How does the best legal team keep getting it wrong, haven't they been down this road before?
"Litigation took longer than many expected, the jury award and the laches ruling were not anything shareholders expected".
It also points to conspiracy and gamesmanship being perfectly displayed to Vringo's team. They were informed by the Judge their Laches were late to the party. No injunction because Vringo's not 100% sure Google infringed. This saves them latter if the appeals are won by Google. You have no evidence that seals any deal as of today. you have experts waiting in the scenes and Vringo praying G will offer something. They already told Vringo's legal team to their face, (F) ck off we will not settle with you. wait till the 22nd and settlement talks fall apart in a matter of minutes. At least it'll give Cliff a chance to post another PR of non-value and earn his stay!
Vringo's going down in patent case history as case law for what happens to NPEs! DEFEAT!
Vringo pulls off a miracle. It will not happen, and so many cases just like the one Vringo's involved in are the proof. The Courts are there to protect the rich not the right!
capt. do you know why I changed my attitude about Vringo. Non delivery of any such claim made by Vringo for over two years. They milked investors into a scam of high risk with perfectly worded PRs that have netted investors ZERO! This morning PR is a subtle way of saying we do not foresee any resolution to matters with Google for several months and up to years. Read between the lines that's what it takes to understand a poorly given PR from Vringo. It could save you thousands later, Shorts are in control and Vringo can't stop it!
We cannot guarantee anything beyond that.
This is nothing compared to what's coming vringone-ians!
That's the deal!
Truth hurts doesn't it! The muddy PRs just keep coming and look where the share price sits! Who's right here you or me bud!
Next comes the secondary as Vringo the NPE can't continue burning the cash from both ends w/o some plan. That plan is to dilute again and at what price? $2.25 - $2.50 if they're lucky! then capt. will see more red for months to come.
Our fragmented patent system sometimes gets things right and sometimes doesn't. And even when it gets things right, seldom will it achieve perfection. Law is more about reconciling competing interests than it is about dictating truth. But there is a vague consensus about what behavior should be encouraged in intellectual property.
"Laws of nature" cannot be patented, because this would create a monopoly and thereby discourage innovation.
To many smart people starting to realize that in today's growing tech world you cannot stifle with patents. The rich will make sure of that. Vringo will be a statistic and a term in used by many in "case law" soon of what not to do to BIG companies!
I beg to differ capt. You've been here off and on when events are coming up to try and make a few on DIPS! I however have dealt personally with the company for over two years and support my comments with facts. Who's made money the past two years LONGS or SHORTS, guess that shuts you up!
DOG in a glass house cause I see clearly son!
Not only do we refuse to settle nor have any offer to give but if we're successful in our appeals we want damages from VRINGO, GOT THAT YOU HONOR!
GOOD DAY SIR!
Smart decision and one many are starting to take notice of. I'm doing my part to make sure no one says. I wasn't warned of this. The company has no plans as I stated other than SUE FOR PROFITS! This mornings PR sealed that deal.
of terms involving the 420 and 664. Would a judge who sees clearly need experts to help in determining anything, NO! Don't expect Vringo to try and explain why this process is where it is today, it would scare off the few stragglers that sit around with a few thousand share away!
It's only fitting as everyone knows what to expect on Jan. 22nd. MORE DELAYS BY GOOGLE LEGAL TEAM.
It also validates JJ concerns with ruling on anything as Vringo's patens may very well be legit. But, does Google's system use a similar method but changes order to alleviate infringement? JJ must believe so as he's not yet convinced or has he rushed to rule on open motions