I expect that Ross Moody will be named the new permanent CEO and that there will be no noticeable change in the way NWLI is run.
However, the good news is that some market heavyweights have become more interested in the financial stocks, namely the big banks and big insurers. If you look at the other insurers, you will see that they are nearing their highs for the year. Normally stocks move in groups because investors are unable to distinguish the good ones from the not so good ones. I have also expanded my position in NWLI in anticipation of an up move and because I think it is extremely undervalued.
I think Brazil should concentrate its efforts on the political corruption related to Petrobas. That should
keep them busy.
You were warned many times on this board that he was an egomaniac that you could not trust.
"How long can people wait for something to change Here?"
The Fed has held interest rates at 0% for more than six years and counting and we will have Obama for eight years. I think that they are all incompetent and the need to go. If i am correct we stand to suffer for about two more years unless something overpowers them.
I repeat myself, Genworth is a TERRIBLE company and they just released a quarterly report to prove it. They reported an operating loss and a big loss from impairment of goodwill. Well, I refuse to buy stock in companies that report having a lot of "accounting goodwill because it frequently just means that the company paid TOO MUCH when they made a bad acquisition. If you would be so kind as to look at NWLI's balance sheet you will find exactly ZERO amount of intangible assets. This is one reason why I own NWLI and not Genworth. Now you should understand why NWLI is going up and Genworth and Amazon are going down. Investing is about owning consistently profitable companies. If you think I am beating you up for your analysis about this situation, you are correct.
First, Genworth is a terrible company. It has never been very successful.
Secondly, investing is about trying to make money by buying stock in companies that make money. Amazon this year will have a net loss and NWLI will make close to $30 per share. Which one would a rational investor buy? Why would any sane person pay $300+ for Amazon and have a company that loses money when he could buy NWLI at $270 and make almost $30. The fact is that the market is finally coming to its senses. Be my guest and buy Amazon because I will probably short it again and I would be very happy to take some of your money.
I disagree. The most unusual thing about NWLI's pricing was that it got down to $125 in 2012. Even at its current price it is only about 2/3 of book value. Some stocks sell at many times book value. Look at Amazon, it sells at 15 times book value and it doesn't even make any money. I shorted Amazon to hedge my long position in NWLI and it worked out very profitably. I covered my short in Amazon after the most recent terrible quarterly report by Amazon and now I am enjoying the rally in NWLI. Look out book value, here we come.
I bot 100 shares not long ago at $239 and the same day I placed a gtc sell order at $245 which got executed yesterday. Today I placed another buy order. I am doing this in an IRA so short term gain is not currently taxable. I wonder if this will continue to work.
Well, what did you expect. Big has to travel in the style of an important CEO. You wouldn't want him slumming on a commercial jet.
He spends 20 hours per day thinking of even more ways to take advantage of his minority shareholders.
I don't think Eddie Lampert has covered himself with glory with his management of Sears and Kmart.
"Never will happen, but it does show what the market thinks of management."
NO! The market never even looks at NWLI. "The market looks at AMZN and is willing to pay almost 500 times earnings for AMZN even though AMZN has announced that it will have a huge loss in the third calendar quarter that will probably make AMZN sell at 1000 times earnings. You have to understand that the "market" can be irrational for a long time. The "market" is infatuated with internet companies and biopharmaceuticals like it was during the dotcom boom. It won't be like this forever. I have made a lot of money shorting AMZN.
Please take a look at the Retained Earnings on the balance sheets of AMZN and compare it to the Retained Earnings of NWLI. This represents the accumulated results of the two companies records. AMZN has been a public company for 16 years and never paid a dividend so the retained earnings represents its accumulated results and they have been dismal. Even though NWLI only pays a small dividend it has accumulated a very large amount of retained earnings over many years compared to its original capital. This is the true measure of success.
Well, I thought that the recent sharp decline in the price of NWLI was a good opportunity to make a short-term trade. So I bought more shares in my IRA at just below $244 and sold those same shares today at just below $251 realizing a non-taxable short-term gain of about $7 per share. I still have a large core position in NWLI that I did not change. NWLI is my only long position in what I think is a dangerously overpriced market due to the Fed holding interest rates at near zero %. I can't find anything else that I want to buy and have nearly 50% of my assets in cash earning nothing. I have covered about 90% of my AMZN short with about a 20% realized gain. I don't know what else to do while waiting for the Fed to quit persecuting savers and old folks.
Maybe NWLI will go back down again giving me a chance to reload for another short-term trade.
To NWLI true believers and value investors:
Around the end of 2013 I thought the market was getting very frothy in the tech, biotech and other momentum type stocks and that some of them were in for a decline that would probably affect the overall market. So I sold all of my stocks except NWLI. I did reduce my position in NWLI, but it is still a very large position. In order to hedge against a decline in NWLI, I decided to short Amazon.
The way I looked at it was that NWLI and AMZN represented two extremes of what a value investor would be interested in. NWLI was selling at about 9 times earnings and 60% of book value and AMZN was selling at 635 times earnings and 20 times book value. If that wasn't irrational, what is? So while NWLI has declined
somewhat off of its highs, my short of AMZN has cushioned the loss in my account. I started to short AMZN at about $385 and continued to short it as it continued to rise. My highest short trade was at $405.99.
Today I covered part of my short at $305 and made $100 dollars per share on the highest priced short trade.
I don't think 2014 is going to be a good year in the market. Some of the warning signs are as follows:
So many IPOs of companies with operating losses.
So many companies buying back enormous amounts of stock at very high prices as compared to the very few buybacks in 2009 when they could have bought back the same shares for a fraction of current prices.
Record margin debt.
Many insider sales.
Many dividend increases and companies operating at very high operating margins. (but not AMZN)
The Fed keeping interest rates at 0% going on six years.
Markets are IRRATIONAL. If this one gets back to $65 like it was in about October of 2012 I will be all over it again. Pray for more irrationality.
I don't imagine that the Gidwitz's are "happy", but they are in an industry where it has been tough to make a buck for a few years. They did manage to make money by suing their insurance company. Then there is the matter of executive compensation. James Gidwitz makes a salary of $650,000 for managing a company that as you correctly pointed out, doesn't make money. And I don't know how much they make on directors fees, retirement pay, insurance and other compensation. So I would say that the company is run for the benefit of the Gidwitz's rather than the minority stockholders.
Finally, I would say that when you look at book value, you need to deduct the amount shown as goodwill (over $7,000,000) because this company does certainly not have an exceptionally high return on its invested capital.
I owned this stock several times and I made good money by timing my purchases and sales. However, I don't own it now and I would look elsewhere because I don't think the Gidwitz's have their shareholders best interests in mind.