Thu, Jan 29, 2015, 3:42 AM EST - U.S. Markets open in 5 hrs 48 mins

Recent

% | $
Quotes you view appear here for quick access.

Energy Transfer Partners, L.P. Message Board

shiftsuper175607 124 posts  |  Last Activity: 10 hours ago Member since: Oct 26, 2002
SortNewest  |  Oldest  |  Highest Rated Expand all messages
  • Reply to

    Just like predicted...

    by minnyfan 13 hours ago
    shiftsuper175607 shiftsuper175607 10 hours ago Flag

    that is what the "ignore" feature is for.
    The board clears up nicely if you use it.

    If you want to read a post, you can without unignoring them by hovering out so the flag pops up and click read post.

  • Reply to

    It would seem to me instead of wanting proof

    by basilllman Jan 25, 2015 9:26 AM
    shiftsuper175607 shiftsuper175607 14 hours ago Flag

    brmi12345 did give the source of his info on one of his earlier posts.
    What difference does it make? you would not believe it as being credible.

    I could post the predictions and info he posted if you would like.

    I went back and checked as he was giving very specific info that was falling into place as being confirmed in the filings.

    I don't know about the latest reports of workers all on unemployment, but it is possible.
    We may never know anything else about this company.
    It can't cost much to put out a PR to briefings or flyonthewall...probably nothing $.

    I would give money...let's take up a collection. I'm in for $20

  • shiftsuper175607 by shiftsuper175607 18 hours ago Flag

    ...as the crude inventories numbers come out today. More build is expected.

  • Reply to

    It would seem to me instead of wanting proof

    by basilllman Jan 25, 2015 9:26 AM
    shiftsuper175607 shiftsuper175607 18 hours ago Flag

    I have thought it odd that he posts the same thing, over and over here. Telling people to go over and ask on the CCTC board. yet, he does not post there. I checked his posting history.
    Why is he posting that on the TMEN board?

    It could only be because of a connection between my_man_cosentino and investorchicago_66_upa.
    They could be the same poster. Strange things on this board.
    Most every poster on here for TMEN, only posts here and says the same things, mostly all defending investorchicago_66_upa, as if he were Jim Jones.

    He never said how he made all that money in CCTC.

    This board is pure soap opera entertainment!

  • Reply to

    It would seem to me instead of wanting proof

    by basilllman Jan 25, 2015 9:26 AM
    shiftsuper175607 shiftsuper175607 Jan 27, 2015 5:25 PM Flag

    investorchicago_66_upa never sounds angry?
    That is hysterical.

    Why do you defend him? What is the connection?

  • Reply to

    the first time I bought

    by helenherron54 Jan 27, 2015 3:27 PM
    shiftsuper175607 shiftsuper175607 Jan 27, 2015 4:04 PM Flag

    Well, If oil doesn't go up...all oil companies will be bankrupt in 10 years.
    It won't be just cut dividends.

  • Reply to

    Strenght of late

    by shiftsuper175607 Jan 15, 2015 6:41 PM
    shiftsuper175607 shiftsuper175607 Jan 27, 2015 3:43 PM Flag

    They had a very good Q3 and Q4 has been their strongest quarter.

    Speculating that some think that SPU has turned the corner on it's drink business and it is growing enough to compensate for the fluctuations of the fruit harvests.

    Maybe they can pull off all the big projects and set up the orchards to supply them.

  • Bladex's Fourth Quarter and Full-Year 2014 Earnings Release will be distributed on Wednesday, February 11, 2015 before the market open and will be available on the Bank's corporate website, along with the webcast presentation.
    ________________________________________

    The conference call will be on Thursday, February 12, 2015 At 10:00 am eastern.

  • Reply to

    very simple way to buy oil stock please read

    by pricepershare Jan 25, 2015 11:05 AM
    shiftsuper175607 shiftsuper175607 Jan 26, 2015 8:15 AM Flag

    Good read... you 100% agree about paragraphs.

    What is the agreement? Not having any?

    Leave out the politics...that's baloney How did Bush and Cheney make money and where is it?

    hahaha

  • Reply to

    PGH Recommendation

    by bananahouse171 Jan 25, 2015 4:32 PM
    shiftsuper175607 shiftsuper175607 Jan 25, 2015 9:18 PM Flag

    Come back and tell us when it gets to $2.40-$2.50
    So Long, see you then. Thanks for the tip.

