster representing himself as a "regulatory attorney".. Heck, surprised Sat Fi has not made such a representation. I mean.. Why no add it to his list of "employment history"..

    TELECOM CORE NETWORK ENGINEER
    SATELLITE DESIGN ENGINEER
    SATELLITE CONSTELLATION DESIGN ENGINEER
    RF DESIGN ENGINEER
    IT EXPERT
    VM EXPERT
    SATELLITE CONSTELLATION ROGUE ORBIT ENGINEER
    FINANCE EXPERT
    MSS EXPERT

    PCSTEL

  • "Hey bitter doofus Iridium launches are already delayed a year."

    LOL!! No one Bitter here..

    And to straighten out the record here.. Iridium is actually 3 years behind their original prediction back in 2008.

    Which I called BS at the time. SatFi claimed, by reading articles that he should not rely on as having any factual data, that the first satellites were not produced, and that they July 2016 launch would be delayed..

    That Seeking Alpha analyst is a joke. Has NO CLUE what he is talking about. Claimed the first batch satellites were not finished. Claimed SpaceX backlog as preventing a July Launch (guy obviously didn't understand that Iridium launched for Vandy which has no back vs the Cape.

    Claims that Iridium is going to be out of business if they don't get their NEXt satellites in time because their FCC license expires in a couple years. LOL!! I guess they have never heard of a renewal like Globalstar did.

    PCSTEL

  • pcstel pcstel May 1, 2016 12:20 AM Flag

    But, but, but Sat Fi told us the first satellites were not completed a couple days ago and there would be launch delays... Told us Iridium is on financial life support. LOL! Oh no.... More Sat Fi Mythology

  • Reply to

    The Bogeyman is Going to Get You!

    by sat_fi_is_it Apr 30, 2016 3:32 AM
    pcstel pcstel Apr 30, 2016 4:48 PM Flag

    "- Read the Hughes contract specs."

    Problem is, you don't understand what you are reading in the Hughes Contract along with its options. When you don't understand what it means.. You just make up your own understanding.. and claim is is fact.

    "- They are virtually identical, however Channels 1, 6 & 11 are overlapped by microwave ovens. Channel 14 is not. That is why it is such clean spectrum, relatively, in urban settings."

    Say What? Microwave ovens operate exactly between Channels 6&11. Channel 1 and Channel 14 have exactly the same frequency separation between Microwave ovens?

    YOU ARE CLUELESS!! Got anymore mythology for us today. Clandestine Orbits.. He what about that Inamrsat Spot Beam Tracking.. LOL!!! You deleted that stuff right after you posted it.. What's wrong.. Even too far fetched for you?

    LOL.. You a joke boy.. A joke I tell you.

    PCSTEL

  • pcstel pcstel Apr 30, 2016 4:22 PM Flag

    "PC, this MB was collegial until you showed up with your fake religious attitude, street manners and deception."

    I've been here on and off since 1999.. So YOU are the one that "Showed Up"

    Sorry, you don't appreciate my viewpoints.. It would be much easier for you to pull off your "scam" if there were not technical experts like EEE, myself, and others to call you on your Lies and deceptions.

    PCSTEL

  • pcstel pcstel Apr 30, 2016 3:09 PM Flag

    "Now, soon, I will delete all my posts on this board and move on. It will be my way of putting this chapter and personal social media experience in the past."

    In other words.. You will delete any and all information that proves what a fool you were... LOL!!

    Remember, as you put this experience in the past.. The little voice in the back of your head will always be telling you... "I should have listened to PCSTEL." Don't be embarrassed... There are Hundreds of investors out there with the same voice..

    " I will continue to maintain my investment in GSAT for as long as my own thesis holds up. And, I will continue to post on the FB page which, imo, is a more professional and rational environment of debate on the subject."

    Well, it hasn't been doing so good so far.. So yes, better for you to move on the Facebook page which is occupied by the other in self-denial alcoholics.
    " Good luck to you and to all who have contributed value on this board. It has generally been a very positive and often entertaining experience."

    Adios IPTECHPAT..You have been 100% wrong up till now.. So you better skeeedadle away and delete your history that you are obviously not to proud of... I already have the board archived.. So you can attempt to delete your past errors.. But, they will always live in my archive.. You can't delete that.

    PCSTEL

IRDM
8.07+0.17(+2.15%)Apr 29 4:00 PMEDT