Sat, Dec 27, 2014, 11:34 AM EST - U.S. Markets closed

Recent

% | $
Quotes you view appear here for quick access.

Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings Inc. Message Board

runnercedar 2 posts  |  Last Activity: May 7, 2012 4:01 PM Member since: May 7, 2012
SortNewest  |  Oldest  |  Highest Rated Expand all messages
  • Lamar Advertising Co. in Florida is being sued and faces criminal prosecution for illegally killing thousands of trees for the sake of making roadside billboards more visible.

    The controversy came to light after a company employee, Robert Barnhart, was fired after he refused to continue helping poison trees.

    Barnhart has sued Lamar Advertising, claiming the company retaliated against him. According to the whistleblower, Lamar employees would stop along roadways, hack into trees with a machete and pour herbicide into the cuts, causing the trunks to die.

    Lamar boasts that it has an inventory of “over 155,000 outdoor advertising structures,”, more than any other U.S. outdoor advertising firm. According to an investigation by Fair Warning, the company has had multiple run-ins with the law in different states. For example, in 2008 the state of Connecticut sued Lamar after it removed 83 trees along Interstate 84. The company had a permit to trim the trees, not kill them and cut them down. In October 2010, a judge found Lamar liable and it paid to replant the trees.

    Dan Freeman, deputy director of maintenance with the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), told Fair Warning, “The billboard industry-well, my impression of them is they’re kind of lawless…. We’ve been victim a number of times to people who come in the middle of the night, with a chainsaw, and just kind of clear cut the area immediately in front of one of these supergraphics or a large billboard.”

    Lamar has lobbied heavily in several states for the right to “enhance” billboard views.

    Lamar is not the only billboard company accused of killing trees to improve the views of billboards. Bill Salter Outdoor Advertising is said to have cleared more than 2,000 trees. allgov.com

  • Lamar Advertising Co. in Florida is being sued and faces criminal prosecution for illegally killing thousands of trees for the sake of making roadside billboards more visible.

    The controversy came to light after a company employee, Robert Barnhart, was fired after he refused to continue helping poison trees.

    Barnhart has sued Lamar Advertising, claiming the company retaliated against him. According to the whistleblower, Lamar employees would stop along roadways, hack into trees with a machete and pour herbicide into the cuts, causing the trunks to die.
    Lamar boasts that it has an inventory of “over 155,000 outdoor advertising structures,”, more than any other U.S. outdoor advertising firm. According to an investigation by Fair Warning, the company has had multiple run-ins with the law in different states. For example, in 2008 the state of Connecticut sued Lamar after it removed 83 trees along Interstate 84. The company had a permit to trim the trees, not kill them and cut them down. In October 2010, a judge found Lamar liable and it paid to replant the trees.

    Dan Freeman, deputy director of maintenance with the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), told Fair Warning, “The billboard industry-well, my impression of them is they’re kind of lawless…. We’ve been victim a number of times to people who come in the middle of the night, with a chainsaw, and just kind of clear cut the area immediately in front of one of these supergraphics or a large billboard.”

    Lamar has lobbied heavily in several states for the right to “enhance” billboard views.

    Lamar is not the only billboard company accused of killing trees to improve the views of billboards. Bill Salter Outdoor Advertising is said to have cleared more than 2,000 trees. allgov.com

CCO
9.96-0.2300(-2.26%)Dec 26 4:02 PMEST

Trending Tickers

i
Trending Tickers features significant U.S. stocks showing the most dramatic increase in user interest in Yahoo Finance in the previous hour over historic norms. The list is limited to those equities which trade at least 100,000 shares on an average day and have a market cap of more than $300 million.