% | $
Quotes you view appear here for quick access.

Time Warner Inc. Message Board

robinfamily1818 161 posts  |  Last Activity: Jul 3, 2015 7:29 AM Member since: Jan 1, 2004
SortNewest  |  Oldest  |  Highest Rated Expand all messages
  • robinfamily1818 by robinfamily1818 Jul 3, 2015 7:29 AM Flag

    Happy Fourth of July to all longs and others - even Carolyn Novice!!!!!!

  • robinfamily1818 robinfamily1818 Jul 2, 2015 9:33 PM Flag

    Disney has a clear path for Star Wars. I saw one commentator that suggested that $1 billion world wide first week is possible. If that happens, I think it could do the same the next week (which is vacation week here, and probably elsewhere too).

    And that is only the beginning. The only issue I have is that Disney has no new movies in August and September. Antman better be good.

  • Reply to

    Share Buyback

    by arby013 Jul 1, 2015 8:35 PM
    robinfamily1818 robinfamily1818 Jul 2, 2015 8:55 AM Flag

    I'm not sure what numbers you are looking at. I'm sure that there are some stock options, exercised, that they are buying back. But they are steadily buying backs shares, and it has reduced the number outstanding. It might be that you're not factoring the shares that they issued to buy Lucas Films (of late), and Marvel and Pixar.

    Of course, it is more expensive to buy back stock at 110, than 90, or 60, or 30, and the bang for the buck is less. In retrospect, they should have leveraged everything they could to buy back stock when it was in the 30's. But, then, Iger is plenty savvy for me.

  • robinfamily1818 robinfamily1818 Jul 1, 2015 10:13 PM Flag

    The remarkable thing about Disney is that it went ex dividend today, which means it really hit a new high. And I don't think it's Disney's movies that is powering it - Inside Out certainly is a real hit - it has done 200 million so far, could hit 250 by the weekend, but should begin to level off soon after (unless it has a "frozen" pickup in it). It does ease any concern that Pixar was in any trouble, but only makes up for the frustration of Tomorrow Land, and the lack of an overwhelming Avengers at 1.37 billion (it opens in Japan this weekend - maybe they expect a huge box office there). Maybe the huge haul of Jurassic World leads to confirmation that Star Wars will easily beat $2 billion (I'm holding out for $3 billion).

    I think the Parks are really booming, that TV has some nice results in it, and that consumer products are really hitting a nice level. But, unless Antman is a huge huge hit, Disney isn't going to have another movie for about 3 months. I think Disney will hit some nice numbers soon, extend with the earnings, but then level off in September and October. If the "Good Dinosaur" is a big hit (not guaranteed as some are not impressed with the trailer), we're not going into Star Wars with a lot of momentum. We will see 125 - but I am holding firm for January, 2016.

    (and, for what it matters, Cinderella has hit $200 million, and is still drawing in some real money).

  • robinfamily1818 robinfamily1818 Jul 1, 2015 8:36 PM Flag

    It's not sitting near highs, it is at its high. It went ex dividend today - add 66 cents to the closing price. When Disney announces over $1.50 per share in profits for the quarter just ended, and you realize that it will earn nicely over $5.00 a share this year, and multiply it by 25, then you will realize that 125 could be fair value. And I know that 25 is a high pe, but not for a growing stock. And not for a stock with such strong brands. And not for a stock that has Star Wars on its calendar in December.

  • robinfamily1818 robinfamily1818 Jun 30, 2015 1:09 PM Flag

    Your references to Kramer and Buffet are interesting.

    As to Kramer, to whom you look to for support to sell Disney, he has said that Disney is a stock to hold forever (or at least a very long time). He has not suggested that holders sell and take the profits.

    On Buffet, I read that he had purchase Disney in the early 1960's, and sold when he had a profit of about $50 million about 6 months later. In all due deference, he has said that this was one of his biggest mistakes. It certainly contradicts his holding of well known brands.

