The Board members have a timely fiduciary responsibility to uphold. They can't allow management to continue to be paid above industry norm while they don't bring in any Cash. Let's face it, this company ( patent and IP maximizer ) is only successful when cash comes in the door. In my opinion, For this Board of Directors to not tie management's compensation to the one reason they are in business. (To be compensated in Cash for their IP ) would make them negligent in their duties. ESPECIALLY WHEN THEY ARE AWARE OF A PENDING LAWSUIT REGUARDING GROSS OVERCOMPENSATION. It's time to step up folks. Have the emergency meeting and move this company in the right direction.
I wonder how many weak longs got stopped out yesterday and today?
Also, I noticed that there were a ton of 100 share sells going on.
My guess is just to tick down the bid. Not too many real investors do $330 trades.
Anyone else notice similar?
it's not really a question. These two (or one) guy is a fool who is introducing the lower that $3 / share price and $2 / share mindset after the stock lost 5% in a day and ended at $3.33. The poster thinks they are pretty clever with their mind games.
Well, let me introduce the $15 / share mindset. The news comes, shorts try to take it down. ( they always jump on the good news with sells so that the average investor is scratching his head) Then the big boys come in who know the deal will happen and will take meaningful positions. The idiot shorts are then squeezed by the professional longs and the stock price passes $6 the shorts are screaming on this board like pigs with their heads caught under a tractor, but then get roasted as the stock goes up over $8 a share. Management then declares a Cash dividend which the shorts have to pay from their pockets. The stock soon crosses $10 a share and the big institution then pile in. The stubborn shorts still have more than 15 million shares short ( there are about 20 million short now) and the roast is on. They are on the wrong side of the bet and have to unwind. Buy you short pig, buy my stock................ if you can. I might just keep it as it moves over $20 / share.
That is the other side of this fool(s) introduction of $2.90 and 1.99 / share mindset "question". Don't let the shorts manipulate you my fellow longs. Call them out and bolster your position on the dips.
Don't be the one who looks back with regret that you did not buy more shares in the $3.33 range.
It is quiet now and we know this is now a "trading" stock. Take advantage of the swings and prosper.
BlackRock Institutional Trust and Fund Advisors combined own 5% outstanding per Top Institutional Holders data.
Smarter than the poster talking about the cover over his orifice being stuck??
Facts are starting to surface
SAN FRANCISCO (MarketWatch) -- RetailMeNot Inc. SALE-19.56% said Thursday that reports about changes Google Inc. GOOGL+1.02% has made to its search-ranking technology "greatly overstate" the impact Google's moves have on the digital-deal marketplace. RetailMeNot shares fell more than 16%, to $25.90, after Google made changes to its Panda 4.0 search-ranking system that reports said eliminated as much as 33% of RetailMeNot's traffic. In a statement, RetailMeNot said, "It is too early to judge any potential impact of the latest Google algorithm change," and that about 35% of its traffic came from sources other than search engines during the first quarter of the year.
Sentiment: Strong Buy
Does anybody know what Mark's position in VRNG? (Anybody that is other than alafrickinbama. He's probably had over 200 posts today and his hands must be tired of typing). (He's probably typing posts with one hand and adding up his profits on a calculator with the other) To each his own.
Will swing lower and higher than you can imagine. As we have seen with this stock, momentum changes in literally seconds. The 25.3 Million short shares, or ~25% of float will be a factor.
Pigs get slaughtered ( both long pigs and short pigs)
Either support the stock.......... Or find a new job.
Do what you need to to increase shareholder value.
You have the power.
a shareholder (owner of the company)
Sentiment: Strong Buy
How in the world can three PUBLIC companies have a confidential agreement????
If I own ADT or Tyco , don't I have the right and obligation of the companies to disclose what of my Cash is going to VRNG ??? I would think that a confidential agreement would give an unfair edge to management who are privy to the agreement over the other owners (shareholders). How can this be????
Can Any SEC knowledgable folks please comment? What does reg FD rules dictate? Finally, if this is deemed material to VRNG, don't they have to disclose immediately?
Does anybody know??
I'm very curious about Vringo's lawsuit against ZTE in India, alleging infringement of India Patent No. 243,980
Please state source when replying. There is already far too much conjecture on this board.
For US court of appeals:
Go to Investors hub
at search type in vringo
click ticker VRNG
click "message board" on right hand side
scroll down to post 52385
listen (Mr Re is VRINGO's attorney)
Take advantage of buying opportunity before end of day.
Sentiment: Strong Buy
Really, is this news???? Did we all not know that Google was going to try to overturn the verdict today?
I sense Joseph has yet to argue the facts.
Who is he?
- Partner of His firm
- One of the 100 Most Influential Lawyers in America
- Listed in Who's Who in America
- Named as one of the World's Leading Patent Practitioners in the IAM 1000 published by IAM magazine