Thu, Jul 31, 2014, 11:25 PM EDT - U.S. Markets closed


% | $
Click the to save as a favorite.

Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. Message Board

simp08801 287 posts  |  Last Activity: 5 hours ago Member since: Apr 10, 2000
SortNewest  |  Oldest  |  Highest Rated Expand all messages
  • simp08801 by simp08801 Jul 15, 2014 12:51 PM Flag

    an immediate buy out at a reasonable price would be the best thing for long holders here

    as should be more evident to all, the attendant risks here are significant

    pass the torch

    sooner the better for long holders


    PS - as a part of the deal, keep the message board open for you know who and all his board names

  • that is the gift that gives for up to 4 trading days after the news

  • simp08801 by simp08801 Jul 11, 2014 8:24 PM Flag

    you said:

    "Simp08801 must be in the inner circle of parents as he suggested something about the boy who broke his leg was one of the poorer performers on this last measure. "

    are you mad because I was too tired last night?

    what about the prior 27 nights?

    you must know, from your electronic encyclopedia, that I never said that


    I never said he was a poor performer

    and if you are worried that I am going to leave you for a dmd mother in the inner circle, you underestimate my adoration of you

  • Reply to


    by jim_himmel Jul 11, 2014 1:02 PM
    simp08801 simp08801 Jul 11, 2014 1:48 PM Flag


    you used the word "simple" in your post without my written permission or payment of the customary usage fee

    if I see you do it again, ever, I will sue your sorry #$%$

    this is both a warning and a threat

  • simp08801 simp08801 Jul 11, 2014 1:45 PM Flag


    we never learn

    we are retail!

    I sold 95% of my position on the secondary announcement, as it thought it was tooooo soon after the FDA announcement and would cap the stock (as it did and then some)

    I then bought it all back in the 27s thru 29s

    did not sell any that I bought back, contrary to popular belief (apparently star/zoooey/thig must have misread my accounts when they hacked into them!)

    I figured since nobody else took my advice why should I ?!

    I lost approximately 8 college educations on paper yesterday (probably more than all my favorite board "friends" lost on a combined basis)

    thank God/Bud I only have 2 kids

    the market ALWAYS over reacts

    it was way over reacting to what it thought the drug was

    and then when it found out and began to realize what it really is, it way over reacted the other way

    Ian on twitter had a beautiful example of this: "From week 48 to week 62 (only 24 weeks) - the treatment group declined 24 meters and it was fine - but now its negative - makes sense"

    we have had two big wins here so far

    I still think a 3rd is coming

    but this was an expensive market attitude adjustment, for the moment

  • Reply to


    by jim_himmel Jul 10, 2014 1:39 PM
    simp08801 simp08801 Jul 11, 2014 11:44 AM Flag

    dear jim

    I have read your post

    here are my responses

    1. stop picking on me

    2. why must you attack me?

    3. I feel under attack

    4. do not mess me with me, cuz I am never wrong

    5. I think I am super

    thank you for your support

  • simp08801 simp08801 Jul 11, 2014 8:48 AM Flag

    if we go back to the rumors of a month ago in the dmd community ...

    the boy who broke his ankle has allegedly gained a substantial amount of weight in the last 6 months, which has impacted his mobility

    I believe he was a negative outlier in the aggregate results

  • Reply to

    consider these questions:

    by simp08801 Jul 11, 2014 7:49 AM
    simp08801 simp08801 Jul 11, 2014 8:45 AM Flag

    I agree 100%. but some of the analysts are somehow worrying that the time on drug for each kid will now potentially be a shorter duration. i think that is nuts.

  • Reply to

    Market Got It Wrong Today

    by fundamental.value Jul 10, 2014 10:35 PM
    simp08801 simp08801 Jul 11, 2014 8:00 AM Flag

    I agree

    he is a pillar in that community

    zoooey is quite tight with them as well

  • Reply to

    Ding-a-ling Carl

    by likeafox7210 Jul 10, 2014 12:09 PM
    simp08801 simp08801 Jul 11, 2014 7:54 AM Flag

    check his stock status filings

    he has since had a "family law" event that materially impacted his holdings, and possibly his cash liquidity

    its right in his filings, for quite some time now

    I saw it when his net stock status took a fairly hefty drop

  • consider these questions:

    first the assumptions:

    1. etep efficacy IN THIS TRIAL ON THESE BOYS AT THESE AGES appears to fall off during year 3 and such trend continues, moving future 6mwt results closer to natural history decline

    2. etep safety profile is and continues to be, in the world of drug development, pristine

    now the questions:

    1. since there is no current way to now know if the same or better efficacy limits would result if boys were put on drug at an earlier age, will the FDA, given the pristine safety profile, now require srpt to do a multi-year trial of younger boys before approving etep on some basis?

    2. what is the history of the FDA approving drugs that have efficacy in a specific trial that is under 5 years in duration? (you could ask the same question using 1 year and get a similar answer ...)

    3. assuming the common assumption becomes that etep has a "not forever" efficacy horizon of some sort, but is approved by the FDA, how does the "not forever" thing impact revenue projections for etep?

