I've noticed Facebook posts move the stock more than the PRs which usually have had red days when they are put out. This has been true for over a month and in fact the last big move FITX had when it moved to .11 it was after Facebook posts of him at the NYSE with a thumb's up and speculators all over Facebook were saying an uplisting is imminent, the stock moved from down near 10% to up 20 in the few hours following his post. That was the precise moment I turned on FITX and started to view it as a P&D, it worked out well selling near .10 was an excellent move as it fell to .04 in the weeks following the pump of FB pictures.
Bill said they would not put out company info on Facebook without a substantiating PR. He has broken that word and restated it several times. It's absurd people don't take this as a serious red flag when the CEO can't follow his own words, restates them, then breaks them again...
Watch? It's going public it's a chance to buy another company that actually is growing a product. Seems many here choose a company built on hopes and dreams rather than tangible product very odd if you ask me especially considering FITX market cap is higher than companies already licensed and growing. Nothing good can come of that situation.
Still waiting for a response.. 10% of 350k is 35,000 at new facility.. What is on the contrary? You need to edit your article to reflect reality.
They called them for inspection about 2 months ago it was put out in a PR and the stock reacted nicely for a few days then as the weeks turned to months it has been in a downward path and will remain that way until something changes most likely some time next year, by then FITX will be nearing .02 or lower IMO.
The volume for Tweed is somewhat low because they have yet to report a quarter with sales. This next quarter will be the first quarter released after it was legal for them to grow cannabis. It will be their first chance at showing how well they are doing and to give estimates of future prospects and allow analysts to give reviews about the stock. It's still in the 1st inning many to go. I personally have done the best buying stocks when no one else wanted them. Bought TRTC, PHOT, FITX middle to late last year while they were rock bottom, I didn't sell until everyone started getting in. I imagine with TWMJF it will be similar, but I won't be cashing out such large portions, because they have staying power since their product is 100% Federally legal. The US companies wave up and down with the changing laws hype comes and goes, but eventually when it's Federally legal it will take off and not look back for years.
The form 144 picture was posted to Twitter and it is definitely real. The info will necessarily be public soon enough it just happened was filed the 14th and completed 15th.
Really you haven't seen any of them? They have been in Wall-Street several times I would post them, but Yahoo is junk and won't allow it. A simple google search is all that is needed, they have been in several main stream news articles while FITX has been in none. Yes they do trade on US exchange under ticker TWMJF.
Test growing? There is no mention of test growing anywhere. Bill posted pictures of other grow sites before deleting his FB page but they are NOT test growing that would be illegal. You people getting your info from MBs rather than real PRs from Wall-Street Journal where you find Tweed articles deserve your fate.
You seem to be implying they are not growing at Hershey plant, but they have completed numerous harvests which makes your 35,000 number impossible considering new grow site added that much to what they already have at Hershey plant. It is clear your knowledge of Tweed is VERY limited.
I know they are only growing 10% at new facility that is 35,000 square ft. How did you not understand that? My point is they just added that many feet and they have been growing at the Hershey plant for months at above 10%. You have incorrect info in your article and it needs changed.
It would be posted all over FITX news if they passed an inspection, it's not privileged information. Someone told you a blue van was there doesn't mean inspection passed. Maybe they had an inspection and they failed is why no mention on a PR. Without a PR it's a very well known FACT they haven't passed one... AGAIN if they had, they would have told you to boost PPS and keep investors informed on progress. It's sad to have to explain that....
Good post. Tweed will explode, but it won't be until after they are running at full speed which is not too far away. They have had a tough time meeting demand, but now as they ramp production to meet it, they have a chance at greatness.
It is very possible that if HC approves FITX it will only be for 10% of plant capacity as they have done with other companies, it isn't feasible to start a grow at near 100% capacity anyway and demand is quite low which is the reason for the slow response from HC to the 1,300 + applications for license.
But where is the 35,000 square foot number coming from? They just planted 35,000 new square foot starting last week in addition to what they already have growing, so it is not possible your number is correct unless they are producing nothing at the Hershey building. At last check it was around 20% or about 30,000 squre foot of current production for a total of 65,000. You are not clear in the article or in your explanation above even your 160k square feet is way off. It's 500,000 for both locations 350k at Niagra and 150k + at the Hershey plant. The numbers are wrong plain and simple very little leg work is needed to refute it.