IT DOESNT do much for my feelings about Yahoo either every message board is infested with these non english speaking idiots all making the same amount and same #$%$. How ignorant can they be.
he could create more jobs by quit providing free loaders with pay checks. or he could approve the Keystone pipeline, or he could create a WPA type work program instead of handouts but then he couldnt own some votes
no the guy is a flake the whole post is not creditworthy nor is his second one. I have 24000 shares and I dont have to have no stinking board approve anything nor do I post everytime i add a little. This is not believable and if it is true he.she deserves the #$%$ they are getting very childish at best and at worst just downright untruthful
and so we begin the govt will decide who dies and who lives in our new socialized medicine What will be the determinants in whether you get health care? the budget of the US govt or your non existent private insurance. quality of care and treatment will decrease in the years to come. You can say Obama didnt know but he knew enough to postpone it til he was reelected and to postpone some parts til he is out of office
my real thought was 20 but I didnt want ot sound crazy so I put 10 plus but yes depending on who is first on a drug tamperproof oxycodone will be big.
I think they will share profits after manufacturing cost equally, what it means to me is the quality of the partner in being able to put forth a sales force to sell the drug and how actively they push for sales. IPCI doesnt have a sales force or a presence in any doctors office at this point and this would hamper sales for them compaing to a partner like PAR that has been around for a while and has many contacts and reps that wvisit offices regularly. I feel they will cut a better deal and the profits will be higher for Rexista as it is a NDA and will have a patent and be priced better. Oxycodone that is not anti abusive will be going by the wayside once drug abusive alternatives become available. for two reasons, docs wont prescribe it and the FDA could eliminate it by law. This really could bring in huge amounts of money. With the right partner it could cause this if approved tomorrow to go to upper teens. But it isnt coming tommorrow and they havent agreed to a partner yet so it will depend on others that are also in the channel for this type of product and who gets there first. If it were to get above $20 I say they need to split to get more shares out there or sell more shares to rasie enough funds for staff for production and sales but they do need to increase the float to make it harder to manipulate at some point. 22M shares is hardly anything heck even I own .5% of the stock which means 200 people like me could own the company, heck in reality if I sold all my other stocks and bought this one I could own 10% of the company. Are there 9 others than want to own it with me lol.just kidding dont want any SEC problems I am not soliciting just joking. been down that trail once and not again.
I would agree my feelings are
1) any ANDA approval they go to 7 with or without partner
2) rexista approval they go to 10 plus'
3) parnter on an Anda or rexista will depend on up front fee but they wont announce it so it goes to $5 to $6
the problem I have if they dont get partners is not the facility as they have it ready, it is the marketing force that they need to bring it in a good way with lots of sales to market, It is why I am glad they have PAR and hope for further deals with them. They need to get 4 or 5 of these drugs bringing in money before they try to manufacture and sell which will eat up a large amount of money to accomplish in getting the workers for manufacturing and sales force. It needs to eventually happen but later rather than sooner but they may not get the choice and have to do it. I really am eager to see this last quarters ER the first half of April. It could be very instrumental in the price of this stock and the sales numbers on Focalin will tell whether several posters on this board go onto permanent ignore.
not true look at your balance sheet, under your theory if a company went bankrupt and you couldnt sell the stock you didnt lose any money.
but if your estate is big enough the estate taxes will be worse than the income taxes.
the dividend may not go away but the value of the stock could go down, some may say but I collected 3 dividends while you waited to get a price 20 cents lower but you dont really believe my money is sitting idle all that time waiting do you, Money needs to be kept working. First I am usually always fully loaded so when I buy this it will be with margin that I pay 3.25% interest on and then If I sell something else the margin will be covered so the dividend will more than cover the interest but I will get my capital gains and the difference other wise you are really kidding yourself when the value goes down you have lost your return look at your balance sheet. If earnings dont cover dividend then you are not really getting all the dividend you are getting the earnings and selling part of the company to get the rest. It is a false sense of yield you are looking at. I have had many investments and return is always figured on purchase and sales price and income in between.
I think I will pick near bottom or I wont get it, I am more interested in capital appreciation and if I get a dividend while I wait great but I am not interested in a CD. I want a shjort term trade or I would go elsewhere with my funds or stay elsewhere. I have this on my radar for a certain price as I do DE and a few others. For growth where I have most of my funds I have Jazz, Gild, Hnr, and IPCI. I want at least a 24% annual yield, last year was 48% 4 yrs previously 24 to 25% current year to date was 21% now 16%. I really feel I can do above 40% again this year. so 12% would be a serious disappointment GLTU
I emailed the author of the bloomberg article on deal moving forward and he said most of VZ discussions are with Pluspetrol and not HNR which fits in well with my feelings on the decision making and what is needed or wanted.
i think you are looking at it wrong, Some index funds have so many shares of each stock in the index and they cant buy more or less and cant short THEY HAVE to buy the correct percentages in the index. Those index funds will sell on last trading day in May near end of day or however the exchange allows them to liquidate their holding but most likely on the last day of trading before June 1. just as the S&P did on feb 28th. the pressure up to then will be mutual funds, retail etc but not the index funds. Shoud be extremely interesting and as slick has stated a good opportunity but till then I will be on sideline or elsewhere unless it hits 10.40 then I load the truck regardless
you mean like Ellen Degenerate calling Liza Minelli a drag queen. She sure wouldnt like being called a female #$%$.
I stand corrected i was looking at the monthly the weeklies were at 20 cents when she bought them or $4000 and now at 12 cents. penny player out of the money guaranteed to be throwing it away. extremely poor play high risk Like soaking $4000 in gasoline and then throwing it in the fire and wondering what happened to it.
I think you are correct the funds wont liquidate until the last day and that will be the opportunity to buy, thanks for the information which will help me make up my mind. They really cant sell until that date as their fund is locked in until the change takes place .
I was wondering the same thing as I was wanting to buy some for a trade and thought 10.85 was good until the S&P announcement then I lowered it to 10.80 then the russell announcement came out and it will linger til june 1 so not sure but I know that if it gets to 10.40 I load up but doubt it gets there without a one time event and the russell will be spread out too much.