"It is funny when certain Republican follks in this board complain about other posters using
several aliases, instead just one. Why should it make a difference? Makes no difference to me."
do you do it? if so, WHY??
or is it just coincidence with a few wisconsin deutschlanders showing up here ?
one more thing. in another msg you posted to me:
***you made my point for me.*** I did nothing of the sort!"
when i made that statement, it wasn't to you. it was to the guy who responded to you (pacifican). go back and follow the bouncing ball again. (and i'll concede how difficult that can be with yahoo's new format.
"You want to bet that my handle was among the five or six you mentioned on your list?"
if we were to bet, you would LOSE!!!! here's exactly what i said:
"junkie, phoenix, & methuserlaw (throw in conservativeslie, etc etc for good measure) "
you followed with :
"The word ECT (for good measure) could pertain to me, or any other poster in this board."
the "ECT (etc) could NOT pertain to you or anyone else. it pertained to ONLY
conservativeslieandbehomos!!!!!!!!!! i was being polite by not referring to the rest of his antigay i/d.
(at least i hope it didn't pertain to you)
and, yes, i know feldwebel is sergeant in english. it was my rank while serving and it was STUPID feldwebel who accused me of having never served. he's sure keeping his BFM shut since i posted my reply, hasn't he?
now, is there anything else you'd like me to clarify for you?
""In other words, the problem is being treated as one of government execution, when it’s actually one of bad drafting or overly complicated requirements that won’t go away by fobbing them off to a private company."
hey, good job!!! he makes a valid point.
now take that story and apply it to the CGI Group & obamacare. (i'll leave out the "family" connections)
yeah, yeah dimmer; i know, i know!!!!!!
jason easley rights for "politicususa" whose motto is "real liberal politics". so what else would you expect from jason easley.
now is you want the real NUMBERS try these from zap2it:
Live + Same Day Cable News Daily Ratings for Thursday, January 2, 2014
Total Day P2+ (000s) 25-54 (000s) 35-64 (000s)
FOXN 1275 239 500
CNN 364 103 165
MSNBC 406 161 214
CNBC 138 41 59
FBN 53 7 21
HLN 150 72 94
Primetime P2+ (000s) 25-54 (000s) 35-64 (000s)
FOXN 2087 359 739
CNN 661 153 256
MSNBC 622 205 342
CNBC 187 97 122
FBN 61 6 31
HLN 133 53 71
Net Morning programs (6-9 AM) P2+ (000s) 25-54 (000s) 35-64 (000s)
FOXN FOX AND FRIENDS 1071 230 525
CNN NEW DAY 198 85 120
MSNBC Morning Joe 469 225 240
CNBC Squawk Box 105 40 37
HLN Morning Express W/ MEADE 259 142 190
Net 5PM P2+ (000s) 25-54 (000s) 35-64 (000s)
FOXN FIVE, THE 2244 359 791
CNN Situation Room 492 113 255
MSNB Ed Show 513 170 256
CNBC FAST MONEY 156 56 69
HLN What Would You Do 80 30 39
Net 6PM P2+ (000s) 25-54 (000s) 35-64 (000s)
FOXN SPECIAL RPT W/BRET BAIER 2502 367 907
CNN CROSSFIRE 344 68 119
CNN Situation Room 396 87 137
MSNB POLITICS NATION 587 180 271
CNBC Mad Money 103 31 50
HLN What Would You Do 124 49 68
Net 7PM P2+ (000s) 25-54 (000s) 35-64 (000s)
FOXN ON THE RECORD W/GRETA 2204 335 776
CNN ERIN BURNETT OUTFRONT 371 68 116
MSNB Hardball WITH C. MATTHEWS 725 237 375
CNBC Kudlow Report 103 29 46
HLN JANE VELEZ-MITCHELL 103 48 64
Net 8PM P2+ (000s) 25-54 (000s) 35-64 (000s)
FOXN THE OREILLY FACTOR 2965 540 1071
CNN Anderson Cooper 360 631 173 291
MSNB ALL IN W/ CHRIS HAYES 528 189 277
CNBC AMERICAN GREED 129 49 68
HLN Nancy Grace MYSTERIES 148 45 81
Net 9PM P2+ (000s) 25-54 (000s) 35-64 (000s)
FOXN KELLY FILE, THE 2075 336 718
CNN CNN FILMS PRESENTS 622 141 246
MSNB Rachel Maddow Show 773 236 405
CNBC AMERICAN GREED 187 103 128
HLN Dr. Drew ON CALL 145 60 71
Net 10PM P2+ (000s) 25-54 (000s) 35-64 (000s)
FOXN Hannity 1212 203 427
CNN CNN FILMS PRESENTS 728 145 232
MSNB Last Word W/ L. ODONN
damnnnnx yahoo. let's try that one again:
first of all, your name wasn't one of the four on the list that i mentioned, was it? or would you like to claim one of them now as yours?
"you spend more time on politics than on financial matters."
perhaps, but i just tried to change that, didn't i? what have YOU done to change things? congratulations on your etfc succcess. why not talk more about it?
now, one more thing: what about those other deutschland friends of yours? they sure haven't said much lately; especially feldwebel who STUPIDLY, w/o basis, said that i had no military record.
what's he doing lately? doing a google search on asamara etitrea to verify the points i made?
first of all, your name wasn't one of the four on the list that i mentioned, was it? or would you like to claim one of them now as yours? they seem to be a bit reluctant to respond to that one.
you spend more time on politics than on financial matters.
junkie, phoenix, & methuserlaw (throw in conservativeslie, etc etc for good measure) ever heard of an online broker by the name of etrade???
have they ever talked about etrade? geeeez, maybe their comments would be worth something if they did.
but, maybe they don't have the spare time to do it.
another yahoo cut & paste job. let me try again:
that's right; they need to make the low $50 once & for all and get it over with.
(sorry the devil made me say that).
(i don't understand what we do that results in our msgs being cut like that)
have you noticed we've been posting here and not one of us has really come with a definitive answer.
we've posted our opinion on the possiblities (probably or otherwise) but none of us have PONTIFICATED.
if only this board displayed this kind of dialogue more often, i think everyone would be very appreciative.
selling the july 50 calls for almost 2 bucks would get you the 52 that was estimated to be the msft buyout price with a 30% premium.
but july is too far out for me to play with.
i just gave my answer earlier. i wouldn't do either.
i'd take the $1000 and buy the mar 40 calls for 2.70.
but that's easy for me to say because i'm sitting on big profits from my purchase of jan 29 calls.
genius, you bring up the point about buybacks which has had little discussion.
i can't help buy wonder why (if) yahoo continues to buyback at even higher prices, then is it because they DO know the future value as a result of the AG ipo?
or could the reason for the continued buyback (if it's happening) be to reduce the $ problems that could affect a possible a buyout or merger?
hey, i'm hardly the expert to answer such questions, but i'm certainly capable of asking the questions.
i've been waiting for you to show up.
how about answering the questions that junkie & methuserlaw seem to have missed.
what do you do in your spare time?
do you ever talk about the stock market?
do you ever invest in the stock market?
is there anything about etrade, in particular, that you like or dislike?
holdem, there are so many possibilities lurking that i think it's ridiculous for anyone to predict what the final outcome is going to be.
as far as i'm concerned the only reasonable thing to do is hold and wait for developments.
otherwise, take the money now & run.
me? i'm willing to wait. my biggest "problem" at the moment is what to do after 1/18 when my jan 29 calls expire (cost 2.94 current price 11.25). i'm beginning to look at buying the mar 40 calls which are currently around the 2.70 mark.