as you can see oppsie maker bot was based off the reprap model as it was starting to THREATEN the profits of 3d systems because they were so much cheaper and available to the public space.
to stem it corporations normally buy up other smaller competitors to centralize the system to retain the profits for themselves instead of open competition like in a capitalist society.
yes they didn't want to compete because it would quickly lower their profits in the 3d printing space.
here we have the founder of makerbot openly criticizing the new company and product.
but of course you wont find anything that wall street says of course.
because they are still in the middle of pumping it up with 0% loans and shorting the #$%$ out of anything that stands in their way.
but typical of you right?
this is war with producers/productive people/wealth creators vs trash gamblers/traders/banksters/mafia/thieves
the thieves have the government and FED on their side
while we can only rely on the truth as they constantly rob us.
mean while bit coins hits/passes 500 bucks
really now I guess my few bit coins are worth quite a bit now
but still geez. I guess I should have went all out and got many gpus and set up many computers to mine them previously but I know bit coins are also worthless unless others support it just the same as dollars.
anyway that sector is flooded with elites trying to take the coins now.
I just hope people will realize that once the bit coins mostly fall into the hands of the elites we would be wise to dump the currency and move onto something else we can use.
let the elites that want it all take it and move on.
they can buy the tulip bubble if they want we need to find a way for the banksters and the elites to BECOME the bag holder as they try to avoid being the bag holder and constantly makes others become the bag holders.
these elites always file for bankruptcy anyway so they can pass the debt to others with corporations.
we must file bankruptcy on them.
more data on the maker bot.
here is something from the founder of makerbot that 3d systems bought out.
a small excerpt of it:
"My name is Zachary Smith aka Hoeken. I have been building 3D printers since 2007 as part of the RepRap project. I created a non-profit foundation (the RRRF) dedicated to pushing open source 3D printing forward. In 2009, I invited my friends Adam Mayer and Bre Pettis to go into business with me building 3D printers. Thus, MakerBot Industries was born. Fast forward to April, 2012 when I was forced out of the very same company. As a result, I have zero transparency into the internal workings of the company that I founded. See this article by Chris Thompson for more infomation."
also even programmers in large institutions use hacked software ahem.
anyone cyrogen mod for android?
yes quite popular isn't it made by many hackers that you hate.
ps and it is free oops yes that's right.
decentralization is less efficient but it avoids the corruption caused by centralization.
therefore oopsie if you do not even understand the technology please do not gloat about your investment.
you seem to love using 3d printing against my analysis when I was the one whom did a paper on it way back and said it was good technology to decentralize the economy since the economy was corrupt.
planned obsolescence. I did say it was a necessary step in forcing manufacturers to become more honest and pass the savings back to the consumer. else they are useless
the purpose of volume savings was that after all.
corporations will not lower prices without competition after all.
therefore to lower prices there needs to be a base
to lower the base means to lower the price.
the base = DIY cost.
to reduce DIY cost forces manufactures to either make a better product or lower prices. to the point it is not worth it for the consumer to make it themselves.
that is the purpose of 3d printing for the economy.
giving better options to people when the market refuses to provide it to them because it would lower their profits.
remember clothes? they never fit? why buy them then make it yourself then. mark ups are insane when they cost 10 bucks to make they sell for 100 bucks
automated sewing machines then basically.
not like it is new just they are not sold to consumers dictated by the clothing industry most likely because they want people to consume not make their own stuff.
when you watch old Chinese shows or series or old movies you see the house wife always make the clothes remember? or do you not know that even(spoiled brat).
people just need to purchase the cloth then and cut them into how they want it.
ahem milling machines/cutting machines my argument stands. old tech.
you can consider investing in an rep rap company that evolves their 3d open source interface as it is cheaper than the ddd system they devised that costs the regular joe an arm and a leg.
sorry their system was not designed to free the public from the corporations after all they want to make money from the printer cartridges like a regular printer does.
now printers were hacked and now people devised ways to fill the toners themselves or make it extremely cheap
the printer industry will also start to die off in profits.
repeating this again
3d printing was suppose to decentralize the system so consumers DO NOT NEED TO CONSUME from the market and be taxed for it.
especially if they can reuse their filaments. if the recycling system is made the profit potential for ddd will just be dead then.
especially if others have it like the reprap created by hackers are more popular. especially when they perfect a way to recycle filaments.
then yes DDD will die later on.
