% | $
Quotes you view appear here for quick access.

Silver Wheaton Corp. Message Board

ryugo82 10760 posts  |  Last Activity: Mar 9, 2015 9:59 AM Member since: Jul 9, 2009
SortNewest  |  Oldest  |  Highest Rated Expand all messages
  • ryugo82 ryugo82 Mar 9, 2015 9:59 AM Flag

    anyway as I said we shall see which silver companies will go down first.

    exk ag hl paas, svm etc.

    the first ones down you should probably call fraud and pat yourself in the back.
    but if somehow svm survives then you need to go into a hole.


  • ryugo82 ryugo82 Mar 9, 2015 9:58 AM Flag

    yep we do verify information which was how we caught Jon Carnes Pants down.

    because you know we compare and contrast to the over all market and how companies work in the industry.

    For you guys to claim scam when all other silver companies do it and not call them all scams is disingenuous.

    My bet again is that of silver equivalent conversion.
    all too often people make that mistake.

    you guys did so Jon Carnes did so and so many analysts did so.

    We already said how many times in the past
    GC mines is about 50% base metals and 50% silver.
    but those base metals are quite high quality making it much easier especially now since base metals never fell much more than silver.

    50% lead, zinc, sulfur, small amounts of copper.
    That was the assessment we had a year ago about those mines.

    to think that suddenly it would be 75% silver and asianvest patting himself on the back on something we already know then complaining after we call him out on making stupid accusations especially when numbers line up anyway is ridiculous in itself.

    this is why I said financial types are a useless bunch all they know how to do is count beans.

    balancing the books doesn't mean they are not bad yep that's right
    our TBTF banks that put good money in bad assets and calling it good to borrow more.
    fact is if they are mark to market they'd be worthless and 50% of the TBTF banks would go under. but they have been slowly leeching their way back to profits using tax money.
    notice borrow at 0 unlimited and buy bonds for 2-3%. not their money so why should they care.
    free extra 30-100 billion per year.

    where's the out cry besides the little people that know the game they play?

    Stupid people will not whine about obvious fraud but will about technicalities that they want to force just because they lost the moral argument and have nothing to stand on.

    their poster boy even revoked their USA citizenship for godsakes.
    you people have literally no moral standards to stand on
    face it

  • Reply to

    Interesting read on solar ...

    by idealcarpentry Feb 24, 2015 9:23 AM
    ryugo82 ryugo82 Feb 24, 2015 4:47 PM Flag

    well to be honest

    I did a google search a while back about this
    lithium ion batteries provide the highest density currently but arguably more dangerous than the rest.
    so it needs protection to be used correctly, that increases the cost because it is dangerous to use without it.

    arguably the best ones with the highest energy density are likely more reactive

    here from a site
    "In general higher energy densities are obtained by using more reactive chemicals. The downside is that more reactive chemicals tend to be unstable and may require special safety precautions. The energy density is also dependent on the quality of the active materials used in cell construction with impurities limiting the cell capacities which can be achieved. This is why cells from different manufacturers with similar cell chemistries and similar construction may have a different energy content and discharge performance."

    As a result if you can find a way to safely use more reactive chemicals then you have a winner

    (I doubt the board trolls will try to find a way to make the world a better place though.)

    so what are the most reactive elements?

    another google search in 2010:

    they said that a company was developing it but was using more carbon atoms than fluorine atoms.

    instead of that you need to find combinations that will enable the highest fluorine ion content without making it dangerous.

    or perhaps other high reactive atoms in combinations.
    that is a hint shall we say

    chemistry class done.
    the mining trolls won't ever understand science though

  • ryugo82 ryugo82 Feb 22, 2015 4:05 PM Flag

    UM did you read the statements correctly?
    Henan Luoning Hunan Guangdong Total
    Silver (Ag) 19,671 $ ‐ $ $ 2,754 $ 22,425
    Gold (Au) 725 ‐ 11 736
    Lead (Pb) 10,217 ‐ 1,805 12,022
    Zinc (Zn) 1,780 ‐ 3,146 4,926
    Sulphur (S) ‐ ‐ 138 138
    $ ‐ 32,393 $ $ 7,854 $ 40,247

    copy and pasted exactly format is hard to read thanks to yahoo.

    but you get the picture perhaps you got confused again with silver EQUIVALENT minerals like most miners always used but somehow it concerns you how? we already know that the Guangdong mines are mostly base metals rather than silver itself.

    we talked about this last year remember?
    what you don't

    Is that you again Jon Carnes still can't pass up a chance to slander when you have nothing anymore.
    seriously people that can't read in general should perhaps not even bother working and instead go on gov welfare you are doing more harm than good to the economy.

    then again you guys did try to lawyer up to steal from the company some more where you can.
    way to go man.

    you really are the losers of the world
    enlightening the world with your stupidity.

