If Varli does what they think it will do, that is improves the performance of BMY's PD1, and others as well, you will see a bidding war for this company. Or you will see everyone lining up to pair up with Celldex's Varli. Market knows this, and that is why institutional ownership remains high. IMO
Well done Facts2jack. Now look for lots of thumbs down and little substantive rebuttal to your clear thinking. Other countries have attempted to play nice with Iran, but they always knew the US would keep Iran in check, but that is not the case anymore. World leaders have got to be losing confidence in our leadership today.
Those that disagree with my statement on Israel, and have used a thumbs down, at least have the guts to let us know who you are.
Be proud of your radical views you leftist punks.
"apartheid" ? You have got to be kidding. How far left are you? They are the most inclusive country in that entire region. And they would have never build that wall if the terrorist had not constantly exploded bombs in their streets, busses, and cafes. Or have you forgotten the carnage that Israel has had to tolerate because of people like you suggesting they have no right to protect their own people from slaughter? When those that are committing murder stop murdering, the people of Israel will be even more inclusive, as they actually wish to be, and have attempted to be in the past.
You are an ignorant piece of work rulebreaker.
Late Friday, Obama extended the deadline for Iran to comply on the nuclear issue. But the sanctions were lifted by Obama prior to the talks. No pressure to comply? This reset button won't work either.
Get ready for a fully nuclear Iran.
"For at least one hundred years, the Dept of the Treasury (of which the IRS is a bureau) has been positioned and utilized by nearly every administration and our security apparatus (as dictated by perceived necessity and circumstances"
Does that also include the attempted intimidation and silencing of the ruling party's political opposition?
" It has been regularly used against bootleggers (for tax evasion), against fringe groups claiming charitable tax status, against nationalistic groups (aiming to support their home countries from which they emigrated), against common citizens (by supporters and proponents of the McCarthy efforts at witch hunting), against minority groups/individuals (advocating for equal rights or civil rights), and to "check" on any individual for almost any reason that any administration has had an interest in."
Well now, that sounds like "my party is in power now, so #$%$". I am trying to figure out where you think the Tea Party or Conservatives fit into your montage of precedents/excuses for violating the rights of your fellow Americans. Would that be "fringe groups", or "nationalistic groups"? Or just a general national security, or national party concern?
You sir, with the way you think, are a danger to your country. But that is just my opinion, and does not give me, or others the right to use the IRS to stop or silence your political, and charitable activities as a free, upstanding, law abiding American.
The two subjects are not disparate at all, in terms of both are in desperate need of an actual investigation. Not the kind of investigation where we rely on a justice department that only investigates and prosecutes matters which advance only their fundamental changing of our country.
I have one question for you. To date, do you see anything that this Administration has done to date that warrants any further potential investigation? I could provide you the list, but I think you likely know the list too.
Leftist should see it as well, they may be surprised how honest it is. As it gives the lefts thinking in great detail.
""It is highly unusual for the Justice Department to issue subpoenas to members of Congress or their aides, given sensitivities and legal barriers connected with the separation of powers between the executive and legislative branches of government. These subpoenas are the first formal requests for information to Congress involving a federal insider-trading investigation in nearly a decade.
Insider-trading investigations involving information that originates from within the government are different from traditional insider cases. Under securities rules, company executives are prohibited from discussing nonpublic, market-moving information about the company with individual investors.
Until recently, it had been unclear how such restrictions applied to government officials. But a 2012 congressional stock-trading law stipulated that public officials have a legal duty to keep confidential any nonpublic information about government actions that could affect stock prices. The SEC and Justice Department have yet to bring a case under the new law.""
Give it to a special prosecutor, so that we can remove the potential for politics. At the same time, do the same with the IRS targeting scandal. That would be fair. Don't you think?
This business of passing law that the general public must abide, yet others in DC do not have to abide, must end.
Would not such tiered law making violate the equal protection clause in some way? We see this same kind of exemption in the new healthcare law or at least in the execution of that law. I'm sure there are other examples. It is all intolerable, and if properly challenged, likely unconstitutional. It is well past time to do away with the oligarchy.
Means nothing. Except they have not covered, and want more time to do so.
The point is, they like their agreement with BMY, and have no intention to give up control to anyone. Yes, golden goose.
Well Rulebreaker, it would seem that longsvrts credibility remains intact. And your attack was just a little out of line. So now you have seen a news release to the public.
You may have noticed, longvrts did not give an exact date of the cc, only an approximation.
BS bingo, It is simply a mid year update in an otherwise slow summer season. It is what investors want and deserve, and it is respectful of management to provide the update to investors. You will likely hear that every thing is going just as planned, and that all the negative BS is just that, BS. By the way, they intend to keep Varli inhouse, as they believe they have a very valuable asset in Varli. Look for possible new pairings for varli, if it make sense for Celldex and investors. And why would it not?
You don't call out anyone. We call you out. Who the hhell are you anyway? Wait, we don't care. Better yet, what was your handle prior to today? Wait, we still don't care.
MBB, How you doing sweetheart? Apparently you can't stand me ignoring you, as you have not stopped running your mouth to me ever since I put you on ignore. I liked the old ignore format better. I may have to go back and read your past months of rambling. Wait, what am I saying??? Scratch that.
Now, about Celldex. It is not fun to watch a company I believe in, and invested in, test a 52 week low 2x in a couple months, especially after so much good news. (won't bore you with the details), you know them. That said, I am just fine, especially after a good conversation with IR.
She certainly was not processing what he was saying. You have to wonder why her staff didn't pull the plug on the interview at the moment it went south. And who books a live interview with out at least a basic vetting of the "expert"? They must be hiring amateurs for that show.
US President puts new sanctions on Russia, and rumors of a lockdown at the WH, floated by some on CNBC. What a gift of a week for shorts.
Point taken, but not sure you can say Varli has no substance. The young lady, with a complete response for more that a year, would disagree.