The sentence syntax is the same among the fake names - the Holandjoey is controlling it all. Also, that id got 60 thumbs up on a post. There has never been 60 people on this board.
You ARE the controller of the bots.. You got 60 thumbs up on a bs post - obviously controlled by you.. There has NEVER been 60 people on the board. You are without a doubt a pathetic loser - sure some here have lost some money, but you, Sir, Madame or Pre/Post op tranny - have lost you dignity. Im personally assured that you will be surrounded by - NOBODY for the holidays. Someone with the level of hate you spew - would not have people in their lives, other than a cowering dog. Fake names abound, the same syntax in the posts between the fake names.. Your syntax "print" is evident - it is you.... Ive told you my first name and where i live.. Please do the same - if you have any balls - which you DO NOT
Dont waste your time with Eeyore - he just sits back and whines.. I told him several times he does not have the stomach for Biotech investing and he should get out and but an ETF.
Somehow I surmise that you are one of those nuts that yells at the volunteer umpires at a little league baseball game. Just a hunch.
The management is ABSOLUTELY TERRIBLE - couldnt imagine worse. The trade stop and blindside for Q2 and stunned silence when asked "why not warn us" revealed amateurs at best. Also, HH, WW etal. inability to talk or think in complete sentences conveys suspicion to the street regarding their ability.
Great product, inept management - 2.6 price.
Holand has all his fake accounts shut you down.. The guy is a complete POS..
I guess we can see who controls the "Thumbs UP bot" - there has never been 60 people on this board... You are a complete POS...
Agreed... I still haven’t heard a substantive short thesis. Frankly, they were very "lucky" with the Q2 conf call - although SQNM management played right into their hands with the blindside of the earnings miss. Was that miss equivalent to a market cap loss of 200M!?! - IMHO no..
The competition is crowded, but SQNM is showing resolve in their market penetration. They are selling the GA and cutting costs with the layoffs. They dropped the 'Caid and are not giving the test away for free.
The loss of the IP (temporary anyway - we will have to see where it lands) may erode the companies value, but not to the level of losses in the market cap.
There is a tremendous potential for the stock, even if the IP is not upheld!! Short this stock? I dont understand - Tesla, JcPenny (a while back), DNDN and Rimm - yes, they got beat - and deservedly so. Maybe because SQNM is my "team" - but i dont see the kinds of mistakes and flaws in the products that these companies have.
SQNM doesnt respond to good news, responds very negatively to bad news and is very undervalued IMHO..
I understand the Mgmt wanted to keep quiet regarding their position financially prior to the Markman hearings and Illstons ruling, but now there is little reason. SQNM would be well advised to engage the PR group with conviction and actually promote their company and stock.
My guess for short interest - 28.3M...
You have been accurate in the past.. Hazard a guess - for all the Shorts out there - a guess is not a measure of competence.
I have to say, for some time, SQNM had been so red on my board throughout the day, that I finally had to watch L2 in earnest - and i would see the 5-10-15k trades chip this stock down and down..
This is long gone - the bear raid we just saw - well, it used to "stick". The bulls are dominating the board and mowing down the bears. I really wonder how much short covering has occured in the last couple of weeks...
Its one person with many bots and accounts to thumbs down. Yahoo needs to clean this up. Virtually every day, you have to flag and ignore a 2 new bots.
On small market caps (300M) you may be required to maintain as much as 100% margin call to short (depending on who you trade through).. Its not a good idea and is expensive.