Fri, Jul 25, 2014, 12:01 AM EDT - U.S. Markets open in 9 hrs 29 mins

Recent

% | $
Click the to save as a favorite.

The Priceline Group Inc. Message Board

sm081969 163 posts  |  Last Activity: 3 hours ago Member since: Oct 20, 2010
  • Z is at 50-day MA and try to test if it can bounce. However, given it's so far above 200-day MA line and the fact that stock lost momentum, it's likely that it will fall below 50-day line and towards 200-day line which is currently at $94. In early August, if there is any sign that revenue growth rate is lower than in 1Q14 or losses are higher than expected, stock could crash hard because of its extremely high valuation (worth repeating the fact that CEO and other insiders sold their entire holdings and Z's valuation is like 3 times other similar companies with similar revenue growth rates).

    Sentiment: Strong Sell

  • sm081969 sm081969 Jul 21, 2014 7:36 AM Flag

    Summer travel is huge this season, not just in the US but also in Europe - earnings should be great.

  • Reply to

    Rascoff Dumping

    by bimac88 Jul 17, 2014 4:13 PM
    sm081969 sm081969 Jul 20, 2014 8:43 AM Flag

    CEO sells his options the day he gets it and he no longer holds any shares of Z. And this is happening right before the earnings report. What conclusions would make sense to you given these facts?

  • CEO and other insiders played it smart. They artfully created false momentum, pushed stock price up, and then sold most of their shares at inflated prices ("pump-and-dump" is illegal now). When 2Q14 results are announced in early August, a similar headline on declining revenue growth for Z (revenue growth propelled stock to obscene levels even in the absence of any profits) will crash its stock price.

  • sm081969 sm081969 Jul 18, 2014 5:47 PM Flag

    "What Will Future Normalized Earnings Look Like:
    2013--Earnings should come in at around $1 based on analyst expectations. In addition, a significant amount of capital could be returned to shareholders. Next year’s earnings plus the earnings from the 4th quarter will allow BAC to return up to $18 billion to shareholders. Moynihan said after BAC reaches Tier 1 cap ratio of 9% (currently at 8.97%), capital will be returned to shareholders on roughly a 1/3 for buybacks, 1/3 to dividends and 1/3 to grow the business
    2014--Pre-tax earnings will grow significantly from a base of around $13.5 billion in 2013. In 2014, many of the initiatives aimed at reducing costs will be in place.
    2015--In 2015, the majority of the litigation, representation and warranties expenses and other overhang from the financial crisis will be over.

    Historically large money center banks have earned on average between .75-1.5% after tax earnings as a percent of assets. Given the increase capital ratios required going forward, I expect Bank of America to come in at the lower end of that range at around 1% once they have cleaned up the current mess. This would result in pre-tax earnings in excess of $30 billion per year."

  • Reply to

    Adding to my short

    by mdb4403 Jul 18, 2014 2:44 PM
    sm081969 sm081969 Jul 18, 2014 5:40 PM Flag

    Bad news for you. By end of July it would be over $17 and by the end of the year over $20. Next year $25+. In 2016, $35. Shorting doesn't look like very smart. Moynihan has said that BAC could earn as much as $30 bi a year once pass these lawsuits and settlements.

  • sm081969 sm081969 Jul 18, 2014 5:29 PM Flag

    That number is actually Moynihan's. Some time ago, he said that once BAC starts making normalized earnings, it's different strong franchises could earn as much as $30 bi a year. I don't think he was talking about 2014 - probably 2015.

  • 1. FRB should announce before Aug 1 that BAC can increase dividend but no buyback for now.
    2. DOJ and BAC should settle for $15 bi with favorable tax consideration and $9.5 bi settlement with Fredie/Fannie counted towards this new settlement.

    Those two announcements would be enough to put BAC on track to normalized earnings in 2H14. If BAC earns $30 bi next year or year after, stock could appreciate to $35 range. Say 100% gain potential over two years. Current book value is almost $21, a 1.5 BV puts it at $32.

  • Today's small gain with very low volume sets the stage for a big decline on Monday with heavy volume. This has happened twice before - history should repeat itself. I expected big decline today, as a follow up to yesterday's decline but didn't happen. ER in early Aug will show declining growth in revenue which would be a killer. By end of Aug, below $90.

    Sentiment: Strong Sell

  • Reply to

    Rascoff Dumping

    by bimac88 Jul 17, 2014 4:13 PM
    sm081969 sm081969 Jul 17, 2014 4:28 PM Flag

    A clue into 2Q14 report coming up in early August? I suspect revenue growth is slowing down and that could trigger massive sell off. Keep in mind that analysts' target price for next 12 months is only $110, so this stock is clearly overvalued. If insiders are selling as soon as they get their options and the fact that it's overvalued set the stage for Z to come down to more reasonable level compared to other competitors (and that level is $50-60 range) perhaps after the 2Q14 report comes out in early August.

    Sentiment: Strong Sell

  • I will go on a limb and say that tomorrow will see a real dump by LONGS and Z will go down to $112 range. Given it's Friday and so much going on in Ukraine (which could directly pit US against Russia), Z investors might be tempted to take their profits and run.

