Recent

% | $
Quotes you view appear here for quick access.

T-Mobile US, Inc. Message Board

sempai_gojy_ryu 981 posts  |  Last Activity: May 19, 2015 11:41 AM Member since: Oct 28, 2009
SortNewest  |  Oldest  |  Highest Rated Expand all messages
  • Reply to

    ENDO the End O' IGXT???

    by pdag20 May 19, 2015 11:09 AM
    sempai_gojy_ryu sempai_gojy_ryu May 19, 2015 11:41 AM Flag

    Sorry Pdag, but I don't think legal partnership agreements will be easily thrown to the curb due to a buyout. Endo will take ownership of the asset/agreement. There will be legal language in the contract that will hold Endo to the same parameters as before.

  • Reply to

    Has anyone talked to management regarding par/endo?

    by igxtnow May 18, 2015 4:38 PM
    sempai_gojy_ryu sempai_gojy_ryu May 18, 2015 5:11 PM Flag

    As tightlipped as Horst was (due to legal documents), I'd be surprised if IGXT's backside isn't protected in the same legal document, in the case of buyouts, ect...

  • sempai_gojy_ryu by sempai_gojy_ryu May 15, 2015 12:53 PM Flag

    We got confirmation of numbers, but it appears it will take the pipeline dropping more products to move price northward. What are the estimates of time for approval of the next two products?
    THanks,

  • Reply to

    Glum/Ryu

    by commonsenseareus Apr 21, 2015 7:05 PM
    sempai_gojy_ryu sempai_gojy_ryu Apr 22, 2015 9:47 AM Flag

    Commonsense,
    I'm not a Glm clone. I'm well invested in IGXT, and am waiting out the eventual return. In the past, I've been burned by small companies not properly representing themselves. My warning flags start flying when the CEO starts letting out information to certain parties, and not making it public discourse for all. I went to the website for Singular Research to listen for the conference call and couldn't find it. Participant42 said he heard the the conference call also. If it was for all the public to hear, then I won't be as upset. But there should have been a PR released stating such. If it wasn't privied to the public, then there were some SEC violations going on. I will happily stand down if I just couldn't locate the link. Wouldn't be the first time.

  • Reply to

    GLMCOM

    by sempai_gojy_ryu Apr 21, 2015 3:45 PM
    sempai_gojy_ryu sempai_gojy_ryu Apr 21, 2015 4:15 PM Flag

    Nor the SEC.

    Congress Created the SEC
    When the stock market crashed in October 1929, so did public confidence in the U.S. markets. Congress held hearings to identify the problems and search for solutions. Based on its findings, Congress – in the peak year of the Depression – passed the Securities Act of 1933. The following year, it passed the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, which created the SEC.
    The main purposes of these laws can be reduced to two common-sense notions:
    Companies offering securities for sale to the public must tell the truth about their business, the securities they are selling, and the risks involved in investing in those securities.
    Those who sell and trade securities – brokers, dealers, and exchanges – must treat investors fairly and honestly.

  • Reply to

    GLMCOM

    by sempai_gojy_ryu Apr 21, 2015 3:45 PM
    sempai_gojy_ryu sempai_gojy_ryu Apr 21, 2015 4:07 PM Flag

    Obviously, Participant42 was privied to this "private" information that was not afforded to me and my investment. This is pure horse#$%$! Horst and Par better make a public announcement soon, or suffer the consequences of the SEC.

    Quoting Participant42 (which indicates he was in on the call), "glm, at the time of his post, Patrick didn't know it was supposed to be confidential, but when at the end of the presentation, when Patrick asked if he heard that percentage correctly, Horst, said, while he would not contradict his earlier words ( of perhaps 3o min before), he wouldn't reiterate nor confirm them, as he realized it was supposed to be probably confidential. So, Patrick is innocent in this regard. Your comments about Horst, however, I'm not challenging."

  • sempai_gojy_ryu by sempai_gojy_ryu Apr 21, 2015 3:45 PM Flag

    Thus the reason we "little" investors don't stand a chance. Pure BS, I saw the post also. If it is true, some people are given information that others aren't. Patrick's mistake was posting it, he wasn't trying anything unscrupulous with the information. But what about those allowed to listen to the private call?

    Patrick, why did you take down your post that IGXT gets 30% for the Par partnered drug Suboxone, you reported from the Singular conference. If Horst told large investors at a conference and doesn't do a press release to all investors to see, he would be violating SEC rules. Horst has stated many, many times the details to Par deals is confidential, so he also broke that agreement too. This is what he has done in the past, get excited a say things he shouldn't or not say things he should. One big example is two years ago at the Roth conference he got excited and said they had a $3M offer for exclusivity to negotiate for the ED drug and nothing came of it. He said other things to that never materialized. He should not be let out in public. He and Ingrid sold 500K shares just before the CRL for migraine and they had to know it was coming, if not already in hand. Then they sell 60K shares before earnings call, which very well be another loss for the 1st Qtr.. Ethical or just not very bright? That goes for you for posting confidential information as well.