    I'm not a trader. Something in me won't let me do that. I look for value. Disney has value. A lot of it. For nearly 2 years I have felt that disney was marching to 125 by early next year, and nothing has changed (yes, Avengers 2 wasn't a complete blow out, and Tomorrow Land hurt, but Inside Out is making up for that). And Iger's extension for 2 years to 2018 augers well (I think 200 is very possible). Sit back and enjoy.

  • robinfamily1818 robinfamily1818 Jun 26, 2015 11:25 PM Flag

    I'm glad I ask good questions.

    But I am very optimistic about the next earnings report. The Tomorrowland box office is quite disappointing. I was hoping that they would do better overseas - they haven't. But they wouldn't have announced a dividend at this time if they weren't happy with the results of this quarter so far. I think 1.50 to 1.55 is likely when they report.

  • robinfamily1818 robinfamily1818 Jun 26, 2015 3:00 PM Flag

    So does this mean it will go up, down or whatever, in the short run. And how will the ex-dividend date of July 6 affect everything?

  • robinfamily1818 robinfamily1818 Jun 25, 2015 7:59 AM Flag

    by the way - I checked my earlier posts and saw that, a few days ago, I said that the dividend this year would be between 1.25 to 1.40 - I was right in the middle - not bad.

    And the nice thing about this surprise dividend is that it reassures disney holders that the poor reception that Tomorrowland received is not going to damage the stock much.

  • robinfamily1818 robinfamily1818 Jun 25, 2015 1:07 AM Flag

    Interesting dividend move. It surprised me. It goes against them trying to minimize expense in distributing dividends given the single shareholders - maybe these single shareholders are trading in their single shares with the stock price jumping over 100.

    It also bodes well for the next quarterly earnings release.\\

    See what happens after you trade and not hold long term.

  • Reply to

    Disney America

    by coz_man_2000 Jun 18, 2015 9:33 AM
    robinfamily1818 robinfamily1818 Jun 23, 2015 11:05 AM Flag

    It seems that, when this was proposed in the early 1990's, there was general state support and local governmental support, but opposition from historians and related groups. And it was to be a historical theme park.

    It seems strange that Disney would revisit the same concept because it would face the same opposition now. And Disney is very self conscious of its image. No reason to risk anything that would be a ten year project.

    However, The Sweet Briar closing, and now reopening, does seem strange. It was sudden, and its turn around sudden. And this was not a full blown Disney resort, but something that would feed off of DC's tourism.

    But this is a no go. Disney is concentrating on Shanghai and turning around Euro Disney. After things settle down, in about a year, they will carefully chart out their next venture. There next CEO, if it is Tom Staggs, has significant Parks experience, and will make measured choses.

  • robinfamily1818 by robinfamily1818 Jun 23, 2015 9:48 AM Flag

    They are already talking about the "Speith" effect. This would be nice, as it would move stock (and expensive stock at that) through the door, generating sales and profits, and reducing carrying costs.

    Let's hope that this great hope does pan out. He does seem to be a well spoken and humble person.

  • Reply to

    Fast $ says this going to $125.

    by robinfamily_1818 Jun 22, 2015 12:33 PM
    robinfamily1818 robinfamily1818 Jun 22, 2015 4:29 PM Flag

    please note that this is not my posting - you're posing on a derivation of my name

  • robinfamily1818 robinfamily1818 Jun 22, 2015 11:17 AM Flag

    And, at least today, it is a nice beneficiary. For, at least today, the wind is at its back. A new (euro) high, and a little rise in the euro, is helping it to a new US high. But you are a trader. And more will, in the short term for trading purposes, will need a real Greek settlement - or are they buying on the rumor, and will sell on the news?

    That is why I don't trade - I like the longer term.

    And how is that trading of Disney going? Did you catch the last jump over the past two weeks from 108 to 114? (sorry about that - I couldn't help myself).

    I do hope that you are enjoying your family time. I really do appreciate your views.

  • Reply to

    Time For A 4 For 1 Stock Split

    by bigoilboy Jun 19, 2015 5:54 PM
    robinfamily1818 robinfamily1818 Jun 22, 2015 10:10 AM Flag

    Have you read anything on this board about splits before?

