Care to explain why you think a post that is over 6 years old is relevant today? I guess you aren't smart enough tot come up with your own reasons so you have to go to non-relevant historical posts?
BTW go back and read the whole post that I made on Jan 27 at 4:27 PM... especially the parts that the LYING TROLL fail to quote....ever!
How does that prove anything except that you scroll the board. After all if my responses to your posts scroll the board it is only because you had made so many posts for me to reply to! And where is there any lie in that post except YOUR FALSE claim "proving yet again it is a lying robot...." .
(BTW notice how is he trying once again to change the subject LOL! LOL! LOL!
UILT lie #1 "...its long rants trying to deceive that Material Events are not required to be publicly announced." Never said that at all, I said that stage-2 qualification is not a material event. SEC 8-K requirements, for anything other than a Regulation FD event (which applies in very limited circumstances not including stage-2 completion) mandate that a form 8-K be filed. There was no such filing because it is not a material event"
Lie #2) "stated prior to the public announcement of the stage-2 qualification that it would be publicly announced." Nope he stated it was an SEC 8-K requirement because is was a "material event" and repeatedly referred to broadest most vague definition of what a material event really is. The instructions for SEC 8-K are much more specific but he avoids that reality like the plague." It's interesting that when he quoted from my post of JUn 15 he omitted the part where I stated something like 'but receipt of a stage 3 order would be." He doesn't like to quote that because he later lied about that too! BTW that post is a great post to read, because I explained in that post the particulars of why I believed that stage 2 qualification event was not material.
The last quote of the STI PR is really laughable because a PR would only apply to a "material event" that was resulted from a Regulation FD event. The qualification of the Roebel cable was not a regulation FD event and the LYING TROLL has never been able to cite any other section within the 8-K instructions that would require such an activity to be reported.
Lie # 3) His post of Jun 15, 2015 10:48 PM that he loves to keep posting is a lie. I know nothing of the sort and have repeatedly and consistently posted my belief about this type of event. The use of a PR to publicize is actually proof positive that such events are not material because unless the disclosure was made privately to the financial community members it would required and 8-K to be filed. None was filed!
Numerous old posts about my comments re Kopp! He's trying to evade and avoid the fact that once again I have revealed his deceitful tactic about what is and is not material, specifically about his totally false reliance on Regulation FD as well as his outright lies about me and what I have supposedly said.
I do appreciate this because I can use each opportunity to illustrate what a liar and fraud he is!
So I wonder how many aliases he uses to post on this board... It is clear that his attempts to falsely discredit SCON is indeed a boilerroom agenda!
GEt Real well hidden? Nope not at all!. As many of the bashers here have commented on I followed a stock of ISCO (aka ISO) who was a competitor of STI. I made many posts on the ISO board hear on Yahoo and on the old Raging Bull board as well as the Motley Fool board. I used one alias (r2d2_n_3cpo) on each and every board. The entire ISO board and the many posts I made on that board were deleted by Yahoo when the company was taken over by its creditors (and is quite successful now also). Likewise many threads on this board have been deleted by Yahoo, particularly those threads started by foul mouthed bashers whose accounts were TOS'ed. If you look hard enough you will like find some of those old posts on the SCON board, but most were made on the old ISO board.
Remember the LYING TROLL has no real interest in finding those, because they would prove that I'm right. And he certainly doesn't want to do that. He is also counting on the likelihood that nobody else would be interested enough to do the search. Remember he is a proven liar... he tells lies...deliberately... why should you ever believe anything that he can't prove.... and HE HAS NEVER PROVEN ANY OF HIS FALSE CLAIMS WITH CONCRETE TANGIBLE EVIDENCE... his so called proofs always require a leap of faith and you must also guess at what he is trying to prove.
I can only conclude that because 4 1/2 years ago I truthfully acknowledged that I had used other aliases and defined the general circumstances for their use, that these posts somehow "prove" in his twisted mind that any new alias that disagrees and criticizes him for his obvious lies and distortions is automatically a new alias of mine! That pretty sick (aka paranoid) and very lame... it doesn't offer proof of anything except what I said in that post.
Where is your proof that the task has not been completed. Lack of positive proof means your ridiculous claim is nothing but a lie. BTW STI production and delivery is not a "task" that has an overall completion date as each order is different. Different in requirements and quantity. Delivery against one order is a completion event, but the process of manufacturing and delivering to other customers continues. "Task" as is being used by the LYING TROLL is a never ending nebulous nothing! LOL! LOL! LOL!
Also please note how I've once again gotten under the skin of my little dummypuppet by exposing him for the liar and fraud that he is! He went into a posting frenzy last night scrolling the board.
Now, let's look at those 5-6 year old posts of mine about Kopp. He had to go way back into ancient history for those! Wasted a lot of his time IMO. Imagine that Kopp has stuck with STI for all this time investing many millions of dollars, both his and his clients. Even with all of that history, Kopp is still buying.... that fact certainly strengthens the case for STI. With his ownership percentage being so high, it is clearly in his interest for STI to succeed.
Kopp and the other investors holding warrants have to balance the effect on their warrant and stock value against STI seeking funding from other sources. It clearly is not in their financial interest to have their millions of shares diluted further, particularly when they can convert some of their warrants and keep STI going.
