% | $
Quotes you view appear here for quick access.

Cisco Systems, Inc. Message Board

rationalthought11 14 posts  |  Last Activity: May 11, 2016 3:23 PM Member since: Jan 9, 2009
SortNewest  |  Oldest  |  Highest Rated Expand all messages
  • rationalthought11 by rationalthought11 May 11, 2016 3:23 PM Flag

    No discussion of clinical hold or stays of Direct trial. Going concern warning. and the sudden appreanace of environmental costs that could turn as high as 32mm. Huh? That transaction really stinks.It seems unusual at the tim eNWBO wasted precious money to buy it. Not it appears that a related party seller unloaded a brownfield site to NWBO shareholders. truly horrifying

  • rationalthought11 rationalthought11 Mar 11, 2016 2:18 PM Flag

    This has been going on for about 10 years. The guy is mentally ill. Unfortunately he still gets to vote.

  • rationalthought11 rationalthought11 Mar 9, 2016 3:33 PM Flag


  • rationalthought11 rationalthought11 Mar 8, 2016 7:27 PM Flag

    The "brain shortage" won't be fixed (in the intermediate term) by domestic kids filling the jobs. The US is, however, a nice place live so educated Asians and Indians will continue to fill the jobs at Intel, Microsoft and hundred other high tech companies.

    If you wan to be frightened and ashamed just look at the graduate students graduating from Stanford MIT duke Caltech etc. Most Americans couldn't even spell their names much less compete with them academically.

  • Reply to

    Doc Logic, Bohsie, Larry Smith

    by chessnotcheckersed Mar 7, 2016 8:58 PM
    rationalthought11 rationalthought11 Mar 8, 2016 6:06 PM Flag

    You keep forgetting the T variable. With the passage of time fundamentals actually change. when you don't here news that is expected within a reasonable window of when it was expected that is a fundamental change. When the FDA imposes a hot that is a fundamental change etc.

  • rationalthought11 by rationalthought11 Mar 8, 2016 5:45 PM Flag

    Obama is the worst president ever because.........
    and here is what I would do to fix it.

    OK teapiga if you don't have "small hands" have ago at it. Im guessing you chaikkenschist won't do it cuz
    a) you be ignant
    b) you're all qunts when it come down to it

  • rationalthought11 rationalthought11 Mar 5, 2016 5:11 PM Flag

    Take the quiz evangelicals and teapigs. let me know how you did

  • Reply to

    Former U.S. Ambassador To The United Nations

    by sdmiller4747 Mar 4, 2016 5:13 PM
    rationalthought11 rationalthought11 Mar 4, 2016 5:39 PM Flag

    He should be in jail for a lot more. Got off a perjury charge with an "I forgot about that"
    War criminal.

    perjured himself on the "Yellowcake that helped lie the US into the slaughter in Iraq.

    True Human filth uck up kick down POschist

  • Reply to


    by hopefloats_go_nwbo Mar 2, 2016 9:56 PM
    rationalthought11 rationalthought11 Mar 4, 2016 9:49 AM Flag

    You're not trapped, You've just lost money on a bad decision. Very different concepts. Read up on the term "sunk cost" you might learn something. The ONLY relevant factors are those in front of you, what has happened in the past is irrelevant. I suggest you look at ONCY oh wait ONCYF. After their panc trial cratered (like I predicted with compelling evidence which the cheerleaders ignored) the stock went to about 3 bucks . I told them gain you still have time to save some of your money (most if not all ignored the advice,) the stock now trade on the bulletin board at 27 cents. You are only trapped by your lack of intelligence, which I cannot help you with.

  • Reply to


    by drummword Mar 2, 2016 9:17 AM
    rationalthought11 rationalthought11 Mar 4, 2016 9:16 AM Flag

    I'll mention it to you once more. The reporting of material events is contingent upon
    a) understanding the facts completely enough to issue an accurate statement. Analyzing dat takes time this gives them a very good defense and
    b) There si NO statutory time limit in which "other" material events must be reported. NONE. So the failure to report for instance a bad interim analysis is not subject to ANY hard and fast disclosure time frame. You are making a fool's mistake if your "analysis" includes the failure to report bad news as an element of your decision making process.

  • rationalthought11 rationalthought11 Mar 4, 2016 9:07 AM Flag

    a) There will be no fast track designation, Patently absurd if you knew anything about clinical trials. As is the notion that they will just be able to expand the N in this trial. Any identified subgroup would have to start from scratch.
    b) The reporting certain "other" material events is NOT subject to any mandatory reporting date, A bad interim would fall under the "other category" If you are hanging your hat on silence establishing that there is "no materially bad news" you are simply foolish.
    c) Linda will never be gone she controls a majority of the stock. Do you know anything abut NWBO at all?at all?

    Pay attention!

  • Reply to

    Did you see this coming?

    by rationalthought11 Feb 29, 2016 1:40 PM
    rationalthought11 rationalthought11 Mar 1, 2016 3:57 PM Flag

    rationalthought11 • Nov 20, 2014 5:37 PM Remove Reply
    Anyone bother to read the 10-q More dilution just around the corner. You been warned. You're welcome

    New Topic
    rationalthought11 • Jul 12, 2011 2:18 AM funding no longer the problem-dilution

    rationalthought11 • Aug 11, 2012 1:57
    unless they get the underwriting completed they won't finish the trial. In addition, more dilution is coming

    0users liked this postsusers disliked this posts2Reply
    science good - finance bad
    by rationalthought11 • Aug 15, 2013 12:25 AM Remove
    The issue with many junior biotech stocks ins't the science - it's finance. The two aren't unrelated. Financing often follows promising science.. That said, I believe in this case the science is promising but they can't seem to get ahead of the financing curve. Stock valuation is all fantasy. Even good interim results won't solve the dilution issue. Sad.


  • rationalthought11 rationalthought11 Feb 29, 2016 2:00 PM Flag

    YOU don't know #$%$. a) Presidents don't make laws. b) presidents don't have any authority to make states change their laws. There has never been a federal libel law. No one in Congress has ever said a word about libel laws so there is ZERO interest in it.

    And how will they be "opened up"? Media corporations can already be sued for libel. Trump is a litigious fool with no understanding of the law (except of course bankruptcy). If someone posts demonstrably false FACTS that cause him damage, Trump can sue. And no law restricting opinion will ever get past the Supreme Court even if it is filled with fascists like Scalia Rehnquist and Roberts.

  • rationalthought11 by rationalthought11 Feb 29, 2016 1:40 PM Flag

    I done told ya so a long time ago that you needed to figure in additional dilution for your pie in the sky fantasies.

28.99+0.09(+0.31%)9:54 AMEDT