I never said they cover any and everything, but nice try at putting words in my mouth. While nobody can say with 100% certainty that this is a covered claim (unless you have their insurance policy to review), these are the exact types of claims that D&O policies are meant to cover.....thus it's highly probably that szym will face $0 financial exposure to thsee claims.
you clearly have little to no knowledge of what a D&O policy is intended for or how it reacts. Would not be surprised if you're googling to figure out what D&O insurance even is.
highly suspicious that these class action claims are just now trickling in and all at once. These suits would've made much more sense earlier in the year not long after JW announced the change of direction and the stock plummeted. Potential future equity raise is a legitimate concern but I think we head higher from here and this is a manipulation effort. Speculation of course but I've seen these games played before. BOL.
while glassdoor can maybe shed a little light into employee morale....the very limited number of reviews means we should take them with a grain of salt. I have personally only left a review on glassdoor when I didn't like my employer. I assume most others are the same in that you're much more likely to leave a review if you really dislike an employer than if you really enjoyed working with an employer.
that's because anytime there's a decent stock drop...lawfirm come out of the woodwork looking for securities claims. There are legitimate scenarios for securities claims and then there are the leeches who bring securities suits everytime a stock has sizable drops. Very bizarre that they are bringing the suits now as opposed to when JW said they were compeltely re-hauling their strategy and the stock was in the 2's. This may be a buying opp if anything as something fishy behind the scenes appears to be going on.
correct as long as they don't exhaust their insurance limit (whatever it is)...although I would think they have more than enough coverage for something like this.
insurance will provide coverage regardless if it's duty or non-duty to defend. Insurance still provides the coverage it's just a matter of whether solazyme will chose the defense or the insurance company will.
oddly enough I'm actually with you. I wanted to add more in upper $2's but it never got back down there. I then sold half my position in upper $3's waiting for a pullback to the mid $3's before adding. It's not often that I actually want to see a stock I own go down but I'm still hoping for a little more pullback so I can re-enter with my other half and gain some shares.
Oh I forgot to add. You never actually addressed how you "know" Roquette is selling. Once again all you do is provide your opinion as fact and claim everyone else is an idiot. Good day troll and please short this stock if you are so sure in your beliefs.
Hahahahaha I really got to u. I do love how you take your opinion and relay it a verifiable fact. Carry on troll.