  • Huge ad campaign will cost a bundle, so they will lose money. If they report huge revenue growth, I will be skeptical. Future reports should show that growth of 50-60% is a manufactured dream - even if in early Aug somehow management is able to convince they are a growth company, reality will bring their sand castle down rather quickly thereafter.

  • Reply to

    Two big holders have a big decision ahead of them

    by sm081969 Jul 17, 2014 11:24 AM
    sm081969 sm081969 Jul 17, 2014 1:14 PM Flag

    B-S

  • Reply to

    Two big holders have a big decision ahead of them

    by sm081969 Jul 17, 2014 11:24 AM
    sm081969 sm081969 Jul 17, 2014 12:36 PM Flag

    If fewer sales are being made, that means fewer people looking to buy, that means no need to browse house availability - on-line - mobile are just the means how to get info, but you need people who want info. So I don't get your point. Z's stock price is based on the premise that revenues will grow 50-60% a year - if the housing market cools off, I don't see how Z can achieve revenue targets if there are fewer people looking for a house. There is a huge disconnect.

  • Reply to

    Two big holders have a big decision ahead of them

    by sm081969 Jul 17, 2014 11:24 AM
    sm081969 sm081969 Jul 17, 2014 11:32 AM Flag

    Another option for these two big holders is to sit tight and let Z fall down slowly. But they are investors and they like to make money, so it's very unlikely that they will back and see their profits evaporate. My expectation is that they will sell some and lock in profits (they already lost 10% of their profit opportunity, if they didn't sell at $145).

  • Two big holders that own like 40% of float have been sitting tight on their position - but if housing market softens as interest rates go up and Z is unable to grow revenue by 50-60% a year (which is the basis of astronomical rise in stock price that is 3 times more than competitors with similar revenue growth rates), then it raises the million-dollar question for them as to what to do. If they sell, stock price could collapse to$80 just like that (because there are no LONG buyers, yes there are SHORT buyers). If they don't sell, lack of demand will push it down any way and their ability to keep Z high would require a lot more capital than before and it would become way too risky. I think they will unload some of their shares regularly and lock in profit. That means, Z will go down slowly but eventually settle down around $50-60 which is supportable by market demand/supply forces.

    Sentiment: Strong Sell

  • Cooling housing market puts a big question mark on Z's growth opportunities. Since Z doesn't make any money, high expectations about revenue growth is unlikely to be realized - it's stock valuation is totally out of sync of reality. As interest rates start to go up, as FED has indicated, housing will only get worse not better.

    Sentiment: Strong Sell

  • On July 3, Z went up with very low volume but then on next trading day, it went down $7 with heavy volume. Yesterday, Z went up slightly with VERY LOW volume - if history repeats itself, we should see a $7 decline today with heavy volume. Analysts are beginning to focus on stock price disparity by a factor of 3 between Z and other real estate websites that are growing revenues at the same rate (or higher) than Z. Given Z spent $35 mi on advertising to build up brand, the earning report in early August will show a loss, again, and CEO will justify losses by using the argument that they spent on advertising to have higher growth in the future. Z is a ponzie scheme and will have to face reality sooner or later, and that's why CEO and other insiders sold most of their shares at inflated prices. The government is also going after bubbles in the market - SEC halted trading in CYNK (it wouldn't be a surprise if SEC is looking into Z trading manipulation and also XEO's frequent TV appearances/company press releases to create momentum related to "pump-and-dump" by insiders). Yellen talked about bubble forming among small-cap Internet stocks.

  • BAC has nice franchises and market presence - it's just that mess Countrywide acquisition created has proven to be hard to get rid of, even 7 years after the financial meltdown. With AIG settlement done, as far as I know the pending DOJ case is the last major one for which BAC offered $13 bi but DOJ wants $17 bi - I assume BAC put aside in today's ER enough to cover a possible $15 bi settlement (mid-point, just like in case of Citigroup) - as I understand it, BAC is seeking credit for $9 bi settlement they already did with FHICA (Fannie/Fredie) and better tax treatment (so after-tax net cost to BAC would be manageable). If this thing is resolved, by Aug 1 FRB is supposed to announce whether they approve/reject new revised capital plan (that includes increase in dividend to 5 cents). Without litigation cost, BAC's EPS were more like 41 cents that beats analyst's 29 cents estimate. Therefore, I think damage to BAC has been overdone and it should start going up again. If Moynihan's comment some time ago that BAC could earn as much as $30 bi a year, would suggest a stock price of $35+ once they have put behind litigation issues. I bought some BAC today, hoping that next year (if not this year) they would at least increase dividend to $0.20 per year which would provide some income while waiting for stock to go up to normal levels in say 2015-16.

    Sentiment: Buy

  • Reply to

    Volume plumetted - why?

    by sm081969 Jul 16, 2014 4:34 PM
    sm081969 sm081969 Jul 16, 2014 4:40 PM Flag

    Last time it happened was on July 3 when stock went up fractionally with very little volume but then next trading day it went down almost 7 points with heavy volume. Could history repeat itself tomorrow?

PCLN
1,236.73-1.95(-0.16%)Jul 24 4:00 PMEDT

Trending Tickers

i
Trending Tickers features significant U.S. stocks showing the most dramatic increase in user interest in Yahoo Finance in the previous hour over historic norms. The list is limited to those equities which trade at least 100,000 shares on an average day and have a market cap of more than $300 million.