Tue, Nov 25, 2014, 7:33 PM EST - U.S. Markets closed


% | $
Quotes you view appear here for quick access.

Cubic Corporation Message Board

realinvestmentstrategies 142 posts  |  Last Activity: 21 hours ago Member since: Feb 27, 2002
SortNewest  |  Oldest  |  Highest Rated Expand all messages
  • realinvestmentstrategies realinvestmentstrategies 21 hours ago Flag

    Personally, I'd rather have a meeting with Keith to see what's going on. If authorized, I will go, maybe one or two others would like to accompany me.

  • Reply to

    Just a Comment

    by pocilujko Nov 24, 2014 5:52 PM
    realinvestmentstrategies realinvestmentstrategies 23 hours ago Flag

    I wouldn't rule out that it is happening now, as the departure of Mark is notable. Then we can get a devil we don't know, as opposed to the devil we do know.

  • Reply to

    Just a Comment

    by pocilujko Nov 24, 2014 5:52 PM
    realinvestmentstrategies realinvestmentstrategies Nov 24, 2014 6:39 PM Flag

    Good point.

    However it might make sense to have a COO willing to spend lots of time in South Texas since that's where the company's future is.

  • realinvestmentstrategies by realinvestmentstrategies Nov 24, 2014 9:39 AM Flag

    Imperial Capital rates Earthstone at Outperform...

  • realinvestmentstrategies by realinvestmentstrategies Nov 23, 2014 8:18 PM Flag

    On May 27, 2014, USEG sold Williston Basin oil properties for $11.5 million. When acquired, the company paid $1.4 million for the property which included .22 producing net wells. While the total cost of selling .62 wells was not disclosed, it might be assumed the additional investment of .4 wells was about $4 million, making it a total investment of $5.4 million and a $6.1 million gain. The PV-10 on this property was disclosed as $8.7 million.

    While it appears to be about a $6 million gain, the sales proceeds were recorded as a credit to the full cost pool, thus nothing to the income statement.

  • realinvestmentstrategies by realinvestmentstrategies Nov 23, 2014 7:57 PM Flag

    On May 7, 2014, USEG paid $3.9 million to acquire a net interest in 3,384 acres in Dimmit County Texas. So far, the S. McNight 1305H and Berry 1H have both released results which appear to be total duds. The working interest in these properties was 33.3% and net revenue interest was 22.5%.

    The company, according to its last 10Q spent a total in this acreage and wells through Sept. 30 2014 of $7.8 million. According to the latest press release, a third well, the S. McKnight 1317HB was spud on Sept 28, and is going into the Eagle Ford formation.

    While this project still has potential, it could end up as a big loss. On the other hand, if the Eagle Ford well is successful, there are many more wells that could be developed, not to mention the potential for Austin Chalk potentials.

  • realinvestmentstrategies by realinvestmentstrategies Nov 23, 2014 7:26 PM Flag

    It’s on the books for a little over $21 million. The company also spends at least $3 million annually to maintain it. Plus probably some extra for admin on this asset.

    If this project fizzles totally, the company might have to reverse its asset and create a liability.

    On the other hand, according to USEG’s previous 10K’s, an agreement was made on Aug 19, 2008 with Thompson Creeks Metals Company giving them the ability to acquire a 75% interest in the mine for $400 million. While the deal expired during the financial collapse, this obviously shows the mine had some value.

    You tell me what this mine is worth today, or not worth today.

  • realinvestmentstrategies by realinvestmentstrategies Nov 23, 2014 6:47 PM Flag

    It is intended to present a fair financial position of a company. It works well for simple businesses. Say you have a retail business unit that rents all its store locations and turns its inventory over every few days. It becomes quite easy to allocate gross margin against fixed costs and overhead and know the profit. But even these businesses can get complicated when they start demanding rebates from suppliers based on volume.

