Sat, Dec 20, 2014, 6:18 PM EST - U.S. Markets closed

Recent

% | $
Quotes you view appear here for quick access.

Cubic Corporation Message Board

realinvestmentstrategies 137 posts  |  Last Activity: Dec 19, 2014 5:11 PM Member since: Feb 27, 2002
  • Reply to

    Support $3 now, otherwise under $2

    by westcost2015 Oct 1, 2014 10:19 AM
    realinvestmentstrategies realinvestmentstrategies Oct 1, 2014 11:45 AM Flag

    I've never been into chart analysis, but after an insider bought shares a few weeks ago, plus in the last six weeks the analyst increased his earnings forecast two different times covering his estimate for the next two quarters, I'm scratching my head wondering what the problem is.

    If there's any fundamental issue, it hasn't been disclosed yet other than maybe lower oil price concerns.

  • realinvestmentstrategies by realinvestmentstrategies Sep 30, 2014 11:04 AM Flag

    Q3 & Q4 both increased from 4 cents to 5 cents eps for both quarters.

    But the full year estimate for 2015 is revised downward from 30 cents to 23 cents. Per Yahoo.

  • realinvestmentstrategies realinvestmentstrategies Sep 29, 2014 10:47 PM Flag

    If the company decided to abandon the moly mine, it might also be able to close the water treatment plant. So don't assume the obligation is permanent. However, your point is well taken that the liability could be large.

    I countered offgrid on this, not that I can assume he is wrong. He might be right. But my point is that the company has not impaired the asset or recorded any liability. For those who blame Keith for everything, remember that independent accountants also approved this analysis for the last year end.

  • Reply to

    Management???

    by ytsejam25 Sep 28, 2014 6:21 PM
    realinvestmentstrategies realinvestmentstrategies Sep 29, 2014 11:14 AM Flag

    I wouldn't worry much about the FDA warning by itself. Paciria needs to change its advertising claims to be consistent with the FDA approval of 24 hour pain relief, not 72 hours. I don't believe there is any fine associated with the warning.

    What isn't known is if the advertising change would have any impact on Exparel's future growth, probably not but who knows.

    As for the leaches, I mean lawyers, they are only doing investigation for class action, I don't believe any lawsuit has been filed, and with the minor decline in share price so far, I expect any legal activity to be abandoned.

  • realinvestmentstrategies realinvestmentstrategies Sep 29, 2014 8:38 AM Flag

    The company currently represents the moly mine on the balance sheet as a mineral property asset valued at $22,000,000. In addition, the company has been spending about $2.8 million annually for the water treatment and mineral holding issues, not to mention the extra administrative overhead going on to manage the mine.

    If what you say is true, that the moly mine will bring in only $15-30 million from royalties over a several year period, then that property needs to be impaired.

    In addition, the company probably needs a separate charge creating a liability for the annual operating costs that won’t ever be recovered in a form of revenue.

  • realinvestmentstrategies realinvestmentstrategies Sep 28, 2014 8:30 PM Flag

    It’s pretty difficult to understand how a stock like USEG could fall so much below the fair value of its assets.

    Even the moly mine you mention has some value, and although I don’t expect it resolved near term like you imply should happen, it seems the company is working on a solution. I’m guessing it gets monetized
    in two to four years.

    There’s no cash flow problem at USEG. Likewise the market, while disliking oil companies is not in any panic like it was in 2008. All I can imagine is that USEG is misunderstood. It has the oil business and it has the moly mine which you dislike. The moly mine reduces EPS by 12 cent per year. So let’s say we got rid of the moly mine (but for $100 million), then after that $78 million profit, we are left with a profitable oil business.

    The biggest money making period of my investing career occurred during the financial collapse when companies went far below their basic rational value. Eventually reality set back in and some of these companies rebounded three to four fold. I plan to hang around and wait for fair value USEG.

  • Reply to

    Contango Buda update early next week

    by riskrewarddd Sep 26, 2014 3:22 PM
    realinvestmentstrategies realinvestmentstrategies Sep 27, 2014 7:11 PM Flag

    If what you've heard about the second drilling rig is true, that is huge. They could bring six new wells, or more, online per quarter at that rate.

  • Reply to

    Pure Trash ....

    by buystockbuystock Sep 26, 2014 10:50 AM
    realinvestmentstrategies realinvestmentstrategies Sep 26, 2014 12:42 PM Flag

    There’s been lots of criticism of Keith lately, and while I personally don’t know much about him just look at some of the recent moves by the company.

    -Lined up the Buda deal with Contango/Crimson
    -Made a new deal with a mystery partner
    -Sold some Bakken properties for a great price, netting $11.5 million
    -Made the deal on the uranium mine that could be worth $5-10 million
    -Seem to be making proactive moves on the moly mine.

    True, the share price has been a disappointment and more recently a disaster, yet it seems all the right moves are being made to get better shareholder value. So if it isn’t Keith doing this, who gets the credit?

