We know you are hunched over your dual monitors eagerly waiting the RCPI message response light to Flash red.
FLASH - FLASH - FLASH
Does that make you feel better?
I see it only took you 9 minutes to response.
Interesting how you and all other ID's monitor this stock 24/7
in a stock you say you don't own.
Like I said, last quarter you wanted to argue that Q1 data was bad but now you want to argue something else assuming the Nasdaq data is accurate. - A TEQUILLA SHOT FOR EVERYONE !
Feel free to contact Nasdaq and set them straight on their good or bad data.
If you want to argue that 4Q15 (12/31/2014) data is also bad, then feel free to do that also because Nasdaq data clearly shows institutional ownership has been rising this year.
Twicey has now been forced to accept the current Nasdaq Institutional Ownership data is correct which shows 10.71% as of the end of Q2 (6/30/2015). Twicey has posted numerous times that Nasdaq’s Q1 data MUST be wrong because in his view some data was not reverse split adjusted (despite Nasdaq was showing reverse split adjusted share counts) , blaa, blaa, blaa, but now Twicey wants to spin a new story line by assuming 1Q was correct. Simply too funny, but here are the facts, Institutional Ownership has risen significantly this year and Twicey and crew does not like it.
Twicey has also now been forced to admit that the New CFO (like the old CFO) is just part time which makes sense because a full time CFO is not needed until after the clinical trials move a little further.
Because Goldman Capital SOLD OUT
which means the Institutional Ownership data Nasdaq is showing TODAY (10.71%) as of the end of 2Q (6/30/2015) is not being impacted by any Goldman Capital data.
If you have a problem with Nasdaq Institutional Ownership HISTORICAL data, go cry to Nasdaq because it’s IRRELEVANT to what the Institutional ownership data is TODAY.
Twicey spent all weekend trying to spin the Nasdaq data in an attempt
to hide the fact that Institutional Ownership is rising this year.
Now Twicey is trying to spin the fact that RCPI has hired a part time CFO
who in the past has worked for a company that specializes in this.
Google - Tatum CFO Partners
Until RCPI gets thru the clinical trial process, they don't need a full time CFO.
Save money, and put it where it most makes sense.
Clinical Trails and Research.
Hold a special ed class for Twicey.
Twicey has spent all weekend with a stock he does not own, trying to spin and rationalize the Goldman Capital data over at Nasdaq.
As you know ociferdibble, the Goldman Capital data is now IRRELVANT as related to Institutional ownership because Goldman Capital SOLD OUT. That means they own zero shares and are not part of the Institutional ownership calculation for RCPI.
This therefore means the 10.71% Institutional Ownership that Nasdaq has calculated for RCPI at the end of 2Q (6/30/2015) is not a function of Goldman Capital at all.
Of course that means Institutional Ownership has risen over 10% in just two quarters!
If you need to hire Tina’s broker to explain the simple math involved, please do so because Twicey is embarrassing all the other short bashers.