    IMO, the market will be tripping all over #3, and currently, I still do not understand WHY

    yesterday's analyst statements evidence quite a bit of tripping to me

  • 19,000,000 shares traded

    whether the market got the message right or wrong, the reaction to the message was violent

    and even if this stock has (had) a larger than norm retail base, that kind of volume is wayyy past retail

    I suspect confusion with abound here, at least for now

    the list of questions investors will now obsess over materially grew yesterday

    and those questions are not bullish

    the volume and money flow proves that out

    perhaps only a full on, across the board, corporate update will be required to put a realistic face on the totality of the data

    take the total distance loss over three years ... what would have happened yesterday if the loss was pro rata over three years as opposed to an apparent spike down in year 3?

    what if the average distance loss in year 2 was actually more than it was in year 3? (IT WAS)

    the union needs to be peeled

  • 06/30/2014 10,599,929 shares
    06/13/2014 11,305,930 shares

    shorts were covering while price was dropping

    um, that means longs were selling

    but none of this means anything after the last 7 trading days

    its a brave new world now

    no telling what the short interest is now

    19,000,000 shares traded today

    short interest could be 5 million, or 20 million shares

    the as of july 15 report will tell the tale

  • Reply to

    For Christ' sake Chris, Fix Your Leak

    by greyzone513 Jul 10, 2014 1:36 PM
    simp08801 simp08801 Jul 10, 2014 11:31 PM Flag

    I can give you several examples of this

    but they would annoy you, because most of them involve CG ...

  • Reply to


    by jim_himmel Jul 10, 2014 1:39 PM
    simp08801 simp08801 Jul 10, 2014 11:28 PM Flag

    hey doooooshh

    I want you to read your post that I am responding to

    and then read this quote from your prior post:

    "Gotta admit that Simp wasn't far off the mark is his comments about the data being more complicated for various reasons, that the stellar headlines from the 120 might overshadow today's, and there was a chance that many might sell when they didn't get "cure" type headlines. Now if he/she could just do something about that personality. eeshh."

    how about that last sentence?

    it appears to me that you were actually describing yourself in this post

    you were not man enough about anything

    when you could no longer tell me how wrong I was about what I said, you still could not help yourself and decided to now complain about my personality

    all of this, before I said a single word to you response


    (hint: its ok because you are a clueless doooooosh)

    I should have said more than I did

    I was kind, and your welcome

  • simp08801 simp08801 Jul 10, 2014 5:29 PM Flag

    I heard he reads your posts, all day, and mumbles the following:

    "wow, that TURD, devilsfan, sure has an AWFUL lotta time on his hands, to be posting TERRIBLE things about Srpt, all day, every day"

    you can quote me

  • 1. how does 144 week data impact AA analysis by FDA (timing and substance), up or down, if at all?

    2. how does 144 week data impact current (pre 144 week data) Srpt ex 51 revenue projections off FDA approval, being used by analysts, up or down, if at all?

    IMO, the disparate analyst reactions today evidence new confusion over these issues

    Roth is a perfect example

    BUY intact but price target markedly dropped from 50s to 30s

    so that analyst apparently still believes FDA approval still likely, but the data has done something to his underlying assumptions to result in a material price target reduction?

    IMO, expect further lunacy for a while

    As of now, the Citi analyst has won today's confusion (I am being kind) award

  • Reply to


    by jim_himmel Jul 10, 2014 1:39 PM
    simp08801 simp08801 Jul 10, 2014 2:44 PM Flag


    thank you very much for that heartfelt admission that you and several others just like you were galactic moronic imbeciles, times infinity and beyond, for mindlessly attacking the messenger and ignoring the message, consistent with the lemming retail long code of honor that you all wear so well

    as for your inclusion in your post of taking a new swipe at me, this time for my personality, I have but just one thing to say


    my favorite part of your post was "wasn't far off the mark"

    now that was hilarious

    thank you again

  • simp08801 simp08801 Jul 10, 2014 11:14 AM Flag

    its not that they can't read

    its worse than that


    they refuse to read anything negative when they are in super kool aid mode

    and they refuse to read anything positive when they are in emotional wreck mode

    this is a 100% guaranteed effective prescription for wealth transfer, from them, to short sellers

    we have that in black aces of spades today

  • Reply to

    AF having this data prior to the market

    by davecarmen48 Jul 10, 2014 10:10 AM
    simp08801 simp08801 Jul 10, 2014 11:11 AM Flag

    super, foxy

    there you go, calling names

    last week, you called names when anybody said anything which suggested things were not perfect

    and now today, you call names when anybody says anything which suggests things are not as bad as you think!

    um, I smell retail gone emotional wreck

    foxy, I sincerely hope you get control of your emotions, as emotions kill in the market

    step number 1


    the 120 week data details were your signal, had you taken the time to actually look at what they showed

    I know you can do it

21.34-1.59(-6.93%)Jul 31 3:59 PMEDT

Trending Tickers

Trending Tickers features significant U.S. stocks showing the most dramatic increase in user interest in Yahoo Finance in the previous hour over historic norms. The list is limited to those equities which trade at least 100,000 shares on an average day and have a market cap of more than $300 million.
Tesla Motors, Inc.
NasdaqGSThu, Jul 31, 2014 4:00 PM EDT
GoPro, Inc.
NasdaqGSThu, Jul 31, 2014 4:00 PM EDT