    Then you have a business like General Motors which was obligated with life time health care benefits as a retirement benefit. At first it was considered only a benefit from contract to contract, but eventually considered permanent. Later on there were issues of life expectancy, assumptions of the rate of inflation on healthcare, and when General Motors went down, they had to acknowledge over $100 billion of costs that were catch up accounting. The point is that GAAP accounting was wrong for decades at GM, but much of it was noted in the footnotes of GM's 10K reports.

    In the business of oil exploration and development, there are also accounting issues that are disconnected from quarterly or yearly income statements. It may take years to develop a property like Booth Tortuga, or for that matter, even a moly mine. As a result, it might be more beneficial to do a detail analysis of properties vs the balance sheet, as opposed to looking at a short term income statement. The PV-10 is a great piece of off balance sheet analysis, but even that data has to be tested with its assumptions.

    In particular, if a management makes continual improvements to its property portfolio, it is doing a good job. If it just milks revenue off existing known properties, then there hasn’t been any improvement.

  • Reply to

    So I admit I don't understand this....

    by ytsejam25 Nov 18, 2014 12:37 PM
    realinvestmentstrategies realinvestmentstrategies Nov 23, 2014 10:05 AM Flag

    The solicitations to join in on the lawsuit ends Dec. 2. I suspect they are having trouble finding clients. The announcements are likely nothing more than paid Yahoo advertising, it certainly isn't news.

    If you followed the situation, PCRX got a warning letter from the FDA. After advertising Exparel as a 72 hour pain block, the FDA reminded PCRX that its approval was only as a 24 hour pain block. PCRX was ordered to change its literature, however there was no fine. PCRX has plenty of clinical data showing Exparel works as a 72 hour pain block, the issue was its FDA approval was based on the 24 time frame.

    The stock fell back about 10% on the news, but only after this incredible two year run up from the mid $20's to over $100 per share. So ask yourself about this class action lawsuit, who was damaged?

  • Reply to

    I also added a few

    by donnieappleseed Nov 20, 2014 3:13 PM
    realinvestmentstrategies realinvestmentstrategies Nov 22, 2014 2:56 PM Flag

    This is the kind of dialogue that IMO is beneficial to interested parties.

    The share price is a disaster. However the sector has also been hammered. Also the short interest is up a bit in the last reporting period, and according to Reg Sho there was high short selling between the last week in October and first week of November.

    With the family management issue, it will be interesting to see what kind of person replaces Mark Larsen as COO. In addition, I'm interested to see if the new COO operates out of Riverton WY, or South Texas.

  • Reply to

    I also added a few

    by donnieappleseed Nov 20, 2014 3:13 PM
    realinvestmentstrategies realinvestmentstrategies Nov 22, 2014 9:49 AM Flag


    USEG stock seems to lost a higher percentage of its value than most companies in the sector. I suspect the uncertainty of the moly mine and possibly the family management structure have contributed to this. But if that’s why the share price is undervalued, just imagine the upside potential if these problems get fixed.

  • Reply to

    I also added a few

    by donnieappleseed Nov 20, 2014 3:13 PM
    realinvestmentstrategies realinvestmentstrategies Nov 22, 2014 9:43 AM Flag

    Donnie ,I’m not sure why there is so much sensitivity in talking about some of the USEG baggage. It seems there are a number of long term shareholders who find it necessary to chide anyone that posts something they perceive as negative. Believe me, you aren’t the only one who’s gotten that reception. Personally, I encourage open debate about the good and the bad, it leads to better understanding, IMO.

    I believe I was the one who first referred you to USEG and I’m sorry if you got caught with some shares in the three or four dollar range. Back when oil was over $100 I felt USEG shares were worth $8-10 and potentially higher if a couple issues would have been favorably addressed. Assuming oil stays permanently where it is now, that brings my opinion of a fair share price more to $5-6. I never imagined oil would go down 30% so quick.