  • Reply to

    Current Share Price

    by offgridblogger Sep 26, 2014 8:45 AM
    realinvestmentstrategies realinvestmentstrategies Sep 26, 2014 10:19 AM Flag

    My basis for investing is to consider undervalued firms on a fundamental basis. In the case of small oil companies, it seems like their asset value is the best measure of worth because it is a predictor of what the future earnings and revenue stream will be, at least that is my opinion.

    So on a conservative basis, let’s say the Anfield deal is worth $5 million (discounted for risk and time), let’s say they get rid of the moly mine for $22 million (book value) and let’s say the new PV-10 is $150 million (book value $86 million) and let’s say the other assets and liabilities are a wash that cancel each other out.

    Add the $5 million, $22 million and $150 million, you get a theoretical market cap of $177 million which ends up at about $6.30 per share.

    The wild cards are the moly mine and the real value of the South Texas wells, both which could be worth considerably more than my assumptions.

  • Reply to

    Jerry Danni and micro analysis

    by booleansearcher Sep 25, 2014 8:01 AM
    realinvestmentstrategies realinvestmentstrategies Sep 26, 2014 9:40 AM Flag

    While some data is more meaningful than others to the bottom line, I like seeing it.

    The Bakken stuff they post still shows a story. Like you can see 3 year old wells with cumulative production over 150,000 still pumping away steadily at about 100 boe/day. Some of those wells might go on for another 10-20 years.

  • Reply to

    Jerry Danni and micro analysis

    by booleansearcher Sep 25, 2014 8:01 AM
    realinvestmentstrategies realinvestmentstrategies Sep 25, 2014 4:38 PM Flag

    The stuff you call micro analysis allows us to forecast production over the next few quarters. While USEG's last quarter came in at 1280 boe/day, the next quarter is likely to have an average in the 1500 to 1600 boe/day.

    If you've been doing any recent micro analysis of Earthstone, you would know they are in danger of reporting up to a 20% decline in production for the quarter ending Sept 30, 2014 vs the last one that ended June 30, 2014.

  • Reply to

    Fear and anxiety here but WAIT THERE IS HOPE

    by booleansearcher Sep 20, 2014 10:19 AM
    realinvestmentstrategies realinvestmentstrategies Sep 23, 2014 11:31 PM Flag

    Will you be funding it with a quick profit from the $25K you claimed to invest in LEI at 51 cents per share, or did you ride that one up and back down?

  • Reply to

    Pretty obvious that management

    by bcfbubba Sep 23, 2014 11:55 AM
    realinvestmentstrategies realinvestmentstrategies Sep 23, 2014 4:16 PM Flag

    I'm wondering if that COO will be operating out of Riverton, WY, not exactly a location that attracts the headquarters of publicly traded companies.

    IMO, we are not yet done with the management shakeup. Lots of good things have happened in the last few months, maybe a few more to come.

  • Reply to

    Latest HVI Blog..

    by richardclovis Sep 22, 2014 1:11 PM
    realinvestmentstrategies realinvestmentstrategies Sep 22, 2014 1:19 PM Flag

    ----Deep digging in its data-base---

    Hmm, I wonder if that statement was intended to acknowledge anyone in particular?

  • realinvestmentstrategies realinvestmentstrategies Sep 22, 2014 11:34 AM Flag

    What kind of sales would you expect for the next couple of quarters?

  • Reply to

    Banks Field

    by richardclovis Sep 21, 2014 3:00 PM
    realinvestmentstrategies realinvestmentstrategies Sep 21, 2014 8:34 PM Flag

    I've also noticed the trend over the last few months. In fact capital expenditures were backed down in the quarter ending Dec. 31, 2013 and so far haven't rebounded. Also noticeable in the July figures you posted, the average well produced only 17 days, 940 production days/55 wells. That's less than normal.

    While it shows how vulnerable a small oil company is to the operator, your comment about---saved by Oak Valley is valid. I suspect with all the cash and bigger size of the merged company, they have numerous options to deploy that cash. That means they are not dependent on Statoil for their livelihood.

  • Reply to

    TRRC Reported Production 2014

    by richardclovis Sep 19, 2014 12:25 PM
    realinvestmentstrategies realinvestmentstrategies Sep 21, 2014 7:24 PM Flag

    While I don't personally know if there is a qualified family member waiting to take the position, I have confidence that there is an independent BOD that will do the right thing.

    With all the changes since last spring, the company seems to be trying to bring some shareholder value....More good Buda acreage with a mystery partner, sale of Bakken property at a profit, heated negotiations regarding moly mine, new cash potential out of written off uranium mine, now the resignation of Mark....it's been wild.

    Quite frankly, I am shocked that the share price hasn't reflected the good moves. Likewise, I wouldn't be surprised if a few more major changes are announced within the next 12 months.

CUB
52.75-0.53(-0.99%)Dec 19 4:05 PMEST

Trending Tickers

i
Trending Tickers features significant U.S. stocks showing the most dramatic increase in user interest in Yahoo Finance in the previous hour over historic norms. The list is limited to those equities which trade at least 100,000 shares on an average day and have a market cap of more than $300 million.