Here is half the article related to climate change and the park:
“Glaciers are essentially a reservoir of water held back for decades, and they’re releasing that water in August when it’s hot, and streams otherwise might have low flows or no flows,” Daniel B. Fagre, a United States Geological Survey research ecologist, said in an interview. “As glaciers disappear, there will be a reduction in the water at the same time that demand is going up. I think we’re on the cusp of bigger changes.”
But shrinking glaciers are only the visible symptom of much broader and more serious changes. “We’re a snow-driven ecosystem, and glaciers are just a part of that,” Dr. Fagre said. “The way the snow goes is the way our ecosystem goes.”
Lately, the snows are not going well.
Mountain snowpacks are shrinking. In recent decades, rising winter temperatures have increasingly changed snows to rain. Rising spring temperatures are melting the remaining snow faster.
Continue reading the main story
“Imagine turning on your faucet in your sink and all your water runs out in an hour’s time,” Thomas Painter, a research scientist and snow hydrologic expert at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory, said in an interview. “Loss of snowpack earlier in the year compresses runoff into a shorter period of time.”
Glaciers and year-round snowfields — accumulations of snow in colder locations, like shadowed mountainsides, that never fully melt — pick up the slack in summer. But they, too, are vanishing: In Glacier National Park, the number of days above 90 degrees has tripled since early last century, and the summertime span in which such hot days occur has almost doubled, to include all of July and most of August.
Winters are warmer, too: A century ago, the last brutally cold day typically occurred around March 5. By last decade, it had receded to Feb. 15.
Dr. Fagre, the park’s resident expert on snowpacks, glaciers and climate change, can see the changes firsthand. Grinnell Glacier, one of the park’s most studied ice sheets, feeds a frigid lake on the flanks of Mount Gould, more than 6,000 feet above sea level. “At the beginning, we had a 25-foot-high wall of ice that we were actually concerned about from a safety standpoint,” he said. “And now the entire glacier simply slopes into the water, with no wall of ice whatsoever.
“All of that has melted just within the last 10 years.”
At Clements Mountain, with a summit some 8,800 feet above sea level, what used to be a glacier is now a shrinking snowfield surrounded by 30- and 40-foot heaps of moraine, stones piled up by the ice as it pushed its way forward. One recent fall day, freshets of melted snow tumbled over rock ledges and down hills, past stands of Rocky Mountain firs.
But that will change.
“This snowfield will vanish,” Dr. Fagre said. “When that happens, this whole area will dry up a lot. A lot of these alpine gardens, so to speak, are sustained entirely by waterfalls and streams like this. And once this goes, then some of those plants will disappear.”
For wildlife, Dr. Fagre said, the implications are almost too great to count. Frigid alpine streams may dry up, and cold-water fish and insects may grow scarce. Snowfall may decline, and fewer avalanches may open up clearings for wildlife or push felled trees into streams, creating trout habitats. Tree lines may creep up mountains, erasing open meadows that enable mountain goats to keep watch against mountain lions. A hummingbird that depends on glacial lilies for nectar may arrive in spring to find that the lilies have already blossomed.
Trekking across what is left of the Clements snowfield, Dr. Fagre unexpectedly encountered a long-clawed paw print: from one of perhaps 300 wolverines said to remain in the lower 48 states. These solitary, ferocious animals have come back after trappers nearly eliminated them decades ago, but conservationists and federal wildlife experts are sharply at odds over whether rising temperatures imperil them.
Continue reading the main storyContinue reading the main storyContinue reading the main story
“Wolverines need deep snows to build their winter dens,” Dr. Fagre said. “I’m not sure what’s going to happen to them.”
For people, the future is somewhat clearer.
Rising temperatures and early snowmelt make for warmer, drier summers as rivers shrink and soils dry out. That is already driving a steady increase in wildfires, including in the park, and disease and pest infestations in forests.
But in the long term, the ramifications are more ominous than a mere rise in fires or dying trees.
Moisture loss from early snowmelt is worsening a record hydrological drought on the Colorado River, which supplies water to about 40 million people from the Rockies to California and Mexico; by 2050, scientists estimate, the Colorado’s flow could drop by 10 percent to 30 percent.
In the usually arid West, where reservoirs are vital, earlier and bigger snowmelt will disrupt the task of balancing water demand and supply. Experts anticipate an increase in disputes over water rights as a growing population competes for a shrinking resource. And farming, a major industry across much of the Rockies, will become even more of a gamble than fickle weather makes it.
Indeed, complications have already surfaced. Dennis Iverson runs a 140-head cow-and-calf operation on several thousand acres about 25 miles northeast of Missoula, Mont. Five hundred acres are hayfield, irrigated with water from the Blackfoot River about one and a half miles away.
Twenty years ago, the water flowed through an open ditch, and from the time the irrigation pumps were started on May 20, “we were able to irrigate the whole ranch,” he said. “There was always enough water, even to do some irrigating in July and August.”
Now, Mr. Iverson starts the pumps on May 10, because a hotter spring has already dried out his pasture. The open irrigation ditch has been converted into an 8,000-foot underground pipe to prevent evaporation. “If we hadn’t done that, we wouldn’t even be getting water to the ranch,” he said. “There’s that much less water in the stream than there was 20 years ago.”
Teddy Roosevelt plus Scarface plus Navy Seals, Jungle Seals and MiB's couldn't barely put a dent in these coke infested jungles.
The destruction of the rainforest is in the gun sights of the greenies. If union organizers were murdered, bribes paid, and they undercut ANR on coal bids to US utilities, and Goldman owned the operation and shorted ANR, it looks like organized crime. What do you think ?
And Goldman shorted anr. But bribery may be involved. Say some coal guys.
The USA grid in danger. Need fuel cells to power essential infrastructure, not rely on grid. Bloom boxes needed.
Deleted by yahoo. Conspiracy theory: Goldman Psychs sells coal to Florida utilities cheap to undercut alpha and bolster short position in ANR. Conspiracy theorists welcome comments. Bag holders comments welcome.
It shows not zee UFO's flying out of Antarctica on YouTube. Defeated the us navy.
It needs repair. Don't forget to watch the Admiral Byrd defeat in Antarctica by #$%$ UFO's on YouTube in Russian subtitles.
The Russians made a good documentary with subtitles of the American defeat at Antarctica in 1947 by #$%$ UFO's. Check it out on YouTube.
I have inverters. Fuel cells and inverters are 2 different animals, Tesla. Apples and oranges.
They can build a refinery in Canada if they can build them next to the Jersey Turnpike. The pipeline has a lot of opposition, and if the quakes continue in frack land, the pipe could crack up and spill. They will tear things up building the pipeline. Cars run on fuel cells cleaner and without gasoline. Just ask Toyota about the new 2016 fuel cell car with tax credits. They won't build a refinery in Canada because fossil fuels are doomed like pay phone booths.
No doubt the new 2016 fuel cell car will power a house. It has no relation to the truck stop inverter you own,
It's about time for ANR to go up. Maybe you could have a beer and celebrate.
Since natural gas shot up, that's a plus for coal. The utilities can switch over if need be. ( I think.). Could also be options expiry games.