BTW, his story about delamination is bulldung! Let's see him cite some VALID reference to back up that statement.... just don't hold your breathe waiting for it! Never is a long time!
The UNMASKED IDIOTIC LYING TROLL is creating things in his deranged mind. I never talked about weight... he did in his prior post. The only thing I stated was a general reference to an earlier article stating that HTS wire was needed to make 10MW generators and larger. I never stated why.
Now what's funny is that the LYING TROLL apparently doesn't comprehend that centrifugal force, like all forces depends on the mass (under gravity we talk about weight) ..Mr. Isaac Newton's law of force declared that F=MA (F=force, M=mass, A=acceleration). A rotator is always under acceleratin because it is constantly changing direction... and the force from such motion is called centrifugal force. Weight is the force of a given mass due to gravity. Man this dude is really ignorant AND stupid!
This is from another place on the SEC website, that shows that the instructions for form 8-k were modified as a result of SEC adoption of Reg FD.
" Final Rule:
Selective Disclosure and Insider Trading
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
17 CFR Parts 240, 243, and 249
Release Nos. 33-7881, 34-43154, IC-24599, File No. S7-31-99
Selective Disclosure and Insider Trading
AGENCY: Securities and Exchange Commission.
ACTION: Final rule.
SUMMARY: The Securities and Exchange Commission is adopting new rules to address three issues: the selective disclosure by issuers of material nonpublic information; when insider trading liability arises in connection with a trader's "use" or "knowing possession" of material nonpublic information; and when the breach of a family or other non-business relationship may give rise to liability under the misappropriation theory of insider trading. The rules are designed to promote the full and fair disclosure of information by issuers, and to clarify and enhance existing prohibitions against insider trading.
EFFECTIVE DATE: The new rules and amendments will take effect October 23, 2000.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Richard A. Levine, Sharon Zamore, or Jacob Lesser, Office of the General Counsel at (202) 942-0890; Amy Starr, Office of Chief Counsel, Division of Corporation Finance at (202) 942-2900.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Securities and Exchange Commission today is adopting new rules: Regulation FD,1 Rule 10b5-1,2 and Rule 10b5-2.3 Additionally, the Commission is adopting amendments to Form 8-K."
Poor mentally deficient UILT can't seem to understand that the SEC instruction for Reg FD in an 8-k is simply defining the section reference an 8-k must reference when an 8-K is used to make a Ref FD disclosure. However REg FD also allows PR's or other means (such as a website presentation like STI recently did).
But the UILT is simply to stupid (or malicious) to admit that Ref FD only applies in very special circumstances'
Also from the SEC website:
" Regulation FD addresses the selective disclosure of information by publicly traded companies and other issuers. Regulation FD provides that when an issuer discloses material nonpublic information to certain individuals or entities—generally, securities market professionals, such as stock analysts, or holders of the issuer's securities who may well trade on the basis of the information—the issuer must make public disclosure of that information. In this way, Regulation FD aims to promote the full and fair disclosure."
His twisted and distorted rationale doesn't apply because it doesn't meet the basic criteria for Reg FD!
One more thing.. that statement was made in May... please provide POSITIVE PROOF that it has not been completed! I can offer prove that perhaps it has... since you like to use the absence of any statement by JQ as proof of whatever nonsense you are claiming try this.
The UNMASKED IDIOT LYING TROLL (UILT) failed to notice a significant thing in the most recent CC. For the last coupl of years or so, JQ, in his opening remarks, talks about new customers and deliveries to existing customers in quantitave terms.... In the most recent call, there was NO MENTION of ANYTHING regarding the number of customers, what stages they were in, deliveries etc...
Using the UILT's logic, that must mean that they have delivered everything they needed to deliver to their customers.. and have thus "utilized" the output of their production machine to meet their customer's requirements! LOL! LOL! LOL!
Perhaps it is because there are many customers that he is delivering to... in such a case he may never be complete...lots of customers...lots of deliveries...lots of wire.... and with the UNMASKED IDIOT LYING TROLL lots of lies!
See I told you his ignorance of English is profound... I wonder what he thinks '..ON RARE, RARE OCCASIONS, BUT NEVER ROUTINELY... means? Yet my little dummy puppet quotes this routinely whenever ANYBODY who disagrees with his lies makes a post. What an IDIOT he is!
Which of course is even more significant because when KIA purchases shares it means they are spending their clients money... and they want their clients to be happy! So folks why does the UNMASKED IDIOT LYING TROLL ignore such an obvious factor.... If anybody here is being paid it must be he...especially if, as he claims, he is not a big time losing investor!
I love it when he posts quotes from "analysts" who can't remember what the application is e.g. "fault meter customer"... when that have heard the term "fault current limiter" many ten's if not hundred's of times... their attention span appears to be the same as the UNMASKED IDIOT LYING TROLL who just can't get anything right...
Boy talk about the LYING TROLL being paranoid. Anybody (who are obviously intelligent and thinking individuals) who criticize the UNMASKED IDIOTIC LYING TROLL for his lies and distortions automatically is supposedly another alias of mine... Clearly he is a troubled sick minded individual.. a real paranoid schizophrenic.... must also suffer from bipolar!
Hey Lying troll! Anybody with a modicum of intelligence can smell the bull dung you spew out in every post! Of course the "modicum" part does not apply to MrBogusoutrageous or dorkheadjohnson!