Instead of your "trading position", I and other longs (I'm sure) would rather you characterize your position as an "accumulating" one, reilly.
I hope you understand.
I like the last sentence very much, juggsy. Much better than Planned Parenthood's harvesting organs from aborted fetuses any day.
moo: put straight01 straight into "ignore" like I'm going to do now.
He is obviously an agitator trying to stir something up. You've given him quotes from the FDA website, I assume, and he's still not satisfied.
To "H" with him, moo!
Thanks for your comments, doc.
I've sold other biotechs in the past, only to watch its share price climb 10x's or more a year or two later.
While ONVO isn't a true biotech, the liver tox assay they now sell to biotechs will be a necessary component of many biotechs and research companies, etc. going forward. Let alone other things ONVO has in its pipeline.
I'm sticking with ONVO for a long, long time. They'll have to pry my shares from my dead, cold hands in order to get them.
Sounds a little bit what happened to my several years ago, reilly. Weierd things were happening to many investors in the stock I was in then, so many investors (incl me) made up new aliases to even begin posting again.
My original alias was "stck_guy", which I couldn't use anymore for some reason. (I think the problem is resolved now though.) Anyway, I set up "profiteer" (think modern buccaneer... lol) which I have been using ever since then.
Juggsy: Our baby will be common knowledge soon enough in investor circles.
I think the downturn would have been less severe if Keith would have been more open about contract specifics. IMO, the analysts are punishing him for that.