Sat, Jul 26, 2014, 6:24 AM EDT - U.S. Markets closed


% | $
Click the to save as a favorite.

Isis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Message Board

scomasea 17 posts  |  Last Activity: Jul 21, 2014 11:41 AM Member since: Jan 18, 2002
SortNewest  |  Oldest  |  Highest Rated Expand all messages
  • that is my prediction along w/a nice spike in price percentage wise

  • scomasea scomasea May 8, 2014 10:40 AM Flag

    i based my prediction that plc will have fluctuated quarter's,last quarter showed that stocking order's for kit's showed but imo. this 1st quarter report will show restocking,also plc is showing it is burning less cash and let's hope console sale's are up and that would be butter on the bread but bread is good enough

  • plc showed last quarter less restocking of kit's which will fluctuate along w/console sale's quarter to quarter,stand's to reason cash burn will improve this 1st quarter and kit and console sale's will improve,restocking !!!!!!! best quarter is coming for renal guard this 1st quarter,small profit ? $100k ? or more is due able

  • scomasea scomasea May 15, 2014 1:49 PM Flag

    ceo said he was a car sales thing,he used this skilled he said,i was just before knowing this but he then said he was,also a board me member excused himself when refinancing ? why was it his friend's.they don't even say what the new shares would be worth ? if you ask me plc ceo is a #$%$,he kept hyping plc heart laser and then plc said is was found not to be effected,they should be sued for all there salaries and then somebecause imo. they stole renal guard from share holders,rich takers always justify them self's but in the end they will pay more than they stole imo.

  • Reply to

    Dear Mark T.

    by i_hate_hillsamuel May 16, 2014 11:33 AM
    scomasea scomasea May 16, 2014 12:30 PM Flag

    don't think he care's,he's collected big pay checks and returned nothing to shareholders……………he will keep getting paid…………and i would not be surprised everyone involved in plc accept for shareholders and imo. i think one can allege it's possible this whole financing deal was all created by insiders and financier's to basically tale renal guard from shareholders for $6 million dollars for what the ceo said has a potential of $500 million dollars,renal guard will succeed imo. but shareholders will receive nothing for renal guard promising future…………….imo. SEC investigation should be encourage by Us

  • scomasea by scomasea May 19, 2014 12:35 PM Flag

    not saying it is so or not but one should ponder plc board member or board members was and is to close to plc finanaciar's and even one board member excused himself from the lenders deal,think it's possible that plc board member's was calculating this whole scenario fiasco from the the start to see how renal guard fared then stalled recent quarter report of renal guard kit sales to next quarter or next,just to steal renal guard from shareholders ? after all plc sold 2 or 3 console's last quarter report and there are plenty of console's out there.they need to replenish kits for these existing consoles but imo. plc deferred it to next quarter or next just for this sharade………………plc board members never of have been paid more than 50k a year from what they produced in revenues and if they did only receive 50k per year and less to board member's plc would have more money but instead it's imo. it's in the pocket's of plc board member's…………….plc ceo dis say say he was a car sale person and use this skill as ceo and imo. he made money and sold lemons to us small shareholders……………………king leapold of belgium lived as a king and when he died of natural causes all he said was the horror's of it all,the unking imo. was reflecting on what he did to others to become king,for one he cut the hands of slaves who did not produce enough in africa in harvesting from the rubber tree plant's,the horrors of it all imo. was what he did to others imo. plc shareholders are being cut off from a good product………….

  • Reply to

    plc sharade ?

    by scomasea May 19, 2014 12:35 PM
    scomasea scomasea May 19, 2014 12:39 PM Flag

    plc name change ? well then you can't have a law suit against a company that does not exist any longer and a name change would mean plc does not exist any longer

  • make's no sense that the financier's just don't buy plc for .10 a share or to just buy renal guard patent's and business for .10 they would need to buy 30 million shares and that would equal $3 million

  • Reply to

    make's no sense that the financier's

    by scomasea May 20, 2014 5:32 PM
    scomasea scomasea May 23, 2014 11:19 AM Flag

    imo. ceo board members are only concern about themselves and fat pay check's,they got paid in access because there paycheck's have exceeded what they produced,they should of never had the structure debt to begin with,they should of at the very least made the financier's 50/50 partner's and the financier's pay for the renal guard fda trial's even if it meant renal guard abroad approved shut down til fda trial's was completed and that the financier's pay til rev's in America kicked in w/the option at anytime for them to just walk a way,the board members of plc are at least moron's unworthy to run a company and guilty of neglacents at the least to out right #$%$'s

  • edwards did hold there 5 million shares

  • scomasea scomasea May 26, 2014 12:53 PM Flag

    well if edwards life science concurs with plc ceo that the potential of $500 million in rev's once approved "renal guard" from the fda i would think edward's would at least pay .10 a share or even maybe .15 or .20 or from approximately from $12.5 to $25 million

  • way to go ceo,year's of selling plc laser and then selling a good product like renal guard to just take it away from shareholders in neglachence loan at best……………………alway's said how much plc laser was but in the end said it was not effected……………..enjoy

  • because then plc no longer exist's

  • Reply to

    make's no sense that the financier's

    by scomasea May 20, 2014 5:32 PM
    scomasea scomasea Jun 2, 2014 4:46 PM Flag

    why ? give us numbers ? give us your insight of viveve ? what doe it do ?

  • in that sec filing,plc board members unanimously agree that plc share holders to vote yes to everything but also said the board members may have a conflict of interest with shareholders which may not be in the best interest of current plc shareholder's.imo. and i think once plc changes it's name shareholders can no longer sue a company that does not exist especially if i voted yes to everything plc imo. would just say i agree w/the name change and voted yes to everything,i am holding out for a possible class action suit or a turn around that plc abandoned this proxy vote and the lien holders of plc debt decide to lend plc more money…………..imo. plc should have not reassume fda trial's until they found a company to be partner of plc fda renal guard trials and pay for the fda trial and become 50% owner of plc or put plc up for sale or find a lender w/better term's imo. plc did not try very hard for any of these things instead did what was in the best interest of the board member's and plc lein holder and imo. plc board members are incompetent to be board member's at best,this is what i allege……………..viveve has had general clearance from the fda for there product for several years now so it can't be generating anything great in term's of rev's or profits imo.

  • Reply to

    end of june sec filing

    by scomasea Jul 6, 2014 12:32 PM
    scomasea scomasea Jul 6, 2014 7:44 PM Flag

    let's hope edward's life science's come to the rescue and buy's out plc

  • Reply to

    end of june sec filing

    by scomasea Jul 6, 2014 12:32 PM
    scomasea scomasea Jul 21, 2014 11:41 AM Flag

    plcsf debt holder is basically getting renal guard for free and the money that was lended paid for renal guard fda trial's and to pay plc board members up there salary's and other cost………………….like to know if any of plc board members knew the lean holder of plc debt………………..i hope the security exchange commission check this all out and to see what they think

30.14-0.48(-1.57%)Jul 25 4:00 PMEDT

Trending Tickers

Trending Tickers features significant U.S. stocks showing the most dramatic increase in user interest in Yahoo Finance in the previous hour over historic norms. The list is limited to those equities which trade at least 100,000 shares on an average day and have a market cap of more than $300 million.