Your question is not based upon reality. You intentionally lessen the crimes committed to support your weak and wrong assertions. Many business owners had their business ruined not just windows broken. Failure to enforce the law resulted in chaos. When the laws were enforced the chaos subsided. Understand?
If given a choice to uphold the law and protect innocent business owners by arresting criminals or allow criminals to continue breaking the law which would you take?
How it it considered a Government handout when your example results in the corporation sending less $$$ in taxes than without the deduction? The corporation simply gets to keep more of THEIR $$$$$$. No handout involved. I suggest you consider using less misleading words to mare accurately describe what is occurring. Assuming you are interested in accuracy.
I wonder if that reporter will have a similar line of questioning for Hillary? Why do I doubt that he will?
These Tornado thingy's, are they a new phenomena? Are they made by terrorists?
Well, when we used to WIN wars we were united as a nation in the outcome of WINNING. Starting with Vietnam we allowed public sentiment to sway decisions resulting in inferior tactics and early withdrawals. Leaders were coerced into decisions based upon which way the political winds were blowing instead of making real leadership decisions that were at times unpopular. Ask your self how long did we occupy Germany and Japan with a presence?
Just curious, what is the origin of the $$$ used to support all of those government programs?