Flounder, once again I have led you to the facts and you refuse to learn, stick by your feelings and forget logic if it makes you feel better. What is Federal law regarding discrimination? In that lies your answer.
You don't think the citizens united case was good law, what make a corporation "speaking" out on this issue any different from a corporation "speaking" out elections? Both have political implications....... Or for that matter lobbying any government agency or elected official? IS it only because on this issue you agree with the corporation, so it is ok for a corporation to have a say?
Flounder, you have argued in the past that case law is more important the Constitutional law....... yet you don't even understand the implications of case law as the basis for future law/ findings.
man you are slow......... law has changed to include orientation into the the root group of those that cannot be discriminated against.......... you really do need to be spoon fed to understand the "facts" verses how you "feel" thing should be....
why your arguement is bugus :Coit v. Green, 404 U.S. 997
since race, creed and orientation etc are lumped together in civil rights law.
Come on Flounder, when you can not defend a position you deflect to other issues and claim one is running from you.... If you would look up the hints I give you, the evidence is there to see from another perspective. You are just afraid to challenge your steadfast "feelings" on issues. If you were to do the thinking for yourself, you will get more out of the information gleamed than if someone spoon feeds their interpretation of the material.
Since no one here know what was said behind the closed door testimony -- it is presumptive to call the jury names or question their integrity.
Flounder, learn to comprehend what you read....... I will not spoon feed you like your masters at DailyKos. You read but do not comprehend, you hear but do not listen, you are but you do not think.
no, the classical liberal response.... look it up and learn something for yourself Reason and enlightment....... two thing you are missing from any post you steal from others and even worse are the post you think up all by yourself.
Flounder, you are just too closed minded to see that a religion is just a group of people that voluntary share a common set of values (barring ISIS and alike controled areas). Have you ever heard of the Culture of IBM, The Culture of GM etc -- they are in effect the religion of the business? You need to think about religion on a philosophical level not a concrete level. You fail in being able to think on your own, on a deeper level than what you are spoon fed by your progressive overlords at Media Matters.
I really don't care about the law.... I don't live in Indiana. Is it bad law? Just as bad as the Fed. law Clinton signed -- likely.
" How does a business develop a religion or a religious conscience?" -- conscience is an ethos or a compact member make if free will. case in point, all the eco blogs you copy and paste that make money off the "religion" of mother earth without being factually balanced. Should they be forced into putting up ads on their sites that promote causes they frown on? If not, they are discriminating against the freedom of ideas. If I wanted to buy an ad on Mother Jones' that promotes a subjest they have an oppostite view of, do they have the "right" to deny the ad? Do the ethos of the leftist have dominance over the ethos of the other groups they differ from in views.
You are just to blinded to see your points were addressed and questioned, but it would take some effort on your end to defend your stolen post on anything but a subjective level. While I consider your post wrong (I'd say your ideas, but you don't have any of your own-- just stolen words from like minded bloggers) and closed minded...... you consider every one who disagrees with your "spoon feeders" of ideology as evil... ex. "deniers" -- subconscious tie into the those that do not think the slaughter of millions ever happened. I am in fact a Liberial in the truest sense of the word -- you are what you claim to hate, a closed minded fool.
Flounder, you have the stone to really believe what you just posted? You are one closed minded, blinded by your "feeling" sad sack.
search -- "Sierra Nevada snowpack historical data" and look for a site called stormking.they have a chart from the late1800's onwards and read the footnotes........... instead of letting Ari Philips of Think Progress do your thinking for you Flounder... do some research for yourself.
Just to help you out... Flounder would like to thank Ari for his one sided, myopic views........ since then he does not have to think for himself.......
Flounder, did you even think about the contradiction in the statement" Whatever conflicts with that reality can be dismissed out of hand because it comes from the liberal media," and your posts (or better "said" any DailyKos, Slate or Median Matters bloggers ideas you steal) dismissing any "conservative" news source out of hand? Do you get the hypocrisy in these stolen words you used?
Pilo, you are giving too much credit to Bush....... the continuation of Clinton's policies under Bush was the problem........along with Congress turning a blind eye when warned of the problems it was not politically good for them to take action.