  • Reply to

    good news

    by wwsportsplayer Feb 12, 2015 4:50 PM
    ryugo82 ryugo82 Feb 12, 2015 6:58 PM Flag

    probably caused by the shorts hiring lawyers to steal money from the company again and again to harass them which was why svm made the condition to be NO more lawsuits as if shorts keep pursuing it then they would get nothing.

    Because shorts know they have low chances of winning anyway they took the deal instead of keeping their harassment up to drain the company quarter after quarter.

    worry not those write offs should be the last time unless shorts want to commit even more obvious fraud which if they do now would be by far too obvious.

  • Reply to

    Current dividend yield is now about 7%

    by marionpolk2000 Feb 3, 2015 11:59 AM
    ryugo82 ryugo82 Feb 4, 2015 1:46 PM Flag

    unfortunately I cannot post the article link

    there were rumors of hedging.
    but those were the numbers I got when I obtained it.
    look it up please i cannot keep providing every single data point

  • Reply to

    Current dividend yield is now about 7%

    by marionpolk2000 Feb 3, 2015 11:59 AM
    ryugo82 ryugo82 Feb 4, 2015 11:45 AM Flag

    OIL HEDGES 4Q14 1Q15 2Q15 3Q15 4Q15 1Q16 2Q16
    WTI Swap Volume (Bbl/d) 2,446 2,500 2,473 1,957 815 165 165
    Price ($/Bbl) $ 93.79 $ 94.76 $ 94.28 $ 91.22 $ 90.87 $ 90.20 $ 90.20

    Production, Sept. 2014 (Boe/d) 3,348 3,348 3,348 3,348 3,348 3,348 3,348
    % Hedged 73% 75% 74% 58% 24% 5% 5%

    cough that is not fully hedged then while articles say they are hedged.
    so I would stand corrected


    do not know the complete hard numbers yet.

  • Reply to

    Current dividend yield is now about 7%

    by marionpolk2000 Feb 3, 2015 11:59 AM
    ryugo82 ryugo82 Feb 4, 2015 7:46 AM Flag

    mcep is rumored to have already hedged 2 years worth of oil/gas so they will not be raising div any time soon.
    too bad.

    if oil ever gets down to 40 bucks and stays there for 2 years mcep should outperform others.

    but it is in no danger of default.

  • I'll wait for the earnings reports that are reported after calculating the lawyers stealing money.

    after that lets see what the shorts will do to sabotage the business further is there more we shall see if that is it then shorts are dead in the long run.

    I'll see you 1 year from now.
    I think I educated or scared off enough would be weak longs for now.

    Do some research next time loser longs that just want a quick flip you never do research.
    this goes for loser shorts like oopsie and asianvest

    oospie said he only has 1500 dollars shorted
    and asian? obvious working for a larger hedgefund otherwise he is an idiot.

    anyway wait for him when he has his next short position in place and needs to do his bosses bidding
    he will come back to gloat only to be proven morally wrong again

    but would say he is right.
    price wise maybe but then again prices are fake.
    traders always say point to the tape but in reality we know it is fake we just say it because we make money off it.

    the real truth is not though.

  • Reply to

    just got the BS CA lawyers letter

    by ryugo82 Feb 2, 2015 10:46 PM
    ryugo82 ryugo82 Feb 2, 2015 10:48 PM Flag

    also I may add it may take a few 100 dollars worth of time to gather all the necessary documents prompting it not to be worth the hassle for 90% of the shareholders for 1% back in losses.

    but it depends what your motivations are.

  • Well just got it and it is 1-2 days from the deadline.

    Really now are they #$%$? or really smart trying to make it so that the least amount of people would know what they are truly up to?

    Their whole objective is to steal money from the company while only benefiting themselves.
    We already know svm is innocent but they #$%$ and on.

    We should in fact sue these lawyers instead along with Jon Carnes.
    their ploy has been long exposed already.

    anyway still it may be wise to send many claims in and force them to have the least amount of payout.
    but declare to the judge we do not want more money from svm but we want the lawyers to not have any pay or as low as it possibly can be as we think they are douche bags of society along with Jon Carnes.



  • Reply to

    class action lawsuit

    by loharr626 Jan 27, 2015 2:36 PM
    ryugo82 ryugo82 Feb 2, 2015 9:12 PM Flag

    I already said this lawsuit is just a sham.
    for those that could have gone to the hearings they should have went to curse the lawyers out not towards svm to pay more

    but that the lawyers are as* wipes of the lowest order
    not only to they sue an innocent company to steal money

    but they never intended on giving anyone else the money besides themselves either.
    hence forth I want people to file and go there directly to tell the judge We do not want to sue SVM

    but in fact if they are forced to pay we want the lawyers to GET NOTHING or MUCH LESS
    then split it among all the shareholders on record even those that have not participated.
    these people are worthless ambulance chasers.

    unfortunately I would waste more time and energy going to their location which means very little chance of anyone doing so which they are banking on.

    they are lucky aren't they. Worthless losers attacking from afar with no risk to themselves.

