gotta put those clowns on ignore. ive put half this board on ignore. so refreshing to see only 11 posts when i tune in to sniff out any news.
do you know if he is long or short or by what name (on YMB) he might go by?
Why would Mayo feel the need to fall in line with estimated JNJ timeline? Seems to me, they would leave the date as is and only move it up if JNJ announces approval and release of drug. Who knows if JNJ trials get delayed, FDA moves slower than expected, etc. I have to think they changed their trial for some other reason than as a tip of the hat to JNJ.
yeah...i posited something like that -- acquisition talk being posturing more than anything -- a month or two ago, so yeah, i agree with you.
and yes, need to get imetelstat approved.
...(before being bought out)?
i mean, why else would they be uncertain if there wasn't a timeline involved. because otherwise, if they were to remain independent, they could be looking forever and no reason to express uncertainty.
check out fishermangent's imetelstat dot eu site. there is a long post about it
This guy should definitely be put on ignore. basher with nothing constructive to offer. going on my ignore list now.
how do you know there was only one patient? ive read blogs and mpn forums that included more than one patient who had liver toxicity problems. other trials as well. im not saying its a deal breaker -- with proper dosings that risk is mitigated -- but one shouldnt be blase about the risks, either.
dont let them get under your skin. its not your responsibility to school them. let the market do it. then again, im all in and think there is zero chance GERN doesnt pay off like a Vegas slot machine.
just put them on ignore. there are a handful of pumpers, an army of shorts, and a couple of folks who have interesting posts. really cuts down on the riff raff if you ignore folks like joko, larry, main, kpail, etc.
...probably should put me on ignore as well. although long, i dont have a science background and am here mainly to seek clarification on things.