ok, i'll accept that and i'll also apologize for MY attitude; but, you must admit that you were the one that provoked it.
if you need to be an "equal opportunity" agitator, carry on if you must.
(breaking silence with this one and "pearl" knows why)
"New ID's. It could be that some old fools (some just too senile) aren't smart enough to but continue on with their foolishness, those who think they are always right?"
no "pearl"; it's not a matter either of being smart enough, senile or the need to be always right.
what it boils down to (for me, at least) is having the courage of my convictions WITHOUT the need to hide behind various i/d's.
that's quite unlike you, who just a few days ago posted msgs under a name different than "pearl" and even went back and your name changed as the author of those msgs. (and even did it on another board)
in your case, your reason is simply because you're a COWARD that REALLY needs multiple i/d's to hide behind.
pebble.ubetcha . 55 minutes ago
This topic is deleted.
Sort: Newest | Oldest | Most Replied Expand all replies
atya300times • 32 minutes ago
1users liked this postsusers disliked this posts0Reply
crawl back in your hole snake ..... you filthy snake ... no were're not going to keep quiet you filthy piece of slime
[video] Options Action: Bullish bet on Yahooat CNBC(Tue 5:45PM EST)
as said by the commentator
"one thing i want to point out about the price appreciation. all of this is based on optimism about the things to come. largely, that's alley baba. there is one catalyst which is why they were looking at the weeklies, rather than something longer dated. we have joe si, going to speak at that conference at 8:00 a.m. pacific time. that's may be what people are looking for. to see if the executive vice chairman is going to say the favorable things about yahoo! that yahoo! had to say about them today."
so where's this conference he was talking about?
". My low 2104 target is $45 with a high target of $50, without an announcement"
first, i don't think either of us will be around in 2104. (: D)
second, rephrase that comment about the low being $45 . (we haven't gotten there yet)
put it another way:
how much respect would you have for someone to who went to a store ONLY for the reason they knew that the LEGAL religous beliefs of the owner did not concur with their LEGAL religous beliefs and they wouldn't get served by the owner?
how would those people feel if the positions were reversed?
that's the second time yahoo has cut my msg short. here's the 3rd and last try:
"there you go...... it's not science, it ideology...
"OK, so in your opinion what IS "the biggest cause"
too few trees and too many ideological hypocrites like you.
"anyone can see you and your neocon scrum admire Putin and his strong man regime change style and oppressive society."
you need either a visit to your optomologist or a less clouded crystal ball.
thumbs down on that one.
i'm a republican and i don't contest global warming. what i contest is the argument on what is the definite cause of global warming. (disclosure: i don't believe human activity is the biggest cause)
there is no DEFINITE cause but a lot of definite opinions; none of which can or will (in my opinion) ever be proven.
how about supplying me with some links to republican opinions denying that global warming isn't occuring.
(forget all the jokes about the winter storms we're now experiencing.