Because it's still a dollar higher than it will be come January 2014. Then they can add more to their accounts.
Can we agree JJ is uncomfortable ruling at this stage of the case. Can we also agree that the courtroom errors that occurred under his watch could have been cleared up with a juror by juror question session, with council from both sides on hand regarding their intent on verdict sheet.
This bizarre foul up is the very reason these other companies are now forcing JJ to make a decision. Once he's does it's on record that what a jury did and what he decides will most likely be grounds for the appeal overturning this case. Whether it happen or not is meaningless while adding another year or two to the timeframe is. JJ has backed himself straight into a corner and cannot speak, rule, add to or take away, anything the jury has previously decided without chance of mistrial. Google is using big industry names now in this brief to tell him...we're watching you, don't make a single mistake, you'll be sorry. JJ is clearly nervous and rightly so, Vringo's loss with a jury win will make a laughing stock out of him, but unfortunately it's his only chance now.!
You call $0.03 (+0.97%) VRNG good? You deserve to lose everything!
Funny the case law referenced in this matter is 100%oppisite of your analogy! Go figure, the system knows when a company is head hunting for $ vs a legit company that's bees damaged by infringers. No way JJ hands Vringo a win on this case.
Also check those on Free V boards who do patent law for a living. These suits are non material and will reap nothing substantial! Shorts win again.
that number again! Shorts have mounted the Longs!
Vringo the NPE! Watch what happens now as this gets delayed for at least a year! Shorts win yet again!
Lastly, Fan Loyalty is a platform that lets users interact, vote and communicate with contestants in reality TV series, as well as downloading and setting clips from such shows as video ringtones.
Has anyone, I mean anyone ever watched a live reality show and heard the host say check your "fan loyalty" message from your VRINGO service! Never! Only one way to talk to stars on TV....TWEET! Idiots.
They simply hold patents from various companies and charge a small fee and sit on them. Meanwhile investors find out about the exchanges weeks or even months later as their accounts turn a darker shade of RED!
Great business model!
Now think how about how big Jacksons paycheck could be with Google's worth of $450 BILLION!
and we now shed light on Vringos situation!
(Black News) Mark Ciavarella Jr, a 61-year old former judge in Pennsylvania, has been sentenced to nearly 30 years in prison for literally selling young juveniles for cash. He was convicted of accepting money in exchange for incarcerating thousands of adults and children into a prison facility owned by a developer who was paying him under the table. The kickbacks amounted to more than $1 million. The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has overturned some 4,000 convictions issued by him between 2003 and 2008, claiming he violated the constitutional rights of the juveniles – including the right to legal counsel and the right to intelligently enter a plea. Some of the juveniles he sentenced were as young as 10-years old. Ciavarella was convicted of 12 counts, including racketeering, money laundering, mail fraud and tax evasion. He was also ordered to repay $1.2 million in restitution. His “kids for cash” program has revealed that corruption is indeed within the prison system, mostly driven by the growth in private prisons seeking profits by any means necessary.
OH YES IT HAPPEN FOLKS! SHORTS WILL BE ADDING HERE!
IR did not put out a public notification but David Hoff has the entire scoop on what's happening at Vringo. Maybe IR is shut down internally, who knows anymore what's happening there.
destroy a company. It's becoming a factor as publishers of past articles and friends of Vringo management are selling and moving on. All the shorts need to do now is just sit back and let management run the company right into a brick wall. Their getting closer every day, very reckless and shady business practices !
Are you kidding me, Vringo had better not have partnered w/o notifying share holders this late after the deal. SEC to be notified if this was true! You don't wait two months after a deal to announce! entire PR is botched anyways.
Notice you see no Vringo vs Google et al! Great job JJ on your ORDER for parties to meet by Dec. 2nd!
