Recent

% | $
Quotes you view appear here for quick access.

Superconductor Technologies Inc. Message Board

r2d2_n_c3po 132 posts  |  Last Activity: Apr 29, 2015 11:42 AM Member since: Nov 2, 1999
SortNewest  |  Oldest  |  Highest Rated Expand all messages
  • r2d2_n_c3po r2d2_n_c3po Feb 7, 2015 4:54 PM Flag

    Nothing confuses me. about those statements. Why didn't you cite the CC that JQ made that statement? Too old and outofdate1980? LOL! LOLL! LOL!

  • Reply to

    HTS REBCO finishing

    by mask_ipx_spx Feb 6, 2015 3:22 PM
    r2d2_n_c3po r2d2_n_c3po Feb 7, 2015 4:52 PM Flag

    Nothing, only your lies

  • Reply to

    Volume preceeds price.

    by dia76ca Feb 5, 2015 7:52 PM
    r2d2_n_c3po r2d2_n_c3po Feb 7, 2015 4:52 PM Flag

    Oh I know at least once answer to that question I asked in May 2010, long before anybody should have invested... that would be outofdate1980 aka mask_ipx_spx. Yep he sure was dumb enough to do that and you know what... he lost his butt.... all due to his own stupidity! LOL! LOL! LOL!

  • Reply to

    Cable demo project delivery

    by mask_ipx_spx Dec 29, 2014 4:42 AM
    r2d2_n_c3po r2d2_n_c3po Feb 6, 2015 8:39 PM Flag

    Please quote the post where "r2d2_n_c3po's argument that strands of 100m lengths were obligated" and what proof do you provide for your obvious biased lie the "had no merit and it continues to make arguments that have no merit." What claims would those be and what facts (not opinions) can you offer to support those statements. I expect you will change the subject and avoid any answer to these questions. Your avoidance is absolute proof that you statements are as empty as your head and as worthless as your claim to be honest and truthful!

  • Reply to

    Volume preceeds price.

    by dia76ca Feb 5, 2015 7:52 PM
    r2d2_n_c3po r2d2_n_c3po Feb 6, 2015 8:34 PM Flag

    Past performance is no indication of future results... but STI has changed for the better. They do have a new direction and they are making steady progress to their goal, although the road forward is frequently bumpy!

  • r2d2_n_c3po r2d2_n_c3po Feb 6, 2015 8:33 PM Flag

    The UILT is the obivious liar. He has proven nothing. What is the lie he originally called on. Where is his proof. The statements of JQ? There is absolutely nothing to prove his assertion that no parts were ordered. In fact he called me a liar in the same post where I did IMO and he quoted it.

    Here is the specific statement I made before the post where he said I lied.
    " e.g. STI has started ordering certain long lead parts for the second production RCE machine. JQ SAID AS MUCH in response to a CC question. Now why would the UILT stupidly lie about this?"

    So where is the lie? JQ did say something to that effect and in the next post I clarified the specifics of what he said ... do you know why? Because in his post where the UILT referred to the first statement that JQ had made "..., "looked at" does not equal "pre-purchasing"
    and in the response to that post I acknowledged that I could agree with the UILT, that that specific statement was not an indication but that the second part which I quoted was an indication that they had started to order something."but "...we're doing a little bit of pre-staging and trying to prepare ourselves a little,.." does IMO!"

    He has unequivocally claimed that STI has not ordered parts. The entire thread started on that premise! Then Japan indicated he thought otherwise and I did to0. The fact that my initial assertion in defense of Japan didn't have IMO is irrelevant. His statement that no parts have been ordered is the real lie because there is absolutely no evidence for that statement .... on his anger at STI.... the crybaby infant!

    He UILT do you realize how stupid this series makes you look... and how dishonest and deceitful... of course you don't give a darn.... and neither do I. What I can and will continue to do is illustrate your petty childish behavior so that no new arrivals to this board will have any doubt about just who and what you are! LOL! LOL! LOL! My little dummy puppet! LOL! LOL! LOL!

