You have been reading too many blogs. "Global warming" is a fact, but people have not made it happen and lumping everything together sounds like some freakish conspiracy theory. "Universal Health Care" is a shibboleth intended to befuddle the people while a further grab of central power occurs. The much more useful approach - starting with closing our borders to illegal aliens - would be to enable competition among insurers without regard to state borders. If the states have to acknowledge - even permit = same-sex marriages, it is much more significant to allow coverage without state limits.
These people are not progressives.
Thankfully, that's true. Your central control efforts would drag the country further down than it has already come.
But then, that's your intention.
BTW, Rockefeller is no benchmark of constitutionality and Obama's effort were driven more by support of insurance companies than by any compassion for the uninsured.
The analogy is 100% apt, stupid.
You must have had a typo problem, again: 100% in[e]pt [and] stupid.
Asking ISIS about Obama is not germane, however much you'd enjoy their support, and asking the CITIZENS [ if you could get them to talk at all] of North Korea is not equivalent to asking the party faithful.
Moreover, I think we're entitled to a little latitude on who the poll asked, with the increasing numbers of illegal aliens, and can also justify the response because at the same time, Obama himself claimed increased "respect", no doubt arising from his habit of bowing before foreign government officials.
Oh, yeah, he also authorized Seal Team 6 to get bin Laden. I understand Kerry was in Viet Nam, too.
Kim Jong-un is the most admired man in the history of the world.
How do I know? I asked a bunch of North Korean Communist party officials about it.
Aside from the utter nonsense you normally spew, this analogy is worthy of squirrelman: worthless.
Indeed, if the question were posed to acolytes bowing at the feet of the anointed one, no doubt it would come out the opposite of what the poll said.
Meantime, as a long-established thesaurustician, I can point out to you that Obama is actually correct, iff respect is a synonym for disdain or contempt..
I don't think so, but you could try to look it up.
It's so rare debka_file gets a question right, I had to check and make sure it wasn't someone spoofing his ID...
So, help me out here: what was Hersh alluding to? What "went wrong" that made Obama have to give an alternative speech. How does claiming bin Laden was dead and all our guys got home without harm turn into a "new cover story".
Obama made stuff up all the time: think of the video that had nothing to do with Benghazi, so I'm going to restrain my cheer from a muckraker like Hersh, just because he appears to have got one in a row right.
When objective NASA satellite data, reported in a peer-reviewed scientific journal, show a "huge discrepancy" between alarmist climate models and real-world facts, climate scientists, the media and our elected officials would be wise to take notice. Whether or not they do so will tell us a great deal about how honest the purveyors of global warming alarmism truly are.
"...how honest the purveyors of global warming alarmism truly are." Was there a question there?
The follow on to governmental coverage of all military operations, birth to death, is governmental control of who is permitted to wear uniforms.
So you agree the governmental control of all health, birth to death, leads to a fascist state. First sign of sanity on your part.
But I doubt it will last.
Let's get a consensus....or at least a quorum. I have not settled the answer in my own mind, thinking of possibly unintended consequences.
Will the topic that uses the phrase for those of you in Rio Linda be removed by the censorbot at Yahoo?
My apologies to this message board for using it as a sandbox to figure out Yahoo's "policy".
Why do so many people need to rediscover one of the crntral tenets of government, true since the Persians were pagans: Paraphrasing Jefferson, any government that can give you all you want, can take away all you are.
The follow on to governmental coverage of all health, birth to death is governmental control of who is permitted to give birth. The Progressives have never given up...but only changed tactics. The new guidelines for the electorate: majority fools.