  • Reply to

    Dividend withholding question

    by cantquitnow Jan 25, 2015 4:29 AM
    shiftsuper175607 shiftsuper175607 Jan 25, 2015 5:17 PM Flag

    I receive the full dividend in my Rollover IRA from BLX. Nothing withheld.

    disclosure: stockholder for over 5 years

  • Reply to

    It would seem to me instead of wanting proof

    by basilllman Jan 25, 2015 9:26 AM
    shiftsuper175607 shiftsuper175607 Jan 25, 2015 3:34 PM Flag

    I know what you mean about being attacked for being honest.
    I don't even call names and attack other posters.

    Basillman is a little girl...a little baby girl?
    How old is she?
    At least she doesn't seem to bother you.

    She sure does bother this message board, and you get the credit for that...even if you felt you were being honest. And you kept going back over there to the CCTC board and stirring the pot.

    It is ironic how much the two companies now have in common. It is fitting that the two message boards are so intertwined.

    You never did tell us how long those frack deals take. Are we still waiting, or did the deals fall through? TMEN is so unlucky, fracking is contracting at an alarming rate. TMEN will need to find a new market.

  • Reply to

    It would seem to me instead of wanting proof

    by basilllman Jan 25, 2015 9:26 AM
    shiftsuper175607 shiftsuper175607 Jan 25, 2015 1:50 PM Flag

    So, what took investorchicago_66_upa over to the CCTC board?
    It sure did bring a bunch of misery to this board in retaliation.
    It seems at this time CCTC has more going for it that TMEN. They are still filing reports and putting out PRs.

    It does look like they are suffering the same fate as TMEN. Not finding any investors willing to fund them any longer.

    Is investorchicago_66_upa something special to you? You show up here every so often and talk about him and his involvement in the CCTC board.

  • shiftsuper175607 shiftsuper175607 Jan 24, 2015 6:10 PM Flag

    They actually are cutting spending $570 million down to $200 million from last year's $770 million

  • Reply to

    frogger did you read the article?

    by basilllman Jan 23, 2015 3:57 PM
    shiftsuper175607 shiftsuper175607 Jan 24, 2015 5:52 PM Flag

    zack_henry42,

    As I said...I asked know_it_all_paul if he could check the corporate headquarters. I did not say I believe it...but think about this...

    It has been three months since you talked to Mr. Landegger. that is 3 months of expenses.

    They took a loan out 8-21-13 for $4 million
    As of 3-31-14 that had $1.3 million left...a burn of $2.7 in 7 months.
    By 6-23-14 They were needing money as shown by the filing saying a loan for $240,000

    Was it that small a loan because it was all they needed or because it was all the loaners would give?
    Since they reduced personnel count...that would make me think it was all that was offered. Not, that they were doing business and making money. is that negative? yes, but all I can do is read between the lines of the filings.

    If they are doing smaller deals who is building them? If someone called wanting something. It takes trips to the business, plans, purchasing, construction, delivery. What is the profit margins of the smaller deals? Give me a guess?

    Again, It has been 7 months since they received the $240,000
    That is about what they were spending in one month.
    How much less is it with reduced headcount?

    It is much easier to believe that the "for rent" sign is up and everyone is gone.
    That is easier to believe than "two deals" as they have not done even one.

    It is not about the poster, but about the company...which is most likely by their history. They have had a "going concern" warning for years.

  • Reply to

    frogger did you read the article?

    by basilllman Jan 23, 2015 3:57 PM
    shiftsuper175607 shiftsuper175607 Jan 24, 2015 1:31 PM Flag

    zack_henry42,
    I appreciate your point of view and opinion.
    As you know, I read all the posts also.
    I am not sure what you are referring to as the poster being wrong in the past. If someone says the business will go bankrupt...that is an opinion that can be wrong.
    But, that is not the same as saying there is a "for rent" sign
    That is a fact or it is a lie.
    I remember him saying that they had reduced headcount and that was confirmed in the filing. That caused me to learn toward believing his posts. It has to do with plausibility also.
    The posts could be wrong. That is why I asked know_it_all_paul what was going on at the company headquarters. He said he lived in Worchester.
    That shows I want proof also.