  • r2d2_n_c3po r2d2_n_c3po Feb 6, 2015 5:18 PM Flag

    Are you back on that nonsense again. You even quoted my post where I state IMO... but you now leave that out. Our deliberately deceitful UILT...my little dummy puppet constantly makes a fool of himself. The fact is that the UILT claims they did not purchase anything without ANY PROOF! Where is his IMO?
    Here's his post where he quotes my post that I stated IMO.

    "Reply to JQ announces that STI will be positive cash flow in 2nd half by mask_ipx_spx •Jan 13, 2015 5:44 PM
    mask_ipx_spx • Jan 27, 2015 8:11 PM

    As claimed in the post these posts are replying to, "THE LYING TROLL has a tendency of making things up." is a very polite understatement.

    In this thread:
    r2d2_n_c3po: "e.g. STI has started ordering certain long lead parts for the second production RCE machine. JQ said as much in response to a CC question. Now why would the UILT stupidly lie about this?"

    mask_ipx_spx: "THE LYING TROLL caught in another lie, "looked at" does not equal "pre-purchasing"." (See 2014Q3 SA CC transcripts)

    r2d2_n_c3po: "Now why is the UILT lying about me so-called lying. As I stated earlier "looked at" indeed does not imply they purchased some part, but "...we're doing a little bit of pre-staging and trying to prepare ourselves a little,.." does IMO!"

    So he claims I never said IMO...yet he quotes in his own post.. stupid is..stupid does...and that characterizes the UILT! He's precisely stupid

  • Reply to

    Volume preceeds price.

    by dia76ca Feb 5, 2015 7:52 PM
    r2d2_n_c3po r2d2_n_c3po Feb 6, 2015 4:23 PM Flag

    I think the lack of trading may be a very positive sign that indicates that SCON investors are holding tightly to their shares and are confident that positive news is forthcoming in the near future. JMHO!

  • Reply to

    Cable demo project delivery

    by mask_ipx_spx Dec 29, 2014 4:42 AM
    r2d2_n_c3po r2d2_n_c3po Feb 6, 2015 4:21 PM Flag

    It doesn't matter in which view anybody looks at your posts. They are always total nonsense and full of lies, except when you specifically and fully quote valid information. LOL! LOL! LOL!

  • Reply to

    HTS REBCO finishing

    by mask_ipx_spx Feb 6, 2015 3:22 PM
    r2d2_n_c3po r2d2_n_c3po Feb 6, 2015 4:18 PM Flag

    "... The superconducting layer can also be coated with any of a variety of materials that can serve a useful purpose. For example, a non-superconducting metal layer may be applied on the superconducting film to protect the film, such as for corrosion resistance. Alternatively, a coating (e.g., metallic, polymeric, plastic, rubber, paint, or hybrid) can be applied onto the superconducting layer to provide, for example, electrical or magnetic insulation, or a certain level of rigidity or flexibility."

    That is an extract from US patent 20120264612. You are also not a chemist. You should explore what reactions occur with water (H20) and Carbon Dioxide (C02) and YBCO. Those compounds are mentioned specifically because they are in the air. But note the other NON-STANDARD layers that may also be applied, most of which are not metals.

    Oh and of course we know yo are not an electrical, chemical or any other kind of engineer. You don't even know the difference between a millimeter and a micron.

    BTW without a source for your information, it can only be considered as reliable as its known source...aka YOU... that gives it zero credibility. Since you are hypecritical when folks don't use quotation marks, one might ask why you eliminated them. Perhaps you "interpreted" and "revised" the original.

    BTW Your purpose in posting that is truly unclear, because nothing in it disputes anything that I have posted! Thanks for the support! LOL! LOL! LOL!

  • Reply to

    I'm glad the UILT has finally come clean

    by r2d2_n_c3po Feb 4, 2015 8:14 AM
    r2d2_n_c3po r2d2_n_c3po Feb 5, 2015 5:03 PM Flag

    Gee thanks for showing how stupid you really are.! LOL! LOL! LOL!