  • sempai_gojy_ryu sempai_gojy_ryu Mar 9, 2015 9:29 AM Flag

    Has IGXT officially announced their earnings date?

  • Reply to

    Let's get through this .88 resistance.

    by sempai_gojy_ryu Mar 3, 2015 11:30 AM
    sempai_gojy_ryu sempai_gojy_ryu Mar 4, 2015 1:53 PM Flag

    Built a little support at .82. Now let's bust through the .88 resistance to .95!

  • sempai_gojy_ryu by sempai_gojy_ryu Mar 3, 2015 11:30 AM Flag

    Next stop .95. EOM

  • Reply to

    "Better cover Shortie, we are going MUCH HIGHER!"

    by marketcap Mar 2, 2015 12:11 PM
    sempai_gojy_ryu sempai_gojy_ryu Mar 2, 2015 1:56 PM Flag

    So I don't get in trouble, my "rumored" $17.50/share buyout was purely pulled out of the air.

  • Reply to

    BETTER GET IN!! GOING TO $4 OR $5

    by marketcap Mar 2, 2015 9:55 AM
    sempai_gojy_ryu sempai_gojy_ryu Mar 2, 2015 12:45 PM Flag

    The rumor I just heard was $17.52/share....

  • Reply to

    MACD

    by townguy413 Mar 2, 2015 8:42 AM
    sempai_gojy_ryu sempai_gojy_ryu Mar 2, 2015 10:22 AM Flag

    I'll just be happy when we quit selling for fractions of a cent.......

  • Reply to

    WOW real volume early

    by noochie44 Feb 23, 2015 9:39 AM
    sempai_gojy_ryu sempai_gojy_ryu Feb 23, 2015 11:07 AM Flag

    noochie,
    I'm assuming your knowledgable with charts. How much volume will it take to get thru the resistance of the .70s

  • sempai_gojy_ryu sempai_gojy_ryu Dec 3, 2014 11:00 AM Flag

    That is the problem, IGXT might as well said they are receiving between $1,000,000 & $1,999,999 sometime in the future. I don't follow the thought process that the legalities of the agreements allow you to state you are to receive a 7 figure payment, but not get any closer to the actual numbers.

  • sempai_gojy_ryu by sempai_gojy_ryu Dec 2, 2014 2:50 PM Flag

    Realstat,

    I figured you're the most likely to answer this. So here goes. First, he is my divulgence.
    I flipped this stock on a quick sale from .60 to the .90 per share range, last time the shares appreciated to a $1. I bought back at .78/share on it's current death spiral to .35/share. I got 20,000 shares. I got a few questions for you. What am I leaving out on the actual revenue generating products, not in the pipeline - future stuff. I'm trying to grasp a revised earnings per share with regards to the new data coming in. IMO, the stock was priced as a speculative play. Now it has some positive statistical facts, it can now be viewed as something other than speculation.

    1. Wasn't IGXT forecasting $1 million in sales for Fortfivo per year, and they just got $1 million last month, and they said it was still growing.
    2. They just announced at least $1 million milestone payment from Edgemont, boosting Cash by 25%
    3. Tomorrow they will go over new deal with Wockhardt. Possibility of another payment.
    4. Am I missing anything else.

  • sempai_gojy_ryu by sempai_gojy_ryu Nov 25, 2014 12:31 PM Flag

    Is the trading halt due to IGXT announcing a settlement, but not providing any details? Seems like the stock would be ripe for "insider" information being used on this settlement news. The TSE decided to hault the trading until more information is made available.

  • Reply to

    Speculation

    by sempai_gojy_ryu Nov 13, 2013 3:03 PM
    sempai_gojy_ryu sempai_gojy_ryu Nov 18, 2013 9:29 AM Flag

    TMUS is raising $2 billion more by selling notes. They are now planning to raise $4 billion in additional capital for spectrum purchases from a "private" source.

  • Reply to

    Speculation

    by sempai_gojy_ryu Nov 13, 2013 3:03 PM
    sempai_gojy_ryu sempai_gojy_ryu Nov 14, 2013 11:30 AM Flag

    Ghetopcs on the Tmus board believes the $2 billion raised in the second offering has something to do with Dish's $2.2 bid for Lightsquared's spectrum

  • Reply to

    Speculation

    by sempai_gojy_ryu Nov 13, 2013 3:03 PM
    sempai_gojy_ryu sempai_gojy_ryu Nov 14, 2013 11:27 AM Flag

    Do you think TMUS might be interested in purchasing USM? They are raising $2 billion in a second offering for spectrum. I don't know who has $2 billion in spectrum to sale to Tmus in a clean deal, other than USM. I don't think S would work a deal with Tmus to sell spectrum when they are in the M&A dance with each other. Dish is the same. At&T and Verizon would be the other two. But with the rate S has been losing customers, and Tmus is gaining subs, Tmus could shortly move into 3rd place in the USA market with a purchase of USM's 5 million subs.

TMUS
36.50-0.90(-2.41%)Jul 27 4:01 PMEDT