would have the guts to show his face. I saw some good boxing but the coward never showed. What a p"ussy"! A real yellowbelly coward...talks big, but is empty inside. I've encountered this cretin before and he's always the same.. big mouth, small brain and tiny peanis (sic..intentionally)
Yup, as usual, the UNMADKED IDIOT LYING TROLL is indeed a LYING TROLL!
You will note that NOWHERE IS THE TERM "CRITICAL CURRENT" shown which is why unmasked is such an idiot
So let's make sure we get this right. You would have us believe that you've been short since last May (the last time the stock price was above $4) and the stock price fell last August to $1.44...and YOU DIDN'T COVER? Thanks for the opportunity to prove what a monstrous liar you are....either that or you are one of the stupidest shorters in the market! LOL! LOL! LOL! I think it is the former (a monstrous liar) since we all know you are nothing but a paid basher hireling and with what you are paid, you can barely keep up with your bills! LOL! LOL! LOL!
Look at the coward try to avoid responding to my post. I gave him an alternate location and he can't even be man enough to acknowledge that. Then in a later post he (being really stupid) said he would post his own address and telephone number and I said sure go ahead and I would give him a call. But did he? NO! Of course not! He realized how idiotic a statement he made and now he's challenging me to post mine? Sorry, unlike him. stupid I'm not. But it is clear he will continue to avoid accepting the alternate location, because he knows I will show up there and he won't! And I will kick his butt big time. What an empty headed blowhard he is! A typical big mouth small brain teeny weeny coward. What a #$%$!
Now it's 7 days and the yellow bellied coward is still in hiding.
Oh yeah! I would agree with this subject line. Especially empirescamming....the biggest MORON ON YAHOO!. He's also a yellow belly coward and a phony. This cretin claimed to be CEO of a company AND an EX-USMC officer.... that's really funny because he wouldn't survive 1 day in USMC boot camp and he's too ignorant to ever be an officer. He's also a coward.... he challenged me to a "fight". I gave him a location I thought would be good....unfortunately , and unbeknownst to me that facility had changed its business model...and the coward that it would be a good opportunity to back out of his challenge. Unfortunately for him I gave an extremely viable alternative...and guess what...this puzzy has ignored that post and pretends he's a champion when in reality he's nothing but a teeny weenie putz! LOL! LOL! LOL!
Come on COWARD, LIVE UP TO YOUR BRAGGING and get your #$%$ kicked bigtime.
BTW empirescamming is nothing more than a paid basher earning pennies a post... He's also likely a high school dropout...and yes... he IS A YELLOW BELLY COWAZRD! I can't wait to whip his adz!
LOL! LOL! LOL!
Oh please do leave your address. The real one of course and not like the idiot basher a few years ago gave his address as an empty lot in Brooklyn. hmmm, it might have been his address after all. Perhaps he was living as a homeless person. Leave a phone number as well, and I'll be glad to give you a call. We can have a nice "chat". LOL! LOL! LOL!
BTW if you are going to post on-line and pose as a company CEO or ex-USMC officer, at least you should learn to write in American English.
Now it's 6 days and the coward hasn't acknowledged my post. I can only guess he is nothing but an empty-headed big mouth and a coward. All talk and NO ACTION. You know what they say, big mouth = small brain = tiny pe*is. But I don't get too excited about all this, after all a quick review of his posts reveals he's nothing but a paid #$%$ basher... and let's also not forget.... a yellow-bellied coward!
I'm sorry sconfailure, once again you have failed. YOu once again demonstrated your inability or failure to read and comprehend what was written. In my post I simply cited what was in the 10K. Here is a direct quote from the top of page 16):
"As of December 31, 2013, we had outstanding options exercisable for an aggregate of 91,738 shares of common stock at a weighted average exercise price of $44.18 per share and warrants to purchase up to 11,088,430 shares of our common stock at a weighted average exercise price of $3.22 per share."