  • Reply to

    Cable demo project delivery

    by mask_ipx_spx Dec 29, 2014 4:42 AM
    r2d2_n_c3po r2d2_n_c3po Feb 5, 2015 5:02 PM Flag

    I think the "fool" has misunderstood my comments. I have said the requirements weren't finalized. They had an idea...but it did not work. I also suggest he read the CC transcripts and see the references JQ has made to customers finalizing requirements.

    The fools claim that the Cable OEM should understand everything is another moronic claim. They are developing a new product, cap layers are specialized for HTS wire, and other than those layers that the manufacturer offers as his standards, everything else is non-standard. Clearly the "fool" has never been in a product development environment especially as an engineer. And based on all of his demonstrated technical ignorance that any mechanical engineer should know, the chance that he actually has a mechanical engineering degree from a legitimate and accredited engineering school is nil!

  • Reply to

    Cable demo project delivery

    by mask_ipx_spx Dec 29, 2014 4:42 AM
    r2d2_n_c3po r2d2_n_c3po Feb 5, 2015 4:54 PM Flag

    Speaking of meaningless drivel and the "fool" arrives.
    This "expert opinion" from a claimed to be mechanical engineer who didn't recognize the term " dissimilar metals" and actually thought I was doing some sort of comparison...bwaaahahahahahaha, and that's only one example of dozens of errors he has made. Or how about his claim the are going to solder a copper strip to the HTS material.... wow, get out your soldering iron "fool", this I gottta see... or how about they are going to assemble the HTS cable material inside a cryostat"... Or that triaxial HTS cable from Southwire has to be pulled through a cryostat, that the cryostat is NOT built around the cable.... Now think about this. commercial HTS power cables are planned to be made in lengths of either 1 km or 1 mile. Can you imagine trying to pull such a cable through even a km of cryostat.... That claim is moronic! Welcome back "fool", I see you responded when I pulled your strings.

  • Reply to

    I'm glad the UILT has finally come clean

    by r2d2_n_c3po Feb 4, 2015 8:14 AM
    r2d2_n_c3po r2d2_n_c3po Feb 5, 2015 3:38 PM Flag

    Get ready to provide the UILT wrong once again:

    harry2big4u

    by testes1961 • May 3, 2000 6:39 PM Remove
    Of course! Any dunce (see you prove that) knows
    about Alcatel. But the point is that what they bought
    (remember the subject of your post) was an HTS WIRE
    company. The equipment, processes, applications have
    NOTHING to do with HTS FILTERS! Alcatel is also involved
    with power transmission systems for which the
    technology they bought IS RELEVANT! BOY ARE YOU STUPID OR
    WHAT! GET REAL!

    A response to the above:

    stupidharry4 • May 3, 2000 7:06 PM Flag
    users disliked this posts

    LOL...the Basher's exposed...Gee Testes1961...did
    you forget to hit the correct alias or are you so in
    love in r2d2 you are copying his material?

    Come on Testes-r2d2-Howard Juno..you are a one man (boy)
    bandstand!!!! Give it up..or as the morons say...GET REAL!!! Less

    Reply to harry2big4u by testes1961 •May 3, 2000 6:39 PM
    r2d2_n_c3po • May 3, 2000 11:56 PM Remove

    GET REAL! LOL HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

    I made 2 posts with that alias. As I told the too dumb to comprehend English UILT, I made it obvious. I used Get Real frequently those days!

    So the real good laugh is how the UILT made a fool of himself, once again.... with my assistance of course! GET REAL! LOL! LOL! LOL!

  • Reply to

    I'm glad the UILT has finally come clean

    by r2d2_n_c3po Feb 4, 2015 8:14 AM
    r2d2_n_c3po r2d2_n_c3po Feb 5, 2015 12:13 PM Flag

    Actually a much quicker way to find those posts is to search on the phrase " I have this setup in a such a way" Please do and when you read those posts of mine back in that time frame you will see (as the UILT knows) I was quoting another UILT/"fool" type basher named johnginer19 (I think those were the numbers) who threatened me because I took him on just like I have the "fool", the DECEITFUL LYING TROLL, and many others. Most of them were paid bashers, the UILT is an exception IMO, he is simply a real (really real) LOSER! He lost his adz on SCON because of his own stupidity! YEP! They all ran away, when they realized I was too smart for them. The UILT is too dumb to come to that realization! LOL! LOL! LOL!

