I am fortunate in that 80% of my portfolio is in my Rollover. No tax consequences to be had. Was able to amass more than seven figures (my early retirement trigger in 2007) that has treated me very well since.
I do agree though that this investment is affected as you say by other's financial needs.
Solar only and announced today.....NO immediate effect on HYGS and declining scale additions authorized in the minutes.
Volume done. Not what I was looking for, but...good trading day.
Ever so much closer on the basis to even.
Sell side bias at present is above 2.05, so...
$2.00 should hold the close and we try again for higher.
One step at a time
And you need to PROVE insider position or information. VERY tough hurdle let alone all the points others have cited. I get lucky with timing every so often also and it is no more than personal networking and a great 19th hole at my CC.
My two day ago signal which failed, but I still await....
$2.01 and 10M share volume.
I am patient however, and will not be negative if that does not occur today.
While still minor upside down....I live and die by my actions.
Many more 10 cent days up lately to 5 cent limit loss days.
Trading around core is the only way I have managed this loss.
It now appears I have a shot of actually being positive by the Spring, which
was my original timeline anyway.
Investing takes work. This stock has sapped some of my energy or the past six months.
I would prefer that use of corporate balance sheet than leverage against production that can not then be capped to preserve longer term asset value.
Not sure if that addresses the question you seemed to ask.
I do miss the point of your continued presence.....
Is it spoiled grapes because you present the massive losses you booked?
Are you trying to salvage credibility by the "whoa is me" attitude?
Or are you just trollish enough to wish that kind of pain on others struggling with a difficult investment position?
In any case, PLEASE find another forum.....
A bit apples and oranges given holdings and debt service, but your point is far more on target than initial premise. Besides....percentage of management ownership makes HK a completely different animal for acquisition.
Company not as bad as yesterdays opening and not as good as the Summer hype.
In between, and my bet in the future, that equation will change.
In the meantime, if I can capitalize on over reaction statements like yours and I will do just fine.
Yesterday was a nice foursome @ Pebble day.
Not sure if I would use loquacious or pedantic. A bit much for this MB.
I fought for less than a buck returning to this stock in October, before exiting again as I did in August on valuation. Shuffling revenues to 2015 created a knee jerk reaction at the opening and hopefully I will benefit from some of that timing. Cash Flow and debt service are the new mantras of managements that will survive.
The biggest plus I can see with rose colored glasses is that there are no retail buyers in this sector at present. IF prices can hold, any buying will be insider or institutional. I like that market better than the Rah Rah / Sky is Falling nature of the last six months.
I would be ecstatic with your timing, but not going to happen. Longer term however, now that is a bet I have placed.
Now that is a valid concern. Counterparty solvency. If Russia with $400B in reserves is finding it difficult to decide how or if to support a failing economy/currency, imagine what capitalization is required to cover a hedge 100% above spot price.
Any decision I have made in this sector to date goes out the window if there is another Long Term Capital in the shadows.
Guessing with that well written answer that your education didn't teach you the difference between irony and satire either.
Read, interpret, then most importantly think, before you respond.