I will await the hacker community for that day of perfection to dump the rest of my ddd stock.
they can pump all they want I made enough on ddd already this is just gravy for me in that side of the tech sector.
you see I am in many things not just SVM oopsie especially since I do technology work I know and read hacking forums and engineering forums as well.
and also science forums etc. unlike you that only read financial forums I do both. but of course I am not an expert at them which is why I learn from them.
also since you seem to like 3d printing so much what about milling machines or other automation techs eh they are basically the same thing.
3d printing puts dots on it.
the other machines talked about like sewing machines etc cut pieces from the items to make a whole product.
or chisel them out from a block.
the concept can be applied either way.
you can still recycle them
and that is the only thing recycling system so you can REUSE your filaments and blocks when you are done.
if we can make our clothes brand new again yes we dont need to shop anymore yay no more overpriced junk and waiting for sales.
also phones and smartphones tablet markets would crash much faster if it was like the desktop market when people could just DIY desktops.
that was why it took so long for the prices to crash.
the prices will crash btw.
intel chip is actually not as well designed as the ARM chips but Intel chips have more software support.
in the end it is not hardware that drives demand but the content on it.
the OS doesn't mean anything as well but what developers put on it does.
therefore the machines themselves are IRRELEVANT you need developers that make blueprints for them.
the more open the software is the easier it is for a developer will win the 3d printer race.
DDD is just another bubble. if they force their template onto the developers they will lose in the end.
reviewers are already bashing DDD product and it is in fact overpriced especially
compared to reprap
go look at 3d cubify by ddd
geez how low are the ratings.
but there are no real good stocks for 3d printers.
all the really good ones at affordable prices are made by hackers and engineers that deal with rep rap.
yes do you even know what that is I mentioned it so many times already. but being open source you cannot make money off it so easily TOO BAD
you can sell parts and make stuff to sell though. meaning actually work for your money now which I know you wont do.
please go look it up as I think you know nothing about the industry and what innovations are being worked on to compete with large corporations centralization.
centralization = problem of corruption
decentralization = problem of efficiency.
3d printing is not efficient or cheap but they kill the corruption of centralization
centralization may not even make what you want after all.
one size fits all does not fit.
thus 3d printing makes unique items cheaper and makes mass market items more expensive.
the old technology has distinct uses.
small companies should buy a 3d printer
larger companies should just build the infrastructure for mass manufacturing.
I will let the shares ride but I already took my principle off the table.
reason is simple OVER HYPED.
I hate buying OVER HYPED wall street plays.
when you do so I always remove some money at least my principle.
Now do I hate 3d printing HELL no I was one that researched it BEFORE YOU EVEN KNEW ABOUT IT.
it is extremely old technology after all.
only thing is what apple did simplify for mass consumption.
reprap is a better design to make a DIY design and much cheaper after all but no profit in that because it is OPEN SOURCE oops.
yes engineers like the rep rap better as it is like linux for operating systems. or unix per say.
apple built their os on top of unix
and microsoft ripped off apple.
sorry the open source is what I support more.
eventually the profit margins will fall through the floor for 3d printers in 5 years if
ddd does not grow by at least 10 fold then it cannot sustain 173 p/e
sorry that is bubble territory.
it was already bad at 5 fold increase necessary but now geez the 0% interest policy is insane.
and as a result stupid.
I hope the bubbles burst and people come to their senses
efficiency is not made by the 3d printers as mass automation will always be a lower cost.
what 3d printers offer is that it decreases the corruption that corporations induce because it decentralizes the manufacturing process forcing more competition.
not because 3d printing is more efficient or CHEAPER.
3d printing in reality is NOT CHEAPER than automated mass manufacturing.
it is in fact cheaper because it kills the corruption part of mass manufacturing by a single entity.
why pay them for profit margins and they pay slave labor to their workers when you can make it yourself eh?
the next step for this to work is making a machine that can recycle all garbage into something the 3d printer can use so that we DO NOT NEED TO BUY additives/filaments for the machines.
many hackers and engineers are devising this method.
at this point I kinda just want the whole system to go down and start again. I hope all the criminals die of cancer or something.
as it stands real important problems are unsolved etc FUKUSHIMA? yes it is still poisoning us.
and these supposed leaders are doing NOTHING about it even as everyone yells and screams at them to do something.
instead they try to weasel their way out and say if we help we are not held responsible for our design flaws ahem "GE basically"
utter and complete bs these guys should all just die a horrible death already.
sigh I have given up on humanity now I am just going to throw in the towel and live as a hermit in the woods and keep to myself instead of caring so much what happens to us humans.
and the financial press keeps putting activist investors in our faces like they are important or something give us a break those guys are just pigs that play with stolen wealth.
bunch of parasite leeches dirt bags.
ps maybe if we can decentralize the silver held it could work.
the problem is government confiscation at the exchanges which prevents usage of silver and gold as currency not that they would have any problem on their own.
government is forbbiding it is the problem
they tried that but USA confiscated the gold and silver when it was centrally held and the public owned it and spent it like currency.
they said it was helping terrorism you know like HSBC has been funding terrorism and drug lords.