  • robinfamily1818 robinfamily1818 Jun 22, 2015 10:09 AM Flag

    First, to follow the topic name, Disney's timing for Inside Out seems just about perfect.

    I think you're a little too hard on Avengers 2. Marvel has a plan (one that I hope to say in the future was a very very nice plan). This is a stepping stone in that plan. They needed to present a variety of characters of the Marvel Universe for future movies. I would simply say that they were trying too hard in this movie.

    That being said, remember that that the lead up to Avengers (1) was nice, but not excessive. Thor and Captain America did only 180 or so domestically - they were even called commercials for Avengers (1). Avengers (1) exceeded everyone's expectations. And it was a good movie - I watched a little of it last night with my son and family, and it was concise, bantering, simply but with just the right number of twists.

    But I agreed that they did too much in Avengers/Ultron. If you are right that this was originally 3.5 hours, then certainly a lot was lost. They even spent too much money. If it was 3.5 hours, I think they should have made it into two movies - 1 hour and 45 minutes for each part would have been about right, would have explained everything better, and would have been a better spending of money.

    But let's not complain too much. 450 million domestically is nothing to sneeze at. And Disney will look at this movie, understand what they did right and wrong, and learn a lot that they will put into future movies. Maybe that is why Avengers 3 is in two parts.

  • Reply to

    Agree with robinfamily comment--Inside Out

    by donofoblivion Jun 21, 2015 1:53 PM
    robinfamily1818 robinfamily1818 Jun 21, 2015 3:02 PM Flag

    Thank you.

    But on the "slip" on the Avengers - let me say two things - I was disappointed in it as we are going to just about hit 1.5 billion (and that's not in the bag by any chance), and I was looking for 2 billion. But others thought that it would be merely a 1 billion. I think 1.5 b isn't any thing to be frustrated with, although Disney may have missed an opportunity.

  • Reply to

    Even share holders need a raise

    by georgie156 Jun 18, 2015 9:53 AM
    robinfamily1818 robinfamily1818 Jun 21, 2015 2:58 PM Flag

    I'm not. But I underestimated Avengers Ultron and Tomorrowland. I think we will break 120 by the end of the year, and then see 125 very soon thereafter. And I really think that Iger wouldn't have agreed to stay two more years if he didn't expect much more - and that is what I am really looking at.

  • Inside Out seems to have done over 30 million on Friday - maybe as much as 34 million. This may translate into as much as 90+ million - much better than the 60 million or so I had seen predicted a few days ago.

    It is the second best Pixar opening (no chance to beat Toy Story 4). And, with a multiplier of 4.1 (typical pixar multiplier) - that puts it well over 300 million. And, with a clear path for this movie for about three weeks (Minions is the next children friendly movie on July 10), that is very doable. Maybe $1 billion worldwide isn't out of the question.

    This could make up for Tomorrowland's disappointment and Avenger's flat numbers (although 1.5 billion is nothing to sneeze at).

    Amazing what a really good story can do for you. Now, if JJ Abrams can give us a good story for Star Wars, we might see the $3 billion I speculated about a few months ago. And I did see one article this morning that suggested some believed a $1 billion worldwide opening weekend was possible.

    A real sigh of relief. I was getting a little concerned (because I believe Disney has under performed on Av and T by at least $500 billion). Next up - Antman - if that could give us $250 domestic and $750 worldwide, we'd be setting up the rest of the year (and more) nicely.

  • robinfamily1818 robinfamily1818 Jun 20, 2015 10:24 AM Flag

    I had actually thought that Furious 7 demonstrating an appetite for these types of and all movies, and Avengers was going to ride a wave. And Jurassic Park's numbers may simply say that movie goers like action movies.

    Avengers was good - but it simply tried to hard. A simpler movie might have done better (and saved money). They didn't need that Thor pool scene, and a few others.

88.49+0.18(+0.20%)Jul 2 4:00 PMEDT