12/02/13 10:00 am Mark Davis Norfolk 2:2012 cv 691 JTH Tax, Inc. vs Callahan Motion Hearing All
12/02/13 12:00 am Leonard Norfolk 2:2013 cr 132 USA vs Malone Plea Agreement Hearing Rasheen Malone
12/02/13 2:00 pm Douglas Miller Norfolk 2:2013 mj 459 USA vs Muse Detention Hearing Albertis Muse
12/02/13 2:00 pm Douglas Miller Norfolk 2:2013 mj 459 USA vs Moton Detention Hearing Yolanda Moton
12/02/13 2:00 pm Leonard Norfolk 2:2012 cv 691 JTH Tax, Inc. vs Callahan Settlement Conference All
12/02/13 2:00 pm Leonard Norfolk 2:2012 cv 691 JTH Tax, Inc. vs Callahan Status Conference All
12/02/13 2:00 pm Tommy Miller Newport News 4:2013 cr 106 USA vs Brown Arraignment Michael Brown
12/02/13 2:00 pm Tommy Miller Newport News 4:2013 cr 110 USA vs Brown Detention Hearing Kelvin Brown
12/02/13 2:00 pm Tommy Miller Newport News 4:2013 cr 67 USA vs Maylone Plea Agreement Hearing Freddie Maylone
12/02/13 2:00 pm Tommy Miller Newport News 4:2013 cr 67 USA vs Strowder Plea Agreement Hearing Leslie Strowder
12/02/13 2:00 pm Tommy Miller Newport News 4:1998 cr 79 USA vs McNeil DetentionPreliminaryHearing Brian McNeil
12/02/13 2:00 pm Tommy Miller Newport News 4:2013 cr 99 USA vs Medrano-Nunez Plea Agreement Hearing Noe Medrano-Nunez
12/02/13 2:30 pm Mark Davis Newport News 4:2013 cv 106 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA vs Greenhow Show Cause Hearing All
12/02/13 3:30 pm Mark Davis Norfolk 2:2013 cv 420 United States Of America vs Castillo Show Cause Hearing All
12/03/13 10:00 am Mark Davis Newport News 4:2013 cr 67 USA vs Maylone Jury Trial Freddie Maylone
12/03/13 10:00 am Mark Davis Newport News 4:2013 cr 67 USA vs Strowder Jury Trial Leslie Strowder
12/03/13 2:00 pm Leonard Newport News 4:2013 cr 68 USA vs Johnson Plea Agreement Hearing Joseph Johnson
12/04/13 9:00 am Leonard Norfolk 2:2010 cr 148 USA vs Chavious Arraignment Troy Chavious
12/04/13 9:00 am Leonard Norfolk 2:2013 cr 165 USA vs Lay Arraignment Stephen Lay
12/04/13 9:00 am Leonard Norfolk 2:2012 cr 189 USA vs Warrick Arraignment Marcus Warrick
12/04/13 9:00 am Leonard Norfolk 2:2000 cr 94 USA vs Brown Arraignment Tyrell Brown
12/04/13 9:30 am Allen Norfolk 2:2002 cr 225 USA vs Briggs Revocation Superv Rls Kenyatta Briggs
12/05/13 9:15 am Allen Norfolk 2:2013 cv 421 Sentara Healthcare vs Medical Mutual Insurance Company of North Carolina Scheduling Conference-Rule 16b All
12/05/13 9:30 am Tommy Miller Norfolk 2:2011 cv 529 Goodrich Corporation vs BaySys Technologies, LLC Show Cause Hearing All
Well, after reading a 65pg. appeals brief the most likely answer to your question is "nothing". Not sure why they needed to defend every aspect of the case from Markman construction to Damages over and over, but I get their point. They are trying to discredit any or all of the evidence during and after trial as useless. Sounded repetitive and full of subjective language, but interesting that they would try and test the judges memory regarding everything. It seems as though they are trying to cause a legal mistake to be obvious and actually discredit JJ ruling. 10 pgs. on Laches alone and how Vringo was warned the night before the ruling came down. I asked Cliff Weinstein personally about that ruling and he said we never knew it was coming, nor were we given a chance to defend the matter. JJ may be caught in a pickle on that, because Defendants said he told them both in person and present... I'll rule the next morning on "LACHES MATTER". Either Cliff lied to me or they're putting words in JJs mouth that he'll need to clarify. It's only a $450M mistake, c'mon. To this day Google has never admitted on record of infringing Vringo's patents hoping the prior art argument is valid . They told the courts in plain english, this case is ready for JMOL nothing less, and should be excused in it's entirety. So JJ has enough to rule very soon because they've made it clear no settlement can be reached by them. Anymore delays and this will sell off so fast most won't have a chance to get out.
In who's favor. Again we are at crossroads with JJ, can go either way!