FUD = Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt
I read that in the WSJ in the 1980s.
There is nothing new.
All one needs to do is recognize and take advantage of stox patterns to profit.
Divide and protect your assets.
It's your life and decision, but you reduce your risk of material loss by multiple assets.
There are multiple REITs and BDCs that yield high % and increase the dividend.
Rule of 72
It will take 7.2 years to double.
Look at the math, it is more than simple.
When you posted your msg yesterday, did you know then that he purchased more shares?
I did not know when I posted the above msg. I only knew when I read allo's msg.
I do not do any more research with this stox because:
A) I have a job where I work all night. My off work energy is not a constant.
B) Allo does all (?) the research and I rely on reading allo's posts.
However, I think it is still a token purchase to illustrate to the public his personal commitment.
I want to use RXII as an example.
The stox materially increased over a week on no news. Then it overreacted and collapsed.
Earlier this week the CEO announced via S4 he bot a big 10,000 sh @ 2.18.
The next day after S4 announcement there is a PR about a patent and another PR about update on trial.
10,000 sh is only a token buy to put a stop to the overreaction.
I am expecting another imminent PR with RXII that will materially move the PPS higher, and the PPS will stay higher. I bot after the S4 announcement.
I think the same thing will happen with PSTI.
Yesterday's spike, with excessive volume, is because a lot of other traders have the same expectations.
PSTI is going to imminently release more PRs that will boost the PPS.
This is why I wrote my post the way I did. The second 30,000 sh purchase is irrelevant.
More PRs are going to be released that will materially boost PSTI's PPS.
If anyone thinks that PSTI mgmt is NOT performing, acting to make this company a long term success, then that person is wrong. Mgmt knows what it is doing and physically acts. This is what I have seen over the years.
As for the posters on this MB who intensely dislike this company, I welcome their posts.
For me, they are playing "devil's advocate". They present questions I may not have thought of.
They are beneficial for my current awareness.
Do you have a mortgage?
Whoever invented it was a genius.
Most of the mortgage payment is interest, escrow, with a small portion towards the principle reduction.
So even with a 4.00% mortgage, it is still mostly interest.
Your math is totally incorrect.
At a constant 15% yield, it takes 4.8 years to double.
The Rule of 72.
Mgmt ended the ATM because they had alternative actions on play, as we can see with the current PRs.
With this afternoon's rapid PPS increase, there are more positive PRs imminently to be issued.
As for their buying token shares, that is for appearances only. Absolutely meanmingless.
They can simply issue to themselves more stock options.
The next main question to ask is, are these PRs solely to increase the PPS in order to issue an SPO?
They have announced they need cash. What will be the source?
nickspinner, as you know from reading these messages, bot ARR materially higher, I forgot the PPS, but it could have been 6 - 7 / sh.
He is an angry investor because he has an unrealized LOSS in ARR, from his messages posted earlier this year.
Therefore, he wants to vent his anger on this MB and everyone else to avoid ARR.
In his opinion, ARR can NEVER do anything correct.
nickspinner is angry at the world!
I think one should buy ARR, at these reduced prices and other MREITS or BDCs when the stock's conditions meet your conditions and goals. I think most people are buying these stocks for long term income. Yes, some are buying for total return. I look at my monthly dividends in my different accts and think, what will I buy?
I am not looking at my past cost. Everyone has heard and knows what dollar cost averaging is.
My goal is to receive dividends five days per week and to increase these daily dividends.
DSM as in Diagnostic and Statisticak Manual?
Are you suggesting allo has a mental issue?
I can think of obssessive compulsive. A majority of people probably are.
Slick just posted about two insiders who bot more on Aug 27, one at 10.40 and the other at 10.30.
If they intend to reduce the dividend, then wouldn't these two insiders have waited until an announcement or near an announcement? They then could buy at a lower price.
Neither you nor I can guess at what price owen covered at, but he, I think, would not be holding his short position for months, if even one month.
If he did cover, my guess is he made .50 - .60 / sh.
This was not a difficult trade he decided to do.
The emotional retail traders pumped up the stox after the earnings release, then the price eroded about to where it should be now and last week.
The pattern repeats in stox after stox, no matter the industry or business.
Yes, there are some stoxs that keep on going such as AAPL.
But one can successfully play the technique owen has with ORC over and over.
I also think owen knows about his costs when shorting. It is a given.
This has been selling over BV, whatever huge %, for the last 3 years.
The only time this "deflates", is when they do another SPO. Then, it is always time to BUY MORE.
This is NOT going to "deflate" to the below BV of the mediocre competitors you are watching.
Apparently, your limited experience is dominating your logic.
Banks are not sold with per share premium as other industries stoxs are.
Banks are normally sold times book value, such as 1.5 to 2.5 x BV.
Anyone know what BV / share is?