  • Reply to

    Jon Carnes hearing tomorrow (1/30)

    by stockinvestment Jan 29, 2015 11:04 AM
    ryugo82 ryugo82 Feb 2, 2015 4:38 PM Flag

    when someone thumbs you down for asking when results come back.

    you know that the perpetrators are monitoring the boards.
    good job you exposed yourself

    but then again already knew that was their true nature as these jokers always are just that.

    notes: they were on the zagg forums spamming with alts
    seekingalpha spamming with their alts called worthlesspennies indeed worthless and his boss alfred little the little fat man.

    I still remember 3 years investigating them though I wont spend hard earned money to further it.

    Just by observing from the sidelines and see how they react I can already assess what types of people they truly are. But I am sure they know what type of person I am by now as well.

  • Reply to

    Jon Carnes hearing tomorrow (1/30)

    by stockinvestment Jan 29, 2015 11:04 AM
    ryugo82 ryugo82 Feb 2, 2015 8:53 AM Flag

    anyone know when they will have their results back?

  • Reply to

    #$%$ hearing concluded

    by trader_v03 Jan 30, 2015 4:37 PM
    ryugo82 ryugo82 Feb 2, 2015 8:52 AM Flag

    Wish I could hear the results
    or have a transcript.

  • ryugo82 ryugo82 Jan 30, 2015 1:41 PM Flag

    basically trade one of the only miner that can survive in a low silver price for other miners that have negative earnings

    well good job.
    but yes you are right manipulators are over the top and are trying to find any excuse possible to steal more money from the company and then say I told you so when they were the ones that were robbing the company in the first place

  • Reply to

    Signs pointing to a mjor move...

    by clay.autery Jan 22, 2015 12:54 PM
    ryugo82 ryugo82 Jan 30, 2015 6:59 AM Flag

    never going to happen but if it does make sure to lower the premiums this time.
    last time premiums went up way too high...

    btw svm still made money at 15 dollar silver.
    like seriously.

    svm though is a 50% base metals producer and 50% silver/gold producer
    now for those that still say svm is a scam.
    well now 3 years still nothing?

    We shall wait for Jon Carnes conviction for his just deserts if there is any justice anyway.(not likely but here is hoping for good to win-(which good people never do))

    as for silver. lets wait for the dow S+P + nasdaq to crash by 50% first.

    but we also know the fed wont let that happen unless their cronies have put in place their pieces to extract as much wealth as they can from would be idiots.

    you think they don't calculate how much they lure in first before pulling the plug? LOL.

  • Reply to

    Jon Carnes hearing tomorrow (1/30)

    by stockinvestment Jan 29, 2015 11:04 AM
    ryugo82 ryugo82 Jan 29, 2015 12:47 PM Flag

    hmm thought it was 2014 Nov? shrug.

    About time.
    they better get at least punished those dirtbags.

    even his china shorts were suspicious of him for god sakes you know he smells funny then.

  • Reply to

    GeoInvesting's poor new website

    by stockinvestment Jan 14, 2015 12:33 PM
    ryugo82 ryugo82 Jan 28, 2015 10:38 PM Flag

    good luck I guess.

    hopefully geoinvesting will learn and not follow Jon Carnes footsteps.

  • Reply to

    GeoInvesting's poor new website

    by stockinvestment Jan 14, 2015 12:33 PM
    ryugo82 ryugo82 Jan 28, 2015 10:38 PM Flag

    well Jon Carnes reputation is quite bad right now ever since he targeted svm although he won the price war thanks in a large part to the silver crash.

    even geoinvesting was suspicious of Jon Carnes motives in that case. as well

    LLEN is another story I was suspicious of them for a while
    and was urging others in another forum to be careful but they didn't listen either.

    I asked and posted there in the comment section personally so I know.
    Luckily someone answered and they agreed. very suspicious indeed.

    I read on the forums as well they were all suspicious of Carnes at the time as well.
    Besides Carnes was always riding on the coat tails of everyone else and not truly doing his own homework.

    in the courts it was proven he tried to front run the silver shorts and had to make up stories to do it. He definitely had the bankster connections to know what rumors were going on though.

    but in the real world even his geologist said that his reporting of mining had problems so refused to go to court.

    svm tried to ask the geologist Carnes hired to testify but geologist refused as well because he just wanted to lay low until everything blew over.
    oh well.

    It smells really bad in his camp to be honest.

    Carnes was really lucky he didn't get his head chopped off must have bribed a lot of people I wonder if he made enough on shorting though to cover all the bills for bribery until now.

    And even now he's just playing around trying to gain reputation back while trying to harass the company that took him down because he made a mistake by accusing innocent people.

    His china immigrant employee though did indeed steal so he deserved jail time regardless of his accusations of him being charged on false charges they know what they did was wrong regardless.

    stealing ore that was worth 100's millions to them
    and still proving themselves wrong

    they had to change their report hoping people didn't know how to read mining reports
    and indeed NO one in the mass media could read it.

19.46+0.22(+1.14%)Apr 17 4:03 PMEDT