    My primary method of valuing oil drilling & exploration stocks is to look at the market value of their assets. The idea being to assume if they liquidated all properties, what would be the cash value per share returned to the stock holder? USEG stock now trades at about half the value of its book value. In addition, last year’s PV-10 was $115 million for its proved oil properties, properties that showed book value of only $79 million. Because of the huge premium over book value, I see little risk of any impairment to USEG’s oil properties during this year end.

    In addition, the Booth Tortuga lease appears to have much more oil on it than has currently been proved. The Austin Chalk and Eagle Ford formations also might have millions of barrels available on the same lease, simply by drilling to different depths than the Buda. If that isn’t enough benefit, we’re finding that oil prices in this section of Texas get about $15 more per barrel than up in the Bakken due to better weather and few takeaway constraints.

    The company is not levered with debt like many of the other small oil companies. Yet during the last four months, USE

  • Reply to

    Reserve Writedowns Coming too

    by true_truth Nov 19, 2014 8:15 PM
    realinvestmentstrategies realinvestmentstrategies Nov 22, 2014 7:55 AM Flag

    If you're contending that reserves will go back on the books after prices rise, that's not correct. Once a property is impaired, it stays at that book value until sold.

  • realinvestmentstrategies realinvestmentstrategies Nov 19, 2014 7:07 PM Flag

    While I respect the rights of posters with an opinion, we all know anyone who could project a share price like Westcost claims would very soon be a billionaire. He is nothing more than a false profit that got lucky once.

  • Reply to

    Last COO share position

    by dibigkahuna Nov 19, 2014 5:08 PM
    realinvestmentstrategies realinvestmentstrategies Nov 19, 2014 7:03 PM Flag

    Basically you're confirming there is no evidence that Mark Larsen has recently sold any shares?

    Despite that he might have an incentive to do so.

  • Reply to

    The mine is holding me back.

    by keltus1952 Nov 18, 2014 2:10 PM
    realinvestmentstrategies realinvestmentstrategies Nov 18, 2014 7:09 PM Flag

    ED, you have this habit of chiding people when they post something other than production stats, especially if it is a complaint.

    Maybe Kel doesn't want to sell his shares at one third of what it ought to be worth. Can't he discuss this with someone without you trying to shut the conversation down?

  • Reply to

    Is USEG about to go banrkupt?

    by realinvestmentstrategies Nov 17, 2014 4:42 PM
    realinvestmentstrategies realinvestmentstrategies Nov 18, 2014 5:36 AM Flag

    They also have the $3 million annual nut from the moly mine. Plus the $6-7 million to employ 15 staff people.

  • realinvestmentstrategies by realinvestmentstrategies Nov 17, 2014 4:42 PM Flag

    The share price suggests it.

    Thinking outside the box while in Brazil...LOL.

  • Reply to

    Going to pick up a truck this weekend

    by booleansearcher Nov 14, 2014 9:18 PM
    realinvestmentstrategies realinvestmentstrategies Nov 17, 2014 2:55 PM Flag

    Wait for the de-listing, then you can get some shares at a bigger discount.

  • Reply to

    Q3 cc

    by loftusspc Nov 12, 2014 12:18 PM
    realinvestmentstrategies realinvestmentstrategies Nov 17, 2014 2:27 PM Flag

    With a share price under $2, the stock is acting like it's a bankruptcy candidate. Maybe Keith should explain how the company will survive $50 oil with few new drilling projects.

47.07+0.56(+1.20%)Nov 25 4:01 PMEST

Trending Tickers

Trending Tickers features significant U.S. stocks showing the most dramatic increase in user interest in Yahoo Finance in the previous hour over historic norms. The list is limited to those equities which trade at least 100,000 shares on an average day and have a market cap of more than $300 million.
Infoblox Inc.
NYSETue, Nov 25, 2014 4:01 PM EST
Helmerich & Payne, Inc.
NYSETue, Nov 25, 2014 4:05 PM EST
Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
NYSETue, Nov 25, 2014 4:04 PM EST