I then pointed out YOUR ERROR claiming that there were still 11 Million in warrants outstanding. The figure in the 10K was, as stated "As of December 31 2013." In the meantime 1.4 Million have been exercised thus the figure is down to 9.6 million... But the strike price is $3.22/share. So the only way dilution will occur is if the stock price goes up...
BTW for the record I don't recall you ever being right about anything. Care to be specific with time and date citations for those posts and identification of the call upon which you are basing you claim?
Methinks thou doust protest too much!
Sorry I was clearly 100% right. If you can't bother to read posts, or for that matter, the topic list where it was clear that nothing had happened, it is VERY CLEAR YOU ARE BOTH STUPID AND IGNORANT! The only one who has made an ADZZ of himself is you! You attribution of avatars e.g., Muhammed Ali (use capital letters for names you ignoramus) loudly proclaims your sentiments. One paid shill for another! I like to think I'm more like Rocky Graziano.
And sonny boy, I've made more money on STI than you can imagine! The real losers are paid shills like yourself, empirescamming (aka jb0thoo7), oopppsssterits, etc, etc, etc. You are all soooo stupid and sooooo ignorant! LOL! LOL! LOL!
I guess he really is a coward... ignoring that post I made 5 day's ago.
Not yet, the coward, empirescamming, didn't really call Golds, he just looked them up on the internet. If I had looked them up I would have known they were closed. And actually I did find out that the facility is still there, it is just operating under a different name. However the new facility isn't suitable for such an event. I did give an alternate location which the scammster can now call and make the arrangements he started to make for Gold's. But he is notably silent about that. Typical for a coward. And your question reflects upon your ignorance and inability to read! LOL! LOL! LOL!
I see you haven't called that alternate location and have ignored my posts... OK, well then we now know who the REAL COWARD IS ...empirescamming!
You'll see this is all part of his stupid and very obvious tactics.
He can't refute anything in that post, so he tries to change the subject to something totally irrelevant and then shouts in triumph when I don't play his silly games. He then lists his fictitious claims about what I supposedly claimed. All of which have been amply refuted and aren't worth revisiting.
Let's see if he can answer one simple thing. He made a claim about insulation thickness more than doubling for an increase in twice the voltage. I proved him wrong and he claims my post was a misinterpretation of the data and that I spun the facts. So "fool" what data did I misinterpret and what is your interpretation about how you were wrong on the insulation thickness more than doubling....and how did I "spin" those facts.
you may well LMAO but I didn't see you refute one statement... As usual you simply post an empty and totally unsupported claim that I misinterpreted what I read... That's because you know I'm absolutely correct and there is nothing you can refute. For example you claimed "To double the voltage you need to more than double the thickness of the insulation layer" And I proved that statement to be totally false.
Let's see you support your claim using that NKT table data before addressing anything else!
I also gave a detailed and accurate description of that NKT HTS cable and it's parameters described in the tables. The only statements you could make about any supposed mistakes I made would be totally fictitious and completely unsupportable mumbo jumbo! Tell us do you arms ever get tired from all that arm-waving?
LOL! LOL! LOL!
In trying to conclude I commented that he always makes disparaging remarks and comments to the effect I couldn't be right. My style is different. I use facts which can be backed up with real sources and show how the facts contradict his claims. I then cite his post of last May (31) at around noon in which he denied the principals of electromagnetism. I proved that he was incorrect, as I always do. This is a digest of a very eloquent and erudite post which Yahoo refused to post. Let's see if this one gets past their censors.
Part 3 continued from prior post
So let’s do some simple math facts for the “fool”.
The thickness of the electrical insulation increased only 26.7% overall going from 13.6kV to 39kV rating (an rated voltage increase of ~287%), and only 14% going from 39 kV to 72kV (185% voltage rating increase) and if we compare the change going from the lowest 13.6kV to the highest 72 kV (a rated voltage increase of ~529%) the overall insulation thickness increased only 44%..... VERY VERY far from that claimed by the “fool”!
