Sat, Sep 20, 2014, 1:27 PM EDT - U.S. Markets closed

Recent

% | $
Quotes you view appear here for quick access.

Isis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Message Board

scomasea 7 posts  |  Last Activity: 2 hours 8 minutes ago Member since: Jan 18, 2002
SortNewest  |  Oldest  |  Highest Rated Expand all messages
  • scomasea scomasea 2 hours 8 minutes ago Flag

    scammer = spammer

  • scomasea scomasea 2 hours 8 minutes ago Flag

    post it here unless u r a scammer

  • Reply to

    Zacks Price Target

    by ezirish Sep 4, 2014 8:40 AM
    scomasea scomasea Sep 9, 2014 12:43 PM Flag

    agree,only upside past .10 and that is stretching would be if edwards life science comes to the rescue as a partner or another large company but if i was edward's i would buyout plc at .10 and make clear so plc had to accept unless plc lender gives in to lend more money………….never made sense hind site that plc made this agreement w/the lender to begin w/sounds fishy imo. and w/the small loan amount's u would think plc would have only made the deal if the amount was much greater at 1st to see plc thru and beyond fda trial's

  • this whole scenario smell's fishy

  • Reply to

    end of june sec filing

    by scomasea Jul 6, 2014 12:32 PM
    scomasea scomasea Jul 21, 2014 11:41 AM Flag

    plcsf debt holder is basically getting renal guard for free and the money that was lended paid for renal guard fda trial's and to pay plc board members up there salary's and other cost………………….like to know if any of plc board members knew the lean holder of plc debt………………..i hope the security exchange commission check this all out and to see what they think

  • Reply to

    end of june sec filing

    by scomasea Jul 6, 2014 12:32 PM
    scomasea scomasea Jul 6, 2014 7:44 PM Flag

    let's hope edward's life science's come to the rescue and buy's out plc

  • in that sec filing,plc board members unanimously agree that plc share holders to vote yes to everything but also said the board members may have a conflict of interest with shareholders which may not be in the best interest of current plc shareholder's.imo. and i think once plc changes it's name shareholders can no longer sue a company that does not exist especially if i voted yes to everything plc imo. would just say i agree w/the name change and voted yes to everything,i am holding out for a possible class action suit or a turn around that plc abandoned this proxy vote and the lien holders of plc debt decide to lend plc more money…………..imo. plc should have not reassume fda trial's until they found a company to be partner of plc fda renal guard trials and pay for the fda trial and become 50% owner of plc or put plc up for sale or find a lender w/better term's imo. plc did not try very hard for any of these things instead did what was in the best interest of the board member's and plc lein holder and imo. plc board members are incompetent to be board member's at best,this is what i allege……………..viveve has had general clearance from the fda for there product for several years now so it can't be generating anything great in term's of rev's or profits imo.

ISIS
42.28+0.40(+0.96%)Sep 19 4:00 PMEDT

Trending Tickers

i
Trending Tickers features significant U.S. stocks showing the most dramatic increase in user interest in Yahoo Finance in the previous hour over historic norms. The list is limited to those equities which trade at least 100,000 shares on an average day and have a market cap of more than $300 million.