  • Reply to

    Who sold to Blackrock?

    by japankokura Feb 5, 2015 5:06 AM
    r2d2_n_c3po r2d2_n_c3po Feb 5, 2015 10:35 AM Flag

    There are two BLACK Rock entities. According to Yahoo, (you can see it right now)
    BlackRock Institutional Trust Company, owned . 712,477 shares as of Sep 30, 2014. The latest Form 13G shows 714628 shares, an increase of 2151 shares.

    I would also like to call your attention to the cover page of the filing where it states:

    "December 31, 2014
    (Date of Event Which Requires Filing of this Statement)"

    This appears simply to be a quarterly filing of their ownership which was necessitated by the acquisition of those additional shares. It is not an indication of a very recent large purchase.

    You can likely confirm that by looking up the SEC rule under which it was (again according to the cover page)
    "Check the appropriate box to designate the rule pursuant to
    which this Schedule is filed:
    [X] Rule 13d-1(b) "

    That Barclays holding is not accurate IMO. I don't believe you will ever see any filings by Barclays for SCON and with those number of shares they would have had to.

  • Reply to

    STI announces commercial production by 4th Q

    by mask_ipx_spx Jan 13, 2015 7:42 PM
    r2d2_n_c3po r2d2_n_c3po Feb 5, 2015 10:21 AM Flag

    Gee I don't see the word "promise" or anything that might be misconstrued to have any such meaning. I guess that's proof though that I am not a paid shill as you often claim. You will not find any post of mine confirming any such thing.

  • r2d2_n_c3po r2d2_n_c3po Feb 5, 2015 10:19 AM Flag

    Yep one can click on that post and you will not find IMO! But that's not the end of the story as the DECEITFUL LYING TROLL knows full well. Earlier I told the UILT to look at the timeline of the posts.
    Earlier on the 27th the DECEITFUL LYING TROLL made a claim (without and foundation or backup) that STI had not started ordering parts for a new production machine. The post he references (4:27PM) states that JQ indicated that they had started...in essence calling him a liar we all know him to be. So at 4:45PM the UILT provided his reason why he believed what he did. At 4:54 ( a post he purposely avoids) I responded that I agreed that the statement he referenced in his 4:45 post wasn't necessarily the proof, but that a later part of it did indicate that they had started to pre-order albeit on a small scale... and ended with my "IMO" which he now claims I never made. (And which, comicly he almost NEVER USES). And guess what he makes a post a few hours later (8:11) where he extracts from both of my earlier posts AND EVEN QUOTES THE "IMO" which he now claims I never made. Talk about someone being a stupid idiotic liar! This is why it is so much fun to rub his own cow dung back into his face! And why I'll always be pulling the strings of my little DUMMY puppet! LOL! LOL! LOL!

  • Reply to

    The crybaby INFANTILE UIT has gone into hiding

    by r2d2_n_c3po Feb 4, 2015 11:45 PM
    r2d2_n_c3po r2d2_n_c3po Feb 5, 2015 10:09 AM Flag

    This BRS lie has been totally disproven. Simply more UILT pre-pubescent adolescent behavior!

  • It is hard to imagine how this infantile crybaby can continue to receive the beating he gets on a daily basis. Is he a sadomasochist? He makes unimaginably stupid idiotic statements, misrepresents, lies and fabricates such outrageous garbage, all of which is almost immediately show to be false and misleading while he himself is shown to be a deceitful and a liar! I wonder why he expends so much energy. He must have spent hundreds of hours reviewing my past posts and for what????? NOTHING! NADA ZERO!

    Well you know what they say:" Stupid is stupid does!" and that describes the UILT to a "T"! LOL! LOL! LOL!

SCON
1.0922-0.0178(-1.60%)2:21 PMEDT