Now if we examine the effect on cable core outer diameter as we increase current at any voltage level we significantly higher % of increase. At the lowest voltage before the screen dimension flattens out we see that for an increase eof 272% in current rating the cable core outer diameter increases 51%. At the next two higher voltage rated cables the increase is only 28% and 25% because the screen cross sectional area has not longer increased and the increasing diameter reduces the effect of the cross sectional area growth of the copper stabilizer. In any case they exceed the anemic increases from increased voltage.
I presented this same information in an earlier series of posts. I guess he thought I wouldn’t do it again to show what an utter fool he is. Now watch him make some phony and superfluous claims about what all these parameter really mean…all his own idiotic creations of course….or perhaps he will introduce some new irrelevant aspects… it would be very typical.
Conclusion continuing from prior post
(part 2 continued from previous post)
As you can see in the first chart this outer diameter of the inner core grows from 45 mm to 68 mm as the current increases. There is no increase in the insulation thickness because the voltage is constant. You will note that the ID/OD of the outer corrugated tubing must also grow larger as the inner core diameter increases but there is not always a corresponding increase at each current level in this outer tube even though the inner core may increase. I speculate this may be to reduce the fabrication costs by maintaining fewer sizes and the extra volume can be consumed by additional cryocoolant. You’ll see that there is no change in these ID?OD dimensions going from table 2 (21/36kV) to table 3 (42/72kV)cables. That’s because the ID parameter can accommodate the cable core outer diameters for both applications.
In the first table where the voltage rating is 7.6/13.2 kV, the inner core overall diameter increases from 44 mm to 68 mm across the entire current range with only a single increase on the outer tube ID/OD when the inner core diameter increase to 62 mm.
Now the second chart shows the cable voltage rating changed to 21/36kV which is almost a 3 times increase in voltage. At the lowest current, the inner core overall diameter increased from 44 to 57 mm while at the highest current it increased from 68 mm to 73. The cryoflex insulation layer increased from 2.1 to 3.4 and increase per layer of 1.3 mm. Given there are 6 layers of this insulation it added a total of 8 mm to the cable diameter
In his post the “fool” claimed:
“To double the voltage you need to more than double the thickness of the insulation layer which is about an order of magnitude bigger than the thickness of the HTS wire.” WRONG!!!!!
As we can see neither of those two claims are supported by the data in these charts, even considering that there are six layers of the electrical insulation.
Oh not that old debunked argument again. The growth in the cable diameter due to increased current is not solely due to the HTS wire. Search for "HTS-Triax_engl_061108" and download their data sheet for their HTS Triax cables. On page 3 of the data sheet you will see a nice cut-away picture of the construction of their cable. Two of the labels, "C" and "CR" are obviously misplaced in the figure. There is an inner spiral metal core around which the first HTS wire layer is wrapped. There is then a layer of Cryoflex electrical insulation followed by a copper stabilization layer which provides over- current protection followed by another layer of Cryoflex insulation. There are three of these layers each of which is subsequently larger in diameter than the previous. The HTS conductor layer is made thicker by increasing the number of layers in the wrap to increase the current capacity. The current capacity of the copper stabilization layers is determined by the total cross sectional area of these components. For these copper stabilizers at a given current capacity each successive layer gets thinner but the net cross sectional area is the same for each stabilizer layer. The screen layer gets thinner as the diameter of the inner components increase. The insulation thickness is an absolute thickness regardless of the diameter of the cable within it. There are three charts in the brochure each one applicable to a given voltage rating. The cryo-coolant flows through two channels in the cable: the inner corrugated pipe in the center of the cable and over the entire cable core (characterized in size by the parameter "Outer cable core diameter".) The coolant is channeled by the outer corrugated tubing which has thermal insulation to minimize heating of the coolant from the exterior. Thus the entire inner cable core must fit within the outer covering and allow for coolant flow. The outer tubing inner (ID) and outer diameter (OD) are given in the chart. (to be continued)
I wonder what web page the "fool" copied that information from. Of the conclusions are totally his own twisted and distorted view. He can't provide any proof of anything he claims...he's done this repeatedly, but occasionally he steps on his dork and make a total misstatement about something that is scientifically factual.