(just an excuse)
if it is ever centralized it will be confiscated.
the solution for bit coins was DECENTRALIZATION as well.
because it was mostly centralized at mt gox the USA HFT FED backed traders went there to play their games and pumped and dumped it and crashed it beforehand.
but because unlike futures they could not naked short it like on comex bit coins was spared.
it is very very obvious what is in fact going on now in the currency markets and futures market.
only idiots do not see this reality.
in the mean time they still mask it as much as possible. it is pathetic
anyway take your physical and move along boys.
thats correct sorry there is no fully owned land there all people have is a lease and then they rent it longer if they want.
yes gov owns all the land and everyone else just rents from her.
in the old days of kings.
the king owns all the land he collects taxes from it.
see response from message board users that have to pay to even post there...
I do not like paying to debate as a result I refuse to post on their website.
either way they win then pointless. why do they not pay me for pointing out mistakes then if that is the case.
users generate content ahem.
Lord, this is impossible to get a response out of these guys... LLEN specifically states they (#14556) In Response to original message: #14546 posted by TicTock on 24-Sep-2013 11:29 AM
Lord, this is impossible to get a response out of these guys...
LLEN specifically states they have other revenues from coal washing, and geoinvesting goes silent.
What kind of hack outfit is this that they cannot even discuss their own research.
Tic? Hello? anyone out there to help out ?
reason why I am here is because of your history profile yes I do look at them and what you guys post.
but anyway umbisam i would like to take a look at the numbers for export and which countries were importing coal.
hmm? umbisam I do not understand just export coal/fossil fuels to japan there is huge demand there as there is an energy shortage.
but also I do not own llen anyway for all intents and purposes I do not believe in companies that pay no dividends especially if they are profitable.
but yes where is the profit coming from.
domestically forbidden exports etc?your previous accusation on svm a few weeks back is totally irrational though umbisam even geoinvesting when I asked them on Jon Carnes articles they agreed with me that his articles were trash.
but felt their analyst was wrongly arrested. but the thing is their analyst stole as a result in all morality throughout the world he already committed a crime never the less especially in a place like china you could get killed for that crime. besides the analyst was from china anyway which was why he was hired to go back to be a spy.
anyway suggestion to lay off on that they already lost the moral argument. publishing on barrons publishing on all news sources with his/her connections wont change reality they screwed up their so called 90% rate because there is still 10% fail rate.
Even Jon admitted that he only had a 90% hit rate. when you hit the 10% what do you do then did he apologize um nope.
his own data contradicts himself already 99% of all people proved this already yet he/and his buddies didn't
admit sorry oops. geez. too much pride or that rep is necessary in churning this scam game played eh?
but there was no reason to even go after the company the stock would have fallen regardless of WHAT you or they did because the miners themselves throughout the world were being shorted by the central banks because they were intentionally shorting gold and silver to hide their own fraud of stealing wealth by inflation and giving it to people like you gamblers
seems like it.
but geoinvesting still seems more credible than him but is still a bit shady. I already knew that this one may be targeted as well given time.
and also I never said bio techs were 100% losers but 99% of them are trash over time.
do you see 90% of their trend lines? they NEVER make money almost.
it is a lottery ticket simple as that while you push pump and dumps all the time and you know nothing about that industry.
just because you are a wall street junkie dont tell others that those are great long term plays.
it is a SHORT TERM GAMBLE not an investment call it what it is instead of trying to embellish facts from fiction.
that was what I called you out on from the get go.
so what if it goes up NOW eh? it went right down the toilet right when you told people to buy it.
meaning you could have just as easily scammed people and got out yourself even.
that is generally what pump and dumpers do anyway.
technically and morally speaking you are disingenuous in all regards you can thumbs down and ask your cronies to thumbs down all you want you know I am telling the truth about you banksters and how worthless you are to society.