I'm only reading this in bits and pieces...so I'm not even sure how this comment will be taken. But why is this all about taking the high moral ground...it's just about us (humans) making silly (but, to us, important) bets with our hard earned dollars on (irrelevant, short-term) price movements...should all pets: goldfish, dogs, cats, horses, whatever be expected to be placed in their 'perfect environment'? Aren't there thousands of domestic animals (and children, for that matter) in horrible environments with (some) horrible owners (probably a 'politically incorrect' term: 'owner')
Seems to me, these animals cannot and should not be returned to the wild, obviously.
Seems like SEAS is dealing as best it can in the CURRENT circumstances.
I am confident this stock will be $16+ and will not (in the next 2 years) be below $13.
So...I'm saying, from an investment scenario, we may be 8% down from here (worst case) and WILL be up 21% (plus w divvy another 6-12%) So a likely gain of 30% from these levels in
Private Equity, Management, or a competing Amusement Company can Unlock Value.
At this price, I see a compelling argument that SEAS could SOON see a buyout at or near $20.
The valuation per park is at unseen and unreasonably LOW valuation.
Disclosure: Longer today buy about 2600 more shares, at 13.60-ish, Total long 8500 avg cost $15ish
Underwater in SEAS ;-) for now
Brexit may influence the averages, but I think we're on the verge of company specific positives that, if there's a dip it will be short lived...eyes on 8/2 eps and guidance, thinking there's a sizable upward move...feeling guidance will be the LONG anticipated positive up...and, though technically mostly irrelevant, the reverse split may put ACLS on more institutional radar AND analyst coverage, in about a week. Long almost 60,000 shares, and dry powder if needed. Good luck to all! (also buying SEAS, Seaworld...and XON, Intrexon, might be worth a look) I appreciate shared opinions and ideas, pros and cons.
Not sure how to interpret your statement? Are you implying they ARE or ARE NOT? (better than AMAT's offerings)
Plenty of positive signals. Surprised we're not above $3 yet...great, keep accumulating says me. Long almost 50,000 shares ready for the move coming, up I hope and expect. Reverse slit and then high teens soon. Thoughts? Pros and Cons welcome...quiet here on the board...
I believe we'll climb back to the $19 neighborhood...picked up calls yesterday and went long recently as high as 16.50...this moves in trends. Timing and some luck is all you need. Opinions forward from this price? (As an investment, btw, not as a philosophical view on whales in captivity)
Some stuff in their pipeline, they need a 'winner' - but I got crushed - I gambled more than I should have, in retrospect...damn
Holding almost all for a hopeful future...I need to look at the balance sheet and burn rate...Mr. Kirk lost a bunch for now...but only a drop in HIS bucket, lol
And you'll want plenty when it turns into a $12+ stock in about 3 weeks.
The reverse split has no material effect on market cap, but the institutional appeal AND coverage with forthcoming BUY recommendations will possibly take us into the mid to high teens, in my opinion.
Price before end of year could easily be $16-$20 (equivalent of $4-$5)
I'd suggest acquiring up to $3.25, better to do it now, prior to the forthcoming good news that should be expected. JMHO do your own DD and GLTA!
My best buy was this am with 1500 at 4.724...hoping we post some good green days ahead, it's been pretty ugly recently
long 10,500...with a cost basis of 5.47...some dry powder left
don't think we're gonna see 4.50, for selfish reasons I'd prefer we don't
Expect we will be above $12 by 7/1/16 (+30%) as we see the 100G migration gain momentum...volume and margins improving dramatically. IMHO, due your own DD.