Wed, Mar 4, 2015, 8:59 AM EST - U.S. Markets open in 31 mins.


% | $
Quotes you view appear here for quick access.

Endeavour Silver Corp. Message Board

shiftsuper175607 147 posts  |  Last Activity: 11 hours ago Member since: Oct 26, 2002
SortNewest  |  Oldest  |  Highest Rated Expand all messages
  • shiftsuper175607 shiftsuper175607 11 hours ago Flag


    I don't know what you are trying to do with your post. Evidently you do not have a clue about the oil drilling business. @@@@ are your statements.

    @@@@ "One does NOT know the "% completion of the drilling rig" ~"

    What the heck is that about? Once a rig starts completes a well to the point it is declared a dry hole or they hit oil of a production quantity. This takes a few weeks at most.

    I don't know if there are any 25,000 foot deep wells...maybe out in the ocean somewhere.

    @@@@What is the current PRODUCTION flow rate of the well? 0%, 25%, 50%, or 100%

    Again what is this about?
    They do use chokes on some wells to control the pressure, but wells are allowed to flow what they will. The production has a decline rate as the pressure falls off. Different depths have different pressures to force the oil out. Oil reservoir wells have pumps to pump the oil at a steady rate.

    @@@@It is very difficult to use rig counts to make any specific conclusion on oil production ... WHEN and HOW MUCH.

    This is not true. A driller knows very well what a well may do if the area has been derisked by drilling all around. You can verify that by how many rigs are drilling in an area. They drill where they expect the best production. They know how many wells they can drill with a rig in a year and report this in there capital spending plans.

  • Reply to

    PGH dividend

    by oilersbeats Mar 2, 2015 4:22 PM
    shiftsuper175607 shiftsuper175607 Mar 2, 2015 4:26 PM Flag

    not enough information. the price of the oil is needed.

  • Reply to


    by tradefordollars Mar 1, 2015 1:53 PM
    shiftsuper175607 shiftsuper175607 Mar 2, 2015 8:34 AM Flag

    It is not the is the personnel. The longer the time that passes the workers find other work. You can take experienced workers off of working rigs and hire new workers to get an idled rig going again. You have safety training and learning how to do everything.

    The rig just drills the does not put it in production. That comes after completion (fracking) and hookup to piping or a tank battery.

  • shiftsuper175607 shiftsuper175607 Mar 1, 2015 10:19 PM Flag

    They have pretty good hedging for 2016 also.

  • shiftsuper175607 shiftsuper175607 Feb 27, 2015 3:59 PM Flag

    That is how I based my reply to you (pasted below) on February 6th ?
    I was counting wells drilled each month and accumulating for the year.

    Good point...the production falls faster as time passes.

    Probably closer to 500,000 bbl/day for 100 rigs
    So, 500 rigs would be 2 and 1/2 million barrels in a year
    One former CEO ( I think Exxon) said production could fall by 5 million barrels in the US after one year.
    It is not just that the new wells are producing they are also replacing the declining production of the old wells. The fracked wells from the last 5 years are the biggest decliners. So, you have many wells the lost production not drilled.

  • shiftsuper175607 shiftsuper175607 Feb 27, 2015 1:13 PM Flag

    Lindberg is really about twice that production(and growing). That was just the Last week in February numbers of production for one the new well pads.

  • Reply to

    PGH is the Find of the Century?

    by danielle0855 Feb 26, 2015 3:57 PM
    shiftsuper175607 shiftsuper175607 Feb 27, 2015 9:34 AM Flag

    Your thread title says "PGH is the Find of the Century?"

    Yet, nothing about that in the body of your message.

    What do you mean by that? In one way you are making a the wording of it...and another it is a question...more a challenge.

  • shiftsuper175607 shiftsuper175607 Feb 27, 2015 9:11 AM Flag

    You said last year...
    i live in california and my cousin works with the governors office in the building division. he told me something that the bashers wont like."

    I guess you can tell us now what it was, since TMEN has closed up.
    It wasn't a lie was it?
    That should be very interesting to hear.

  • Reply to

    I guess Zack was embarrassed

    by brmi12345 Feb 26, 2015 8:41 PM
    shiftsuper175607 shiftsuper175607 Feb 26, 2015 10:08 PM Flag

    I think he was part of the e-mail group with investorchicago_66_upa.

    The grapevine group, I think they called it

    He probably contacted zack_henry42 and told him to remove that post.

  • Reply to

    I guess Zack was embarrassed

    by brmi12345 Feb 26, 2015 8:41 PM
    shiftsuper175607 shiftsuper175607 Feb 26, 2015 9:14 PM Flag

    He said something about Mr. Landegger leaving the company and that Thermoenergy is finished and his 200,000 shares are worthless.

    Is that right?

  • Reply to

    zack_henry42 would rather fight than switch

    by shiftsuper175607 Feb 26, 2015 12:18 PM
    shiftsuper175607 shiftsuper175607 Feb 26, 2015 12:51 PM Flag

    Well, at least you finally admit that I did know it all.
    Is it bad to have someone on a message board who knows the techs and states it?
    Would you rather just have ignorance and bias?
    I have power plant and water treatment experience...a lot of it...and I have no angst against this company. At first I thought it would be a possible investment, but it had too many failures and weaknesses.
    You should have listened to me. I could have saved you tens of thousands of dollars on your 200,000 shares. Lord knows I tried. I told you about the Oxy system pressure problem and that the techs for the water were not suitable for fracking. I HAVE known it all for years, and tried to tell everyone. Not up in your face, but logically and educationally. I even showed on this board where the CEO and Chief engineer said the techs were not needed in their own words on the conference call and in one of the publications.

    Odd that you are mad at me for trying to warn you.

    The time was not wasted if someone did not invest or sold before this final collapse.

    "probably" done does not sound like acceptance.

  • shiftsuper175607 by shiftsuper175607 Feb 26, 2015 12:18 PM Flag

    He started a thread, I reply, also another...he would rather argue than discuss the stock and company.
    I replied with questions and respect.

    It seems it is that way with everyone here.
    He then grips about the other poster making stuff up and THEN makes up stuff about the other poster...totally irony on this board.

    TMEN should change it's name to SOAP

    for soap opera.

  • Reply to

    Anyone expect filings within the next 4-6 weeks?

    by frogger64 Jan 7, 2015 10:58 PM
    shiftsuper175607 shiftsuper175607 Feb 25, 2015 1:19 PM Flag

    I am not sure what you mean by "material non-public information"
    The information was posted by three different people on this message board.
    Any one in that area can drive by and look in the windows or knock on the door.

    Anyone can call and see if the phone gives a busy signal.

    If no one is there any more...who would put out the PR?
    If there is no money for anything...who would pay the costs?

    It can be confirmed or disproved if you drive to the headquarters or call the phone number.

  • Reply to

    Anyone expect filings within the next 4-6 weeks?

    by frogger64 Jan 7, 2015 10:58 PM
    shiftsuper175607 shiftsuper175607 Feb 24, 2015 9:53 PM Flag

    The 6 weeks have past and there has been nothing from the company.
    The latest report is that the phone only returns a busy signal and a look through the headquarters windows shows disarray.
    Indications is that their money became exhaust and all personnel have left.

    I hope you were not deeply invested here.

  • Reply to

    20% Differential Between Brent & WTI

    by doc.reality Feb 24, 2015 1:41 PM
    shiftsuper175607 shiftsuper175607 Feb 24, 2015 2:28 PM Flag

    I live in WT. It wasn't that long ago there were take away restraints because of increasing production. A few pipelines came on line to help. They were hauling out oil in RR cars also.
    Production is probably a little higher now. It has not peaked yet.
    The differential will need to be great enough to haul it by rail again. IMO
    I have not seen that. Nearly all sand cars at this time.

  • Reply to

    Sold all my EXK, had buyers remorse

    by gotsilverrrr Feb 19, 2015 4:06 PM
    shiftsuper175607 shiftsuper175607 Feb 19, 2015 9:38 PM Flag

    You already sold on the 9th, 10th, and 11th
    Check your posting history.

  • Reply to

    13 G filing yesterday

    by shiftsuper175607 Feb 18, 2015 8:30 AM
    shiftsuper175607 shiftsuper175607 Feb 19, 2015 3:26 PM Flag

    Should say... defaulted loans are growing at 18%/year

  • Reply to

    13 G filing yesterday

    by shiftsuper175607 Feb 18, 2015 8:30 AM
    shiftsuper175607 shiftsuper175607 Feb 19, 2015 3:21 PM Flag

    I have a different opinion about this particular filing.
    It was just a filing for tax purposes and if you look at the filings they did the same thing on 2-13-2014, a year ago... and two years ago on 2-14-2013
    This is the 3rd year in a row at the same time of the year. I would call it "tax time" IMO
    This is the 7th amendment filed and the names and amounts of shares has changed with different amendments.
    On 5-10-12 there is a filing by Security Investors that is the same owners as this.

    It does seem thought that this company is out of business. They were never able to go long with out infused funds from stock sales...after that dried up they received the 4 million loan and the $240,000 loan. That last amount is not enough to do anything and showed that the commitment/enthusiasm by the financiers had ended. I say this because no contracts were announced within any of this time frame. Who would loan money with no hope of return? No one....It is over.
    The fact that these defaulted loans are growing at 18%/month is building a mountain of debt that can not be overcome. There are no assets or underlying technologies to sell of any value. They have no value because they have not generated any contracts or sales. That is the sad fact.
    Sorry for the loss of investment of stockholders here.

    My opinions based on what I have seen and read and my experience.

  • shiftsuper175607 by shiftsuper175607 Feb 18, 2015 8:30 AM Flag

    Seems to be a filing by a major stockholder stating ownership above 5% and not from the company itself.

  • Reply to

    Warren Buffet dumped entire Exxon stake...

    by qqqlqinvestor Feb 18, 2015 12:25 AM
    shiftsuper175607 shiftsuper175607 Feb 18, 2015 8:12 AM Flag

    That is just part of the story. He added shares of a couple of oil stocks. Either you did not know that, or you are deliberately trying to deceive people. Which is it.

2.20-0.07(-3.08%)Mar 3 4:02 PMEST

Trending Tickers

Trending Tickers features significant U.S. stocks showing the most dramatic increase in user interest in Yahoo Finance in the previous hour over historic norms. The list is limited to those equities which trade at least 100,000 shares on an average day and have a market cap of more than $300 million.
Ambarella, Inc.
NASDAQTue, Mar 3, 2015 4:00 PM EST
Autohome Inc.
NYSETue, Mar 3, 2015 4:01 PM EST
Wayfair Inc.
NYSETue, Mar 3, 2015 4:01 PM EST