What would happen if the earth suddenly became square and it caused our orbit to wobble? Stupid question.
Has ANYTHING changed with CRUS since yesterday? No.
Was there ANY analyst or investor on the planet who thought margins would not shrink some over time? Would that analyst be a blind fool if he thought that? Same story as yesterday - just plucking a few chickens.
Isn't that all this stock has ever traded on? Hype, message board posts,and articles written by people no one has ever heard of before?
Has UNXL made a sale yet? If you wanted to buy their product then could you?
Is it smart to invest based on message board hype and articles written by people you have never heard of?
Didn't he say in his April 25th pumping the stock article that it could double by the end of the month and that it would rally big in the next 10 days?
Has anyone ever pumped a stock more?
What if none of the pie in the sky projections that he is throwing out there ever materialize?
Has this company made a single sale of their product yet?
Do zero sales justify a 300 million plus market cap?
Isn't this down even further since this question was first posted a week or two ago?
If this is such a "hot" stock then why is it down roughly 20 percent from its high?
Have they sold ANY product yet? Don't most 300+ million market cap companies actually have sales?
Don't they have EVERYTHING riding on ONE product that they aren't even producing yet?
What happens if someone has a superior product to theirs for less money? Aren't people already claiming that is the case?
Zero sales STILL?
Could it happen?
Have you looked at the REAL NUMBERS or are you basing your investment on articles written by people pumping the stock? Ever heard of any of these people before you read their article? Do you have any way of checking the accuracy of their claims (or hype)?
You would not be foolish enough to invest based on the pumping of anonymous users of a message board would you?
Says who? You? The guy with the longunxl login? Any chance your view could be biased?
Do you think big money managers might actually be looking for a company with a product and actual sales instead?
Why do the longs just attack the shorts here?
Why do the longs ignore the FACTS in the 3/28 Seeking Alpha article that shows that UNXL's product is already sub-standard to what the competition already has on the market?
Why don't the longs tell you FACTS about what UNXL has going for it?
Could it be because this company has VERY LITTLE going for it that would support a 300 million+ market cap?
Who paid the guy that wrote the article hyping the stock price? Ever heard of that guy before?
How soon before this is a single digit stock price?
What analysts? Anybody anyone has heard of or just some guy who analyzes things? What else has he analyzed? Any chance he was paid for his analysis? if so, by who? UNXL maybe? UNXL longs maybe?
Didn't he say "daily users"?
So, based on your post you are saying that all of these people not only went through the trouble of creating accounts for themselves and their pets but they also sign on to all of their dogs and cats accounts on a daily basis?
And, 1/1000th would indicate that everyone has a whole lot of dogs and cats. In fact, EVERYONE would have to work 24/7 just to sign on to their 1000 accounts each day based on your reasoning - so I'm doubting 1/1000th is a good number. What do you think? In fact, I would think that maybe one person out of every 1000 actually created an account for their dog and/or cat - and that might be a high estimate. Also, people with dogs and cats are the target market for lots of companies - like PETM.
Given that he said "daily users" don't you think that pretty much eliminates dormant accounts too?
YIKES!!! TEN PERCENT of the people on EARTH use FACEBOOK EVERY DAY?!?!
Where did you get the 650 million number from?! That is massive!
The amount of ad revenue that can be generated from that is absurd. Should I double-up on my investment?
with earnings coming up this week? Seems like a great way for shorts to make some quick money - buying puts and pounding the table about how earnings were not good enough even if the company meets or beats estimates?
With Cramer talking over the top of EVERYONE on the show it is unwatchable - but I could watch it all day every day with Kayla Tausche on
She makes the stock market a lot more interesting that the slobbering blabbering Cramer who won't even let anyone else talk
The shareholders are the owners of the company - not management. Mr. Cook seems to be forgetting that.
Apple needs to step up and start paying the owners of the company with some of the billions they have sitting in cash. Doubling the dividend or even tripling it would have ZERO impact on the company's abilities to do whatever they want moving forward. There is no reason and no need to sit on that much cash.
Mr. Cook needs to be replaced by someone who will have the best interests of shareholders in mind - not his own best interests.
Sell this stock
Wouldn't a PE of 20+ make a LOT more sense for a company with the safety margin that AAPL has? No debt, piles of cash, THE premier company on the planet?
At some point the market will wake up and give this stock a fair valuation but who knows when that will happen?