    How long do you think the $240,000 from June 23rd lasted? Even with a reduced head count.

    Will you tell me how they are staying in business?
    If you say they are getting small contracts... as suggested.

    Who is building them? did they hire back people?
    How are they buying the equipment to build them? credit?
    Who is selling them?

    Explain a scenario of how they are keeping the bills paid and the employees paid.

    That is a fair question because the most believable thing is that they ran out of money and laid off the remaining people.

    Is there any reason to believe they will ever give any information out about the company?

    Seems all there are for TMEN is questions.

    Good luck.

  • Reply to

    frogger did you read the article?

    by basilllman Jan 23, 2015 3:57 PM
    shiftsuper175607 shiftsuper175607 Jan 24, 2015 8:38 AM Flag

    know_it_all_paul,

    What going on at the company headquarters?
    Is anybody there?

    Information posted here is that no one is working any more and the "for rent" sign is up.

    That seems likely as TMEN has always had to have financing and they have had none but a small loan about 7 months ago.

    They stated in their Q1 filing...
    Management and the Company’s Board of Directors continue to evaluate options for funding to continue operations under the Company’s existing structure. To date, efforts to secure financing from new investors have been unsuccessful, and the likelihood that funding will be available from sources outside of those who have provided financing in previous rounds is low.
    ___________________________________

    They are saying that if those currently providing financing refuse to continue, the chance that anyone else will provide money is low.
    The amount of the last financing (TO ME, IMO) showed that that funding source was drying up.
    The "for rent" sign and all workers laid off confirms it, if true.

  • Reply to

    Stock way below 2009 lows

    by grinderepos Jan 23, 2015 10:29 AM
    shiftsuper175607 shiftsuper175607 Jan 23, 2015 1:04 PM Flag

    You have poor reading comprehension. where did I say anything was not factual?
    My point is...PGH just made huge changes in their capital plan and clearly explained what they plan to do to "weather the storm" as they call it.
    You talk about the share price compared to the past drop when the banks collapsed.
    Can you see how limited intellectually your posts are?

    Try to think and challenge people.

    Investing is about the future. PGH laid out their future.
    If you can't sleep with what PGH says and the volatility of oil, sell and buy something else.
    Just because you are dying here, doesn't mean you should bore us to death.

  • Reply to

    Stock way below 2009 lows

    by grinderepos Jan 23, 2015 10:29 AM
    shiftsuper175607 shiftsuper175607 Jan 23, 2015 10:45 AM Flag

    What is your game here? You are here for a reason. I would like to know because you are boring as hell, how many posts today? Surely you realize people know you have a hidden agenda. You can't be that stupid, can you?
    You do realize that?

  • Reply to

    Anyone expect filings within the next 4-6 weeks?

    by frogger64 Jan 7, 2015 10:58 PM
    shiftsuper175607 shiftsuper175607 Jan 22, 2015 9:40 AM Flag

    frogger64,
    Welcome to the TMEN board.
    I have been following and posting here longer than anyone else with this same continuous ID. I have followed TMEN closely and have read every filing, report, PR, presentation etc.
    In their NT filing where they state they will not be filing the Q2, they state the reason as being reduction of workforce. That there are not adequate personnel to collect the information.
    Their most recent filing(Sept 2, 2014) is about financing of $240,000 If you read all the parts of it you will see that the loans could be as much as $500,000, but not to exceed that.
    We don't know if they have had any other money come in. In Q1 they had revenue of $202,000 from the CASTion side of their business. Some of that could repeat.
    It would seem they will not be filing any time soon because...
    1) they said they would not in the NT filing
    2)they don't have the people to collect the data
    3) posters here say they are not doing it to save money
    4) they seem to be very low on money.

    I hope this helps

ETP
59.13-1.25(-2.07%)Jan 28 4:04 PMEST

Trending Tickers

i
Trending Tickers features significant U.S. stocks showing the most dramatic increase in user interest in Yahoo Finance in the previous hour over historic norms. The list is limited to those equities which trade at least 100,000 shares on an average day and have a market cap of more than $300 million.
McDonald's Corp.
NYSEWed, Jan 28, 2015 4:00 PM EST
Exelixis, Inc.
NASDAQWed, Jan